Avengers >> View Post
·
Post By
The Black Guardian
Moderator

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 24,039
In Reply To
Reverend Meteor

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 10,318
Subj: Re: Kang the Conqueror
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2018 at 04:36:30 pm EST (Viewed 107 times)
Reply Subj: Re: Kang the Conqueror
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2018 at 02:44:35 pm EST (Viewed 105 times)



    Quote:
    Can't agree. Kang's just a bad character. That's why they always have to tell us he's also Rama Tut, Immortus, Dr. Doom, Scarlet Centurion etc.

Yup. And Iron Lad. Because if anyone needed another alias it was him. *rolls eyes*


    Quote:
    He isn't relevant no matter how many plot twists and time doppelgangers and Ravonnas or Marcuses they want to throw at us. He's a badly designed character through and through.



    Quote:
    If I had to sum Kang up in one word it would be...cruft.

That is the perfect word for him, although I really don't mind the Rama Tut part of his story.


    Quote:
    I won't see the Avengers movie that has Kang in it.

Nor I.


Posted with Mozilla Firefox 58.0 on Windows 10
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2018 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2018 by Alvaro Ortiz and Dave Galanter. Software Copyright © 2003-2018 Powermad Software