Batman >> View Post
·
Post By
Knight

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 8,463
In Reply To
emerickman 
Moderator

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 54,305
Subj: Re: Batman #33...
Posted: Sun Oct 29, 2017 at 04:13:18 pm EDT (Viewed 42 times)
Reply Subj: Batman #33...
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2017 at 08:38:37 am EDT (Viewed 92 times)

Previous Post

Batman 033 (2017)

Strange that this is the first (who knows how long after) post-proposal acceptance scenario that DC thinks that Batfans would want to see.

Curious in this age of JLA transporters that Batman would essentially endorse a mission that inevitably get a horse dehydrated and shot.

Exchanging "I love you"'s is such a positive thing with engaged couples... but with Bat and Cat it seemed... what's the adjective?... hmm...

The Alfred scene was good entertainment (a bit drawn out) but was it his place to spill the beans? It's source to the new banner submission.

Catwoman vs Guard in the Desert was a disappointing one-bit gag when it would have been better to actually see how she beat the JLA appointed "pushover".

The country of Khadym and Talia was new (OMG-that's) extreme measures reveal to me - can anyone share the current backstory with her?

Other than the above contrivances? nits?, it's not thaaat bad and issue. What do YOU think?


Source of preview pages:




Support Cancer Research and Alzheimer Research.


I cannot fathom how or why King loves the brown trench coat and goggles look for Batman (ripped from the BvS movie) when, to be blunt, it looks freakin' ridiculous.

But I see Snyder's way of thinking is contagious because King is showing it here. Not only that, but Batman wielding a shotgun? He HATES guns. Way out of character. I was really hoping King was joking around in the interview I read some time ago where he said Batman would be wearing a trench coat and holding a shot gun. I see now that he was not.

I'm staying away from this guy's run. He obviously has no clue or understanding on how Batman works as a character.





It's interesting that a hero/villain performs one amazing feat, or use a power they haven't used for 20+ years, and that automatically propels them to a high status despite scans and evidence to the contrary. I don't know what is worse, selective feat picking that has only been done once or twice 20, or more, years ago or ignoring evidence from scans or the lack thereof. We need to stop putting our favorite heroes/villains on pedestals and start putting them where they really belong. But it's evident that people never will because they would rather accuse others of cherry picking feats, when they don't, and being 'morally superior' when they aren't. I guess being honest and as fair as possible only opens one up to being the target of childish accusations and fault finding by those who insist on acting petty and childish. What happened to a good debate between two civil, mature, adults?
Posted with Mozilla 11.0 on Windows 7
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2017 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2017 by Alvaro Ortiz and Dave Galanter. Software Copyright © 2003-2017 Powermad Software