Comic Battle >> View Post
Post By

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 9,715
In Reply To

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 59,265
Subj: Re: Galactus vs Mr. Oz?
Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 at 01:18:33 pm EDT (Viewed 214 times)
Reply Subj: Galactus vs Mr. Oz?
Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 at 05:30:30 am EDT (Viewed 278 times)

Previous Post

Usually the match ups are pretty often obvious and repeated -like a cleavagefightcatfight with Felicia and Selina- but this NICE art piece has some interesting new one to my knowledge:

Lobo vs Thing?
Hawkman vs Torch?
Batwoman vs Moon Knight?
Kitty vs Harley?
Colossus vs Barda?
Firestorm vs Vision?

...Galactus vs Mr.OZ ??!! Really?! Props for Oz to get included. (That is Oz, right?)

I miss Dad & Dan.

Lobo beats the Thing

Human Torch beats Hawkman

Moon Knight beats Batwoman

Kitty beats Harley

Barda beats Colossus

Vision beats Firestorm

Galactus beats Spectre IF he's fully fed. Weaker versions lose to the Spectre.

Wolverine beats Nightwing

The Atom beats Ant-Man

The Flash beat Quicksilver

Batman beats Captain America but can easily go the other way too.

Dr. Fate barely beats Dr. Strange

Superman beats Savage Hulk

Aquaman beats Namor

Green Arrow barely beats Hawkeye (Sorry, I'll usually pick the original over the rip off).

Gladiator beat Martian Manhunter

Thor beats Captain Marvel

Iron Man beats Cyborg

Catwoman beats Black Cat

Wonder Woman beats She-Hulk

Green Lantern (Hal) beats Spider-Man

Zatanna beats Scarlet Witch

Hawkgirl beats Spider-Woman

Don't know who Robin is facing but it looks like he's losing.

It's interesting that a hero/villain performs one amazing feat, or use a power they haven't used for 20+ years, and that automatically propels them to a high status despite scans and evidence to the contrary. I don't know what is worse, selective feat picking that has only been done once or twice 20, or more, years ago or ignoring evidence from scans or the lack thereof. We need to stop putting our favorite heroes/villains on pedestals and start putting them where they really belong. But it's evident that people never will because they would rather accuse others of cherry picking feats, when they don't, and being 'morally superior' when they aren't. I guess being honest and as fair as possible only opens one up to being the target of childish accusations and fault finding by those who insist on acting petty and childish. What happened to a good debate between two civil, mature, adults?
Posted with Mozilla 11.0 on Windows 7
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2018 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2018 by Alvaro Ortiz and Dave Galanter. Software Copyright © 2003-2018 Powermad Software