The Superman Family Message Board >> View Post
·
Post By
Knight

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 9,519
In Reply To
omike015 
Mod of Steel

Location: The Bottle City of Kandor
Member Since: Sun Oct 10, 1999
Posts: 4,356
Subj: Good points. *NT*
Posted: Wed Jan 17, 2018 at 10:02:04 pm EST (Viewed 39 times)
Reply Subj: New blood
Posted: Wed Jan 17, 2018 at 03:46:08 am EST (Viewed 79 times)

Previous Post


    Quote:
    In light of the Bendis discussion below, whom would you choose to write Superman? To be frank, I can't think of anyone current. I wouldn't mind seeing Elliot S! Maggin have a go at a story, or Alex Ross, but those lads have made their mark on the character, and I think a fresh hand is called for to some extent. Still, I cannot think of anyone from the present crop of writers that I would put to write Superman.

As much as I'd love a new Superman story from Maggin or Cary Bates or Ordway or Louise Simonson or Roger Stern or Jeph Loeb or ... (ad nauseum), I think what the character needs is someone else. Someone who hasn't written the character before (or at least not as a regular writer). As much as I love all those folks and what they did for the character, you have to move on at some point. (And that doesn't mean toss out what the character stands for or defy the nature of the character.) It doesn't even have to be a "name." Maggin didn't have a long résume´ when he started writing Superman, either.


nt





It's interesting that a hero/villain performs one amazing feat, or use a power they haven't used for 20+ years, and that automatically propels them to a high status despite scans and evidence to the contrary. I don't know what is worse, selective feat picking that has only been done once or twice 20, or more, years ago or ignoring evidence from scans or the lack thereof. We need to stop putting our favorite heroes/villains on pedestals and start putting them where they really belong. But it's evident that people never will because they would rather accuse others of cherry picking feats, when they don't, and being 'morally superior' when they aren't. I guess being honest and as fair as possible only opens one up to being the target of childish accusations and fault finding by those who insist on acting petty and childish. What happened to a good debate between two civil, mature, adults?
Posted with Mozilla 11.0 on Windows 7
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2018 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2018 by Alvaro Ortiz and Dave Galanter. Software Copyright © 2003-2018 Powermad Software