|The Superman Family Message Board >> View Post|
Subj: This is a good question
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2018 at 06:30:38 pm EST (Viewed 106 times)
Reply Subj: Why Is Superman Such A Tough Character To Write And Portray On Film?
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2018 at 04:25:59 pm EST (Viewed 128 times)
And some of the reasons I've read are:
1. Superman is hard to relate to. Basically, he's the guy who always does the right thing and never makes mistakes. He's perfect and has no flaws.
2. Because of #1, Superman is a cardboard cutout. So, in an attempt to make Superman more realistic, he's written to be darker with some character flaws.
3. Superman is boring.
I can tell you right here and right now that every single one of these reasons are DEAD WRONG.
1. Any hard core or regular reader of Superman can tell you that Superman has many things about him that almost anyone can relate to. He's an alien and because of that, he's an outsider and feels alone and isolated. I may not be an alien but I've felt alone and isolated many times so I can relate to this.
Superman is a Dad. Anyone who has a son can relate to this.
Superman is a afraid of failure, which has been touched upon in some stories. Many people can relate to this.
Superman once suffered post traumatic stress disorder because of the Our Worlds at War storyline. Afterwards, he needed to see a therapist. War veterans can relate this.
Superman, as a teen, once let a friend drive drunk. That friend ended up dying and Clark regretted that for the rest of his life. Some people can relate to this.
Superman grew up on a farm and grew to have discipline through hard work and labor. Some of us can relate to that.
Superman is married and has marital problems. A lot of us can relate to that.
The list goes on and a lot more can be added if these movie writers would bother to look. But these people have never read a single Superman issue, which is why they view him as a cardboard cutout. None of them understand how Superman works as a character and that is why he is difficult to write.
It's interesting that a hero/villain performs one amazing feat, or use a power they haven't used for 20+ years, and that automatically propels them to a high status despite scans and evidence to the contrary. I don't know what is worse, selective feat picking that has only been done once or twice 20, or more, years ago or ignoring evidence from scans or the lack thereof. We need to stop putting our favorite heroes/villains on pedestals and start putting them where they really belong. But it's evident that people never will because they would rather accuse others of cherry picking feats, when they don't, and being 'morally superior' when they aren't. I guess being honest and as fair as possible only opens one up to being the target of childish accusations and fault finding by those who insist on acting petty and childish. What happened to a good debate between two civil, mature, adults?
Posted with Mozilla 11.0 on Windows 7
|Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2018 Powermad Software|