Wonder Woman Message Board >> View Post
·
Post By
Knight

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 9,752
In Reply To
[PREVIEW] 
Moderator

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 60,466
Subj: Re: Wonder Woman (2016-) #35
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2017 at 12:19:14 pm EST (Viewed 390 times)
Reply Subj: Wonder Woman (2016-) #35
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 at 05:15:03 pm EST (Viewed 383 times)

Previous Post

Wonder Woman (2016-) #35


> “TIMES PAST” part two! Raised on the Grecian isles, Wonder Woman’s long-hidden brother, Jason, tried to lead a simple life, running away from his birthright. But when Darkseid’s daughter, Grail, learns of his existence, will he be ready for the chaos she brings with her?

Source of Preview Pages:
https://www.readdcentertainment.com/Wonder-Woman-2016-35/digital-comic/T1635200355001





Post your comments on this issue here!


I don't know about anybody else, but I really don't appreciate how this writer keeps telling us about Diana's search for, and finally found, her brother only to give us, not one but TWO stories that take the focus away from Diana and placed on Grail and then Jason.

Basically, the story goes like this.

Trying to find Jason.
Finds Jason
Grail Narrative
Diana's meeting with Jason doesn't go well
Origin of Jason

Am I the only one irritated with this? I'm starting to think this book is more about Diana's cast of characters rather than what the TITLE of the book clearly says: WONDER WOMAN





It's interesting that a hero/villain performs one amazing feat, or use a power they haven't used for 20+ years, and that automatically propels them to a high status despite scans and evidence to the contrary. I don't know what is worse, selective feat picking that has only been done once or twice 20, or more, years ago or ignoring evidence from scans or the lack thereof. We need to stop putting our favorite heroes/villains on pedestals and start putting them where they really belong. But it's evident that people never will because they would rather accuse others of cherry picking feats, when they don't, and being 'morally superior' when they aren't. I guess being honest and as fair as possible only opens one up to being the target of childish accusations and fault finding by those who insist on acting petty and childish. What happened to a good debate between two civil, mature, adults?
Posted with Mozilla 11.0 on Windows 7
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2018 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2018 by Alvaro Ortiz and Dave Galanter. Software Copyright © 2003-2018 Powermad Software