Wonder Woman Message Board >> View Post
·
Post By
Knight

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 9,727
In Reply To
[PREVIEW] 
Moderator

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 59,608
Subj: Re: Injustice 2 (2017-) #29
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2017 at 11:49:01 am EST (Viewed 242 times)
Reply Subj: Injustice 2 (2017-) #29
Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2017 at 08:02:50 pm EST (Viewed 269 times)

Previous Post

Injustice 2 (2017-) #29
> Black Adam and Damian send Supergirl out on a mission to rescue Wonder Woman from a Themiscyran prison. But before her would-be liberator arrives, the former Princess Diana is visited in her cell by an old antagonist.


pg1-3:
https://www.readdcentertainment.com/Injustice-2-2017-29/digital-comic/T1727200295001





Comments?


Damian was actually likable in this issue. Imagine that...

Now, if only Damian was written this way in the regular books, I might just stop hating him with a passion.

I feel sorry for Kara's "innocence" in this issue, as well as her ignorance. If she only knew some of the things Wonder Woman has done in the Injustice Universe, Kara would leave her to rot in prison.

Oh, and your a little behind. Injustice 2 has already come out with a few more issues than just issue #29. In a future issue *SPOILERS*

*SPOILERS*

*SPOILERS*

*SPOILERS*

*SPOILERS*

*SPOILERS*

*SPOILERS*

Kara breaks MAGIC chains that were forged to hold gods, that Diana herself couldn't break. Too bad that awesome (and very P.I.S.) feat wasn't in the regular books.





It's interesting that a hero/villain performs one amazing feat, or use a power they haven't used for 20+ years, and that automatically propels them to a high status despite scans and evidence to the contrary. I don't know what is worse, selective feat picking that has only been done once or twice 20, or more, years ago or ignoring evidence from scans or the lack thereof. We need to stop putting our favorite heroes/villains on pedestals and start putting them where they really belong. But it's evident that people never will because they would rather accuse others of cherry picking feats, when they don't, and being 'morally superior' when they aren't. I guess being honest and as fair as possible only opens one up to being the target of childish accusations and fault finding by those who insist on acting petty and childish. What happened to a good debate between two civil, mature, adults?
Posted with Mozilla 11.0 on Windows 7
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2018 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2018 by Alvaro Ortiz and Dave Galanter. Software Copyright © 2003-2018 Powermad Software