X-Universe >> View Post
·
Post By
The Black Guardian 
Moderator

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 22,784
In Reply To
Reverend Meteor

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 8,818
Subj: Re: Disney/Fox deal...what does it mean for Wanda and Pietro?
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2017 at 08:02:59 am EST (Viewed 83 times)
Reply Subj: Re: Disney/Fox deal...what does it mean for Wanda and Pietro?
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2017 at 12:45:08 am EST (Viewed 85 times)

Previous Post



    Quote:
    For a while, it doesn't mean anything. The deal still needs government approval.



    Quote:
    I doubt things like Wanda/Pietro will change quickly. But who knows... we also have a new EIC.



    Quote:
    My opinion is that Wanda/Pietro are in better positions than they've ever been. I never liked them being Our Lord Magneto's kids.


I kinda wish we could find out the twins have different fathers (it can happen in fraternal twins)

Pietro doesn't work unless he's Magneto's son IMO. Wanda doesn't really work as his daughter though. Wanda really does work better as a gypsy sorceress.

Pietro not being a mutant is unforgivable. Wanda being a mutant doesn't really matter IMO. She's got so many weird power sources as it is anyways (life force, chaos magic, nexus being, chthon, the sorcery Agatha taught her, whatever she inherited from Natalya, High Evolutionary genetic modifications etc).




I still prefer they both be mutants because I've always hated Wanda having real magic. Her name is supposed to be ironic because of evil flatscans, dammit.

But there's no need for any relationship with Magneto. My preference is that things in Marvel not be interconnected.


Posted with Mozilla Firefox 57.0 on Windows 10
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2018 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2018 by Alvaro Ortiz and Dave Galanter. Software Copyright © 2003-2018 Powermad Software