|
|
|
|
| Posts • Reviews • Rules • FAQ • DC Guide • Marvel Guide • Second-String Sanctuary • ComicList • SnarkBait • DONATE |
 |
|||
| |||
|
X-Universe
Moderated by patoliver & Mr. Sinister |
Everybody read this, please. - Mr Sinister - Sun Mar 15, 2009 at 08:15:10 am EDT Re: Everybody read this, please. - Enjis - Mon Mar 16, 2009 at 05:29:33 pm EDT Partial moratorium on Surveys and Polls... - neil - Fri Sep 12, 2008 at 01:40:25 pm EDT LOL, 1st issue of Cable that didnt frustrate me [Spoilers] - stupid baby - Today at 07:37:01 pm EST Deadpool: Does anybody know what's up with the "Head Trip" collection? - Pym Particle - Yesterday at 02:20:51 pm EST Deadpool issure question - stupid baby - Yesterday at 09:14:42 am EST Re: Deadpool issure question [Spoilers] - The Black Guardian - Yesterday at 03:29:17 pm EST Question about AoA - Lightning Strike - Mon Mar 08, 2010 at 03:54:17 pm EST not essential in the least. its publication date should let you know that. the issue is decent, not great. (no text) - Hans Goodman - Mon Mar 08, 2010 at 06:27:19 pm EST mystery secret avenger... [Spoilers] - Hans Goodman - Mon Mar 08, 2010 at 03:35:38 pm EST Re: mystery secret avenger... [Spoilers] - The Black Guardian - Mon Mar 08, 2010 at 11:29:19 pm EST this could just be a product of deodato's style. we'll see. (no text) [Spoilers] - Hans Goodman - Yesterday at 01:44:44 am EST Deodato would have to be Marvel's worst artist for that to be, imo. (no text) [Spoilers] - The Black Guardian - Yesterday at 02:07:17 am EST come on now. that's going too far by any standards. he has some interesting tics. (no text) [Spoilers] - Hans Goodman - Yesterday at 10:50:12 am EST I don't actually think Deodato is that bad, which is why I don't see it being Gorilla Man or Beast. Looks more like Spidey to me (but I know it's not). (no text) [Spoilers] - The Black Guardian - Yesterday at 03:00:55 pm EST i don't think deodato is bad, but i could see him having issues with a non-human physique. (no text) [Spoilers] - Hans Goodman - Yesterday at 03:43:04 pm EST Psylocke # 3 and #4: All hail Wolverine? [Spoilers] - emerick-man - Sun Mar 07, 2010 at 10:51:58 pm EST The "slicing bits off" goes back to the Death of Mariko story itself (or, more precisely, the epilogue issue) & has been referenced a few times since. (no text) - Somebody - Mon Mar 08, 2010 at 01:42:23 pm EST Re: Huh, didn't realize that. Good and bad aspects to it at the same time. Thanks. (no text) - emerick-man - Mon Mar 08, 2010 at 06:46:29 pm EST Re: So What Happened To Matsuo? [Spoilers] - Comicguy1 - Mon Mar 08, 2010 at 12:53:10 am EST Re: So What Happened To Matsuo? [Spoilers] - The Black Guardian - Mon Mar 08, 2010 at 12:23:35 pm EST Re: Psylocke # 3 and #4: All hail Wolverine? [Spoilers] - The Black Guardian - Mon Mar 08, 2010 at 12:16:19 am EST It's not just spam - it's the Comicboards Fantasy Baseball league! - neil - Sun Mar 07, 2010 at 09:14:03 am EST Wolverine: Weapon X #11=Awesome! [Spoilers] - Thorcules - Sun Mar 07, 2010 at 12:04:58 am EST Re: Wolverine: Weapon X #11=Awesome! [Spoilers] - Q - Sun Mar 07, 2010 at 05:56:00 pm EST Re: Wolverine: Weapon X #11=Awesome! [Spoilers] - Thorcules - Sun Mar 07, 2010 at 06:54:16 pm EST Re: Wolverine: Weapon X #11=Awesome! [Spoilers] - mjyoung - Sun Mar 07, 2010 at 08:23:34 pm EST Re: Wolverine: Weapon X #11=Awesome! [Spoilers] - Q - Mon Mar 08, 2010 at 01:39:51 pm EST The original "original" X-Force - Sandman - Fri Mar 05, 2010 at 10:50:56 pm EST Would Anybody Else Like To See Mark Waid Back On the X-Books? - Comicguy1 - Thu Mar 04, 2010 at 02:32:17 pm EST Would Anybody Else Like To See Mark Waid Back On the X-Books? - Comicguy1 - Thu Mar 04, 2010 at 02:32:16 pm EST I think Waid would be a great choice, as would Kelly and Seagle, it all beats Fraction! (no text) - The Big Ragu - Fri Mar 05, 2010 at 03:12:25 pm EST Joe Kelly and Steve Seagle FTW (no text) - Architect - Thu Mar 04, 2010 at 11:36:44 pm EST Re: Joe Kelly and Steve Seagle FTW - The Black Guardian - Fri Mar 05, 2010 at 05:07:12 pm EST Re: Joe Kelly and Steve Seagle FTW - Architect - Sat Mar 06, 2010 at 03:02:42 pm EST Re: Joe Kelly and Steve Seagle FTW - The Black Guardian - Sat Mar 06, 2010 at 03:49:25 pm EST Re: Joe Kelly and Steve Seagle FTW - Menshevik - Sun Mar 07, 2010 at 04:41:36 am EST Re: Joe Kelly and Steve Seagle FTW - Hand Goodman - Sat Mar 06, 2010 at 05:39:44 pm EST Re: Joe Kelly and Steve Seagle FTW - The Black Guardian - Sat Mar 06, 2010 at 11:49:40 pm EST steve seagle was fine. but whatever it took to get joe kelly back is OK by me. (no text) - Hans Goodman - Fri Mar 05, 2010 at 01:24:42 pm EST Not I. (no text) - Reboot - Thu Mar 04, 2010 at 06:27:10 pm EST Re: Would Anybody Else Like To See Mark Waid Back On the X-Books? - The Black Guardian - Thu Mar 04, 2010 at 04:43:34 pm EST Re: Would Anybody Else Like To See Mark Waid Back On the X-Books? - pakesh - Fri Mar 05, 2010 at 06:33:23 pm EST King Claremont! Ha! thats great! - stupid baby - Fri Mar 05, 2010 at 11:15:09 pm EST Re: King Claremont! Ha! thats great! - pakesh - Sat Mar 06, 2010 at 09:10:04 pm EST Re: Would Anybody Else Like To See Mark Waid Back On the X-Books? - Mr Sinister 
- Fri Mar 05, 2010 at 07:33:34 pm EST Re: Would Anybody Else Like To See Mark Waid Back On the X-Books? - pakesh - Sat Mar 06, 2010 at 09:09:26 pm EST Iceman #1... [Spoilers] - emerick-man - Wed Mar 03, 2010 at 02:00:00 pm EST Re: Iceman #1... [Spoilers] - The Black Guardian - Wed Mar 03, 2010 at 03:15:39 pm EST Question about Hope... [Spoilers] - AuntMayMustDie - Tue Mar 02, 2010 at 11:51:53 pm EST She's Rachel NT (no text) [Spoilers] - pakesh - Fri Mar 05, 2010 at 06:34:53 pm EST The Phoenix Force: Mutantkind's New Hope [Spoilers] - stingerman - Fri Mar 05, 2010 at 02:32:04 pm EST Re: Question about Hope... [Spoilers] - SkullAngel - Thu Mar 04, 2010 at 12:56:49 pm EST Re: Question about Hope... [Spoilers] - The Black Guardian - Wed Mar 03, 2010 at 02:35:14 pm EST Re: Question about Hope... [Spoilers] - E5150 - Wed Mar 03, 2010 at 08:58:34 am EST Re: Question about Hope... [Spoilers] - The Black Guardian - Wed Mar 03, 2010 at 02:37:02 pm EST Re: Question about Hope... [Spoilers] - Ice E. - Wed Mar 03, 2010 at 08:57:27 am EST X-men: HOPE one shot... [Spoilers] - AuntMayMustDie - Wed Mar 03, 2010 at 07:19:33 pm EST Re: X-men: HOPE one shot... [Spoilers] - AuntMayMustDie - Wed Mar 03, 2010 at 07:43:08 pm EST Re: X-men: HOPE one shot... [Spoilers] - The Black Guardian - Fri Mar 05, 2010 at 01:45:42 am EST Re: X-men: HOPE one shot... [Spoilers] - Unstable Molecule - Thu Mar 04, 2010 at 05:35:15 pm EST 
We Are the X-Men - ICE - Mon Mar 01, 2010 at 07:57:55 pm EST Re: We Are the X-Men - The Black Guardian - Mon Mar 01, 2010 at 11:22:34 pm EST Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? - Mr Sinister - Tue Mar 02, 2010 at 05:51:57 pm EST That was my first thought as well. (no text) - ICE - Tue Mar 02, 2010 at 02:39:31 pm EST "Who Watches the X-Men?" (no text) - Hans Goodman - Tue Mar 02, 2010 at 01:17:49 am EST Beast dead - Blue Hulk - Mon Mar 01, 2010 at 12:07:30 am EST look, if grant morrison, who never read a beast comic or even included beast in his original pitch, wants beast to be a lion man, he's a lion man. (no text) - Hans Goodman - Mon Mar 01, 2010 at 12:50:06 pm EST Certainly Morrison should have aspired to the logic of the original transformation story... - Nitz the Bloody - Mon Mar 01, 2010 at 05:48:36 pm EST Re: Certainly Morrison should have aspired to the logic of the original transformation story... - Menshevik - Tue Mar 02, 2010 at 03:10:10 am EST Re: Certainly Morrison should have aspired to the logic of the original transformation story... - Nitz the Bloody - Tue Mar 02, 2010 at 09:01:45 pm EST Re: Certainly Morrison should have aspired to the logic of the original transformation story... - Menshevik - Wed Mar 03, 2010 at 03:37:53 am EST "convenient." yes. that word describes morrison's x-men to perfection. lazy. convenient. yes. (no text) - Hans Goodman - Tue Mar 02, 2010 at 09:43:34 pm EST Re: Certainly Morrison should have aspired to the logic of the original transformation story... - Michael - Tue Mar 02, 2010 at 08:42:51 am EST Re: Certainly Morrison should have aspired to the logic of the original transformation story... - Menshevik - Tue Mar 02, 2010 at 12:09:41 pm EST Re: Certainly Morrison should have aspired to the logic of the original transformation story... - iTG - Tue Mar 02, 2010 at 07:17:43 am EST Re: Certainly Morrison should have aspired to the logic of the original transformation story... - Hans Goodman - Tue Mar 02, 2010 at 10:57:35 am EST *stands up and claps* - Evil G:DR - Sun Mar 07, 2010 at 07:35:07 pm EST Hans Goodman is making friends by the day! (no text) - Hans Goodman - Mon Mar 08, 2010 at 10:57:07 pm EST Hmm... when you put it that way... Brilliant! (no text) - The Black Guardian - Tue Mar 02, 2010 at 03:23:05 pm EST Here here! (no text) - ICE - Tue Mar 02, 2010 at 02:41:01 pm EST thanks, guys! i'm particularly proud of that little blurb. (no text) - Hans Goodman - Tue Mar 02, 2010 at 09:51:05 pm EST this story was no more or less ridiculous (and far less lazy by any standard) than secondary mutations. (no text) - Hans Goodman - Mon Mar 01, 2010 at 10:39:04 pm EST The corollary to "X was bad" isn't "so Y can be bad too", but "so Y should be better". (no text) - Reboot - Mon Mar 01, 2010 at 07:19:02 pm EST More like " X was much worse, so why are you complaining more about Y "... (no text) - Nitz the Bloody - Tue Mar 02, 2010 at 09:02:45 pm EST "Why are you complaining about Fraction's UXM? Austen was so bad, MF can do no wrong. Oh, and Greg Land is tons better than Ashley Wood, so you have no right to comp ... - Reboot - Wed Mar 03, 2010 at 07:40:08 am EST in order: 1) chuck austen's awfulness has nothing to do with any other writer. 2) i'd rather look at ashley wood's art through cataract eyes than land's with 20/20 v ... (no text) - Hans Goodman - Wed Mar 03, 2010 at 10:47:30 am EST Note quotation marks and the interior of the post. I wasn't SERIOUSLY saying those things. (no text) - Reboot - Wed Mar 03, 2010 at 01:46:09 pm EST sowwy. i thought it was a "NT" post. (no text) - Hans Goodman - Wed Mar 03, 2010 at 02:59:21 pm EST The real problem is not the aesthetic change... - Mr Sinister - Mon Mar 01, 2010 at 06:15:28 pm EST well, there are two problems... - Hans Goodman - Mon Mar 01, 2010 at 10:37:37 pm EST Except when he's a persian-cat-man. Or a dog-man. Or a bear-man. Or a donkey-man. Or any of the myriad "Cat Beasts" that have shown up. (no text) - Reboot - Mon Mar 01, 2010 at 01:54:33 pm EST the mark of a great character design is when nobody can get it right, not even the guy who created it. everyone knows this. (no text) - Hans Goodman - Mon Mar 01, 2010 at 02:10:45 pm EST x-force recruits - New x-force line up - Sun Feb 28, 2010 at 01:36:26 pm EST Re: x-force recruits - Raz - Mon Mar 01, 2010 at 07:01:05 am EST Re: x-force recruits - Kylun - Xorneto2 - Sun Feb 28, 2010 at 06:13:23 pm EST Re: x-force recruits - mjyoung - Sun Feb 28, 2010 at 03:27:04 pm EST I have a question for die hard x-men fans - Evil x-men - Sun Feb 28, 2010 at 01:23:25 pm EST Yes.... - Thorcules - Sun Feb 28, 2010 at 05:53:26 pm EST also, your story idea involves cassandra nova... - Hans Goodman - Thu Mar 04, 2010 at 10:48:22 am EST Moonstar Question - destiny2099 - Sun Feb 28, 2010 at 08:44:19 am EST Re: Moonstar Question - Thorcules - Sun Feb 28, 2010 at 05:45:09 pm EST How Is Daniel Way Doing On Deadpool? - Comicguy1 - Sat Feb 27, 2010 at 02:25:18 pm EST Re: How Is Daniel Way Doing On Deadpool? - Architect - Sun Feb 28, 2010 at 11:00:58 am EST It's okay... - Thorcules - Sat Feb 27, 2010 at 02:41:01 pm EST what's with the skepticism? "like you say you are?" i take him at his word. (no text) - Hans Goodman - Sun Feb 28, 2010 at 02:40:09 am EST Re: what's with the skepticism? "like you say you are?" i take him at his word. - Thorcules - Sun Feb 28, 2010 at 03:08:17 am EST X-Force 24... [Spoilers] - emerick-man - Sat Feb 27, 2010 at 02:11:36 pm EST Re: X-Force 24... [Spoilers] - The Black Guardian - Mon Mar 01, 2010 at 04:15:54 pm EST About the art... [Spoilers] - Unstable Molecule - Mon Mar 01, 2010 at 12:45:12 pm EST X-Factor #202 - Layla - Xorneto2 - Sat Feb 27, 2010 at 07:09:15 am EST well, X-Factor is more Xmen than the current Xmen - eugenio abraham: the ex exposed guy - Mon Mar 01, 2010 at 05:23:08 pm EST Re: X-Factor #202 - Layla - Peter David - Sun Feb 28, 2010 at 08:27:01 am EST Re: X-Factor #202 - Layla - Xorneto2 - Sun Feb 28, 2010 at 06:20:13 pm EST Re: X-Factor #202 - Layla - Peter David - Mon Mar 01, 2010 at 08:11:26 am EST Re: X-Factor #202 - Layla [Spoilers] - Thorcules - Sat Feb 27, 2010 at 06:33:41 pm EST Re: X-Factor #202 - Layla [Spoilers] - The Black Guardian - Sat Feb 27, 2010 at 04:52:06 pm EST Re: X-Factor #202 - Layla - Mr Sinister - Sat Feb 27, 2010 at 08:55:33 am EST Re: X-Factor #202 - Layla - Xorneto2 - Sun Feb 28, 2010 at 06:18:53 pm EST Re: X-Factor #202 - Layla - Mr Sinister - Mon Mar 01, 2010 at 12:40:47 pm EST It's been happening a lot recently... - Thorcules - Sat Feb 27, 2010 at 12:27:30 pm EST The 7rd Annual X-Couples Survey Results - Evil G:DR - Sat Feb 27, 2010 at 04:43:42 am EST Re: The 7rd Annual X-Couples Survey Results - The Black Guardian - Sat Feb 27, 2010 at 04:42:44 pm EST Re: The 7rd Annual X-Couples Survey Results - Evil G:DR - Sun Feb 28, 2010 at 06:19:49 am EST Re: The 7rd Annual X-Couples Survey Results - Omar Karindu - Sat Feb 27, 2010 at 11:44:59 pm EST Re: The 7rd Annual X-Couples Survey Results - Menshevik - Sun Feb 28, 2010 at 06:53:14 am EST Re: The 7rd Annual X-Couples Survey Results - The Black Guardian - Mon Mar 01, 2010 at 11:36:09 pm EST Re: The 7rd Annual X-Couples Survey Results - Omar Karindu - Tue Mar 02, 2010 at 09:38:51 am EST Responses to Results, or "How I Met Your X-Mother" - Arsenal - Sat Feb 27, 2010 at 06:27:29 am EST Responses to response to Results, or "robots are people, too" - Evil G:DR - Sat Feb 27, 2010 at 08:14:07 am EST Re: Responses to response to Results, or "robots are people, too" - Xorneto2 - Sun Feb 28, 2010 at 06:24:44 pm EST Re: Responses to response to Results, or "robots are people, too" - Evil G:DR - Sat Mar 06, 2010 at 05:18:41 am EST Responses to the third power, or "The Revenge of Lockhead" - Arsenal - Sun Feb 28, 2010 at 01:36:03 am EST Re: Responses to the 4rd power, or "The Legend of Skeletor's Ghost" - Evil G:DR - Sat Mar 06, 2010 at 11:05:51 am EST Re: Responses to response to Results, or "robots are people, too" - TJ Burns - Sun Feb 28, 2010 at 12:31:59 am EST Re: Responses to response to Results, or "robots are people, too" - Evil G:DR - Sun Feb 28, 2010 at 06:33:23 am EST Re: Responses to response to Results, or "robots are people, too" - Michael - Sun Feb 28, 2010 at 03:47:34 pm EST Re: Responses to response to Results, or "robots are people, too" - askani - Mon Mar 01, 2010 at 02:38:43 pm EST Re: Responses to response to Results, or "robots are people, too" - Michael - Mon Mar 01, 2010 at 07:58:21 pm EST Re: Responses to response to Results, or "robots are people, too" - askani - Tue Mar 02, 2010 at 12:39:42 pm EST Re: Responses to response to Results, or "robots are people, too" - Evil G:DR - Sat Mar 06, 2010 at 05:07:11 am EST First fastball special? - emerick-man - Fri Feb 26, 2010 at 10:18:03 pm EST Re: First fastball special? - The Black Guardian - Sat Feb 27, 2010 at 12:01:36 am EST Subscription - Dorothy Z - Fri Feb 26, 2010 at 01:26:06 am EST Xmen Legacy 233... [Spoilers] - emerick-man - Thu Feb 25, 2010 at 10:51:57 pm EST Re: Xmen Legacy 233... [Spoilers] - Dark Marvel - Fri Feb 26, 2010 at 07:44:01 am EST Re: Xmen Legacy 233... [Spoilers] - The Black Guardian - Fri Feb 26, 2010 at 03:15:17 pm EST Re: Xmen Legacy 233... [Spoilers] - Thorcules - Fri Feb 26, 2010 at 10:30:49 pm EST Re: Xmen Legacy 233... [Spoilers] - The Black Guardian - Fri Feb 26, 2010 at 11:39:59 pm EST Re: Xmen Legacy 233... [Spoilers] - Evil G:DR - Sat Feb 27, 2010 at 04:05:53 am EST Re: Proteus and Superman... [Spoilers] - emerick-man - Sat Feb 27, 2010 at 06:10:58 am EST Star TreX [Spoilers] - The Black Guardian - Sat Feb 27, 2010 at 05:04:25 pm EST Re: Xmen Legacy 233... [Spoilers] - The Black Guardian - Thu Feb 25, 2010 at 11:58:16 pm EST I liked the issue: the art is great! [Spoilers] - Thorcules - Thu Feb 25, 2010 at 11:24:29 pm EST Matt Fraction on Uncanny and Second Coming [Spoilers] - Lightning Strike - Thu Feb 25, 2010 at 07:50:31 pm EST Re: Matt Fraction on Uncanny and Second Coming [Spoilers] - eugenio abraham: the ex exposed guy - Thu Feb 25, 2010 at 08:13:26 pm EST Re: Matt Fraction on Uncanny and Second Coming [Spoilers] - Flint - Fri Feb 26, 2010 at 10:59:28 am EST Re: Matt Fraction on Uncanny and Second Coming [Spoilers] - Unstable Molecule - Fri Feb 26, 2010 at 03:05:31 pm EST Re: Matt Fraction on Uncanny and Second Coming [Spoilers] - yikes - Fri Feb 26, 2010 at 06:52:11 pm EST Nation X #3... [Spoilers] - eugenio abraham: the ex exposed guy - Thu Feb 25, 2010 at 11:38:11 am EST Re: Um, Could You Tell Us The Main Stories? (no text) [Spoilers] - Comicguy1 - Thu Feb 25, 2010 at 02:01:37 pm EST Re: Um, Could You Tell Us The Main Stories? [Spoilers] - eugenio abraham: the ex exposed guy - Thu Feb 25, 2010 at 02:33:08 pm EST Re: Um, Could You Tell Us The Main Stories? [Spoilers] - The Black Guardian - Thu Feb 25, 2010 at 02:20:58 pm EST so they kill another member of alpha flight : ( (no text) [Spoilers] - Oldman - Thu Feb 25, 2010 at 06:34:35 pm EST Re: so they kill another member of alpha flight : ( [Spoilers] - The Black Guardian - Thu Feb 25, 2010 at 11:28:55 pm EST Re: so they kill another member of alpha flight : ( [Spoilers] - Thorcules - Sat Feb 27, 2010 at 04:21:23 pm EST Re: Um, Could You Tell Us The Main Stories? [Spoilers] - eugenio abraham: the ex exposed guy - Thu Feb 25, 2010 at 02:36:50 pm EST Second Coming Prepare! [Spoilers] - Domixt - Thu Feb 25, 2010 at 08:36:20 am EST| 1 2 3 16 29 42 55 68 81 94 107 120 >> |
|
All Marvel characters and titles are ™ and © Marvel Comics Group, Inc.
Their names and images are used without permission. |
| On Topic™ v2.1 © 2003-2010 Powermad Software |
