Avengers >> View Thread

Author
Jay23


Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 1,825



Posted with Mozilla Firefox 38.0 on Windows 7
Reverend Meteor





Posted with Mozilla Firefox 35.0 on Windows 7
The Black Guardian

Moderator

Location: Paragon City, RI
Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008


Bring back The Council of Cross-Time Kangs, with female and alien Kangs.

Kang isn't Nathaniel any old way.




City of Heroes is BACK!
Posted with Mozilla Firefox 38.0 on Windows 8
Reverend Meteor





    Quote:
    Bring back The Council of Cross-Time Kangs, with female and alien Kangs.



    Quote:
    Kang isn't Nathaniel any old way.


I know he isn't the Nathaniel that is Reed's father but isn't Kang another Nathaniel Richards descended from Reed's half-brother?


Posted with Mozilla Firefox 35.0 on Windows 7
The Black Guardian

Moderator

Location: Paragon City, RI
Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008


One identity seems just as much a retcon as any other. Let the FF movies have their Rama Tut if they want him. Let the Avengers have Kang.

I prefer Kang as just some random crazy time-traveling despot. There's zero need to have him be any relation to Reed... or Doom.




City of Heroes is BACK!
Posted with Mozilla Firefox 38.0 on Windows 8
Omar Karindu


Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 4,242


Yet, bafflingly, Marvel still got to use Ronan the Accuser, who first appeared in Fantastic Four.




- Omar Karindu
"For your information, I don't have an ego. My Facebook photo is a landscape."
Posted with Apple Safari 7.1.6 on MacOS X
bd2999

Moderator

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008





God, these deals that Marvel made early on just keep coming back and kicking them. I mean they did not know they would be making their own films but given the library of characters they gave the movie rights up to it is just sort of hamstringing some of the potential directions they can go.

Not that I think Kang is immediately viable anyway. Given the fact that if he showed up in the Avengers 3 two parter he would be a lackey of Thanos at best. Unless they made him a competitor for the gems.

To bad, he is a potentially cool villain to use.




Look Raist bunnies...
Posted with Google Chrome 43.0.2357.81 on Windows 7
The Black Guardian

Moderator

Location: Paragon City, RI
Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008


Inhumans
Ronan
Etc.




City of Heroes is BACK!
Posted with Mozilla Firefox 38.0 on Windows 8
JesusFan


Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008


But not Skrulls, as that would be epci, to have those 2 raves square off!


Posted with Mozilla Firefox 38.0 on Linux
JesusFan


Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008


Even more so then Kang, can you see Doom tryting to gain gems for himself, but they cannot have him appear either!


Posted with Mozilla Firefox 38.0 on Linux
Reverend Meteor





    Quote:
    But not Skrulls, as that would be epci, to have those 2 raves square off!


I'm still mad that the Shiturdi were used in Avengers and not the Skrulls.


Posted with Mozilla Firefox 35.0 on Windows 7
Superman's Pal

Moderator

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 5,251



    Quote:
    Yet, bafflingly, Marvel still got to use Ronan the Accuser, who first appeared in Fantastic Four.

And Black Panther, who first appeared in FF. And the Inhumans.

Strangely, Fox has the rights to Wolverine even though he first appeared in The Incredible Hulk.

Sony doesn't have the Punisher even though he first appeared in Spider-Man.

I guess some characters were spelled out in the deals and some weren't.



Posted with Google Chrome 43.0.2357.81 on Windows 7
JesusFan




Think fox has their rights!


Posted with Mozilla Firefox 38.0 on Linux

Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2021 Powermad Software