Comic Battle - Is Marvel Hercues Now Physically Stronger Than Top tiered DC

Post By

JesusFan

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008

Subj: Is Marvel Hercues Now Physically Stronger Than Top tiered DC Beings?
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 06:32:36 am EDT (Viewed 223 times)

NewEmailPrintRSSIndex

Next >>

Based upon what is being said/shown now about Herc...

Is He to be considered stronger than likes of Supes/WW/BA etc now?

Posted with Microsoft Internet Explorer 7 on Windows Vista

NewEmailPrintRSSIndex

Is Marvel Hercues Now Physically Stronger Than Top tiered DC Beings? · JesusFan · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 06:32:36 am EDT
- Re: Is Marvel Hercues Now Physically Stronger Than Top tiered DC Beings? · bd2999 · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 03:36:14 pm EDT
- Re: Is Marvel Hercues Now Physically Stronger Than Top tiered DC Beings? · J · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 02:34:49 pm EDT
  - How much did the Spectre weigh? nt. (no text) · Amor Fati · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 03:26:10 pm EDT
    - Who knows? And it's why lifting the specter is not a usable feat. (no text) · Would be Watcher · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 03:58:51 pm EDT
    - Less than the Moon, in my opinion -- seeing as how he crashed on it and it remained in orbit and intact. (no text) · rc · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 03:34:01 pm EDT
      - Re: Less than the Moon, in my opinion -- seeing as how he crashed on it and it remained in orbit and intact. · J · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 03:37:18 pm EDT
        
        Re: Less than the Moon, in my opinion -- seeing as how he crashed on it and it remained in orbit and intact. · rc · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 03:39:40 pm EDT
        
        Re: Less than the Moon, in my opinion -- seeing as how he crashed on it and it remained in orbit and intact. · J · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 03:42:11 pm EDT
        
        Re: Less than the Moon, in my opinion -- seeing as how he crashed on it and it remained in orbit and intact. · rc · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 03:45:34 pm EDT
        
        Re: Less than the Moon, in my opinion -- seeing as how he crashed on it and it remained in orbit and intact. · J · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 03:49:58 pm EDT
        
        Re: Less than the Moon, in my opinion -- seeing as how he crashed on it and it remained in orbit and intact. · rc · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 03:55:06 pm EDT
        
        Re: Less than the Moon, in my opinion -- seeing as how he crashed on it and it remained in orbit and intact. · Primetime. · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 04:06:51 pm EDT
        
        Re: Less than the Moon, in my opinion -- seeing as how he crashed on it and it remained in orbit and intact. · rc · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 08:07:47 pm EDT
        
        Re: Less than the Moon, in my opinion -- seeing as how he crashed on it and it remained in orbit and intact. · J · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 03:58:23 pm EDT
        
        Re: Less than the Moon, in my opinion -- seeing as how he crashed on it and it remained in orbit and intact. · atrimus · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 04:40:58 pm EDT
        
        Re: Less than the Moon, in my opinion -- seeing as how he crashed on it and it remained in orbit and intact. · J · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 04:53:43 pm EDT
        
        Re: Less than the Moon, in my opinion -- seeing as how he crashed on it and it remained in orbit and intact. · ArtTeacher · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 05:00:01 pm EDT
        
        agreed... · Braugi · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 05:02:56 pm EDT
        
        Re: Couldn't have said it better. (no text) · atrimus · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 05:11:06 pm EDT
        
        Re: Less than the Moon, in my opinion -- seeing as how he crashed on it and it remained in orbit and intact. · J · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 05:02:42 pm EDT
        
        Twizzlers · ArtTeacher · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 05:19:13 pm EDT
        umm...you do know that beams often give out... · Braugi · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 05:06:07 pm EDT
        
        Re: umm...you do know that beams often give out... · Destroyer · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 05:41:10 pm EDT
        Re: umm...you do know that beams often give out... · J · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 05:07:35 pm EDT
        
        I never said anything about this feat in particular, but was responding... · Braugi · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 09:28:46 pm EDT
        Re: umm...you do know that beams often give out... · Olympian · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 06:06:21 pm EDT
        Re: umm...you do know that beams often give out... · Destroyer · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 05:42:36 pm EDT
        
        the SKY isn't tangible. nt · J · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 05:54:51 pm EDT
        
        Myth = fable, Comic book = made up storytelling. You = real world physics. One does not compute with the others (nt) · Olympian · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 06:01:14 pm EDT
        
        That's beside the point... · Would be Watcher · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 08:05:17 pm EDT
        
        No, its not. · Olympian · Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 03:12:51 am EDT
        
        People of Marvel earth... · Would be Watcher · Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 07:04:29 am EDT
        
        Oh, for the love of.... · Olympian · Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 11:56:42 am EDT
        
        No.... · Would be Watcher · Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 12:15:08 pm EDT
        
        So do you validate Superman's heralded "contained a black hole" feat since... · Primetime. · Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 03:04:50 pm EDT
        
        Black holes · rc · Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 03:57:35 pm EDT
        
        Re: Black holes · J · Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 04:39:27 pm EDT
        
        Oprah · ArtTeacher · Thu Sep 25, 2008 at 01:01:31 am EDT
        
        Re: Oprah · rc · Thu Sep 25, 2008 at 11:40:36 am EDT
        
        Re: Black holes · rc · Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 09:57:22 pm EDT
        
        Re: No.... · Olympian · Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 12:29:13 pm EDT
        
        I'll do my best (no text) · Would be Watcher · Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 12:36:06 pm EDT
        
        Exactly. (no text) · SuperJ · Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 09:59:25 am EDT
        
        Re: umm...you do know that beams often give out... · ArtTeacher · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 05:17:39 pm EDT
        Re: umm...you do know that beams often give out... · Amor Fati · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 05:13:29 pm EDT
        
        Great point. And razor sharp. *N/T* · ArtTeacher · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 05:22:22 pm EDT
        Re: umm...you do know that beams often give out... · atrimus · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 05:17:16 pm EDT
        
        Another good point! *N/T* · ArtTeacher · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 05:22:48 pm EDT
    - Re: How much did the Spectre weigh? nt. · J · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 03:32:26 pm EDT
      - Eternity is a measurement of time, there is no physical reference NT · Zeeder · Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 10:06:06 am EDT
      - Re: How much did the Spectre weigh? nt. · Olympian · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 05:45:19 pm EDT
      - Re: "A cosmic consciousness that contains Eternity itself. And Eternity... is heavy" sounds pretty much like the "Universe" to me · atrimus · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 03:47:49 pm EDT
        
        Thats how i see it. Either accept all of the kind, or none. · Olympian · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 05:40:56 pm EDT
        Re: "A cosmic consciousness that contains Eternity itself. And Eternity... is heavy" sounds pretty much like the "Universe" to me · J · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 03:53:39 pm EDT
        
        Re: "A cosmic consciousness that contains Eternity itself. And Eternity... is heavy" sounds pretty much like the "Universe" to me · Destroyer · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 05:47:27 pm EDT
        Re: "A cosmic consciousness that contains Eternity itself. And Eternity... is heavy" sounds pretty much like the "Universe" to me · Olympian · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 04:58:02 pm EDT
        
        Re: "A cosmic consciousness that contains Eternity itself. And Eternity... is heavy" sounds pretty much like the "Universe" to me · J · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 05:04:52 pm EDT
        
        Re: "A cosmic consciousness that contains Eternity itself. And Eternity... is heavy" sounds pretty much like the "Universe" to me · Olympian · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 05:18:18 pm EDT
  - Re: Is Marvel Hercues Now Physically Stronger Than Top tiered DC Beings? · Olympian · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 03:05:37 pm EDT
  - Indeed, to think he literally held up the universe is just absurd (no text) · Hatman · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 02:54:53 pm EDT
- Wait! What did he do? · autochron · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 01:52:28 pm EDT
  - Re: Wait! What did he do? · Olympian · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 02:10:56 pm EDT
- Re: Is Marvel Hercues Now Physically Stronger Than Top tiered DC Beings? · atrimus · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 12:36:02 pm EDT
  - Now this... · Olympian · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 12:40:24 pm EDT
    - I don't agree completly... · Would be Watcher · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 03:25:19 pm EDT
      - Re: I don't agree completly... · Olympian · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 05:01:41 pm EDT
        
        I think you don't get it or worse don't want to get it... · Would be Watcher · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 10:54:26 pm EDT
        
        Likewise, and if you had read what i already wrote about this, you likely would complicate matters so much :) · Olympian · Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 03:27:42 am EDT
        
        I see it's don't want to... · Would be Watcher · Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 07:37:44 am EDT
        
        *shakes head* why do even read comics at all, Watcher? · Olympian · Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 11:59:29 am EDT
        
        Lets not mix things up... · Would be Watcher · Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 12:25:38 pm EDT
        
        Re: Lets not mix things up... · Olympian · Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 12:34:04 pm EDT
        
        Sure no problem (no text) · Would be Watcher · Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 12:37:05 pm EDT
- No. He's not "now" stronger...he always has been--we're just now seeing proof. LOL! *N/T* · ArtTeacher · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 12:35:16 pm EDT
- Re: Is Marvel Hercues Now Physically Stronger Than Top tiered DC Beings? · Olympian · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 09:53:53 am EDT
- It's an impossible to answer question unless you volontary decide to fill the blank with something (no text) · Would be Watcher · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 09:44:17 am EDT
- Assuming he literally benched the universe, and limiting your analysis to that feat only, then, yes, he is far more powerful than Superman (and everyone else). (no text) · rc · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 09:20:21 am EDT
- It is very difficult to compare companies, because you have to base · Braugi · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 09:05:50 am EDT
  - I came to a Hercules thread and a WW fight broke out. LOL! *N/T* · ArtTeacher · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 04:41:32 pm EDT
    - As commander of the Amazons, J is always ready! (nt) · Olympian · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 05:30:42 pm EDT
  - Re: It is very difficult to compare companies, because you have to base · J · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 11:50:55 am EDT
    - Re: It is very difficult to compare companies, because you have to base · Poltargyst · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 11:49:24 pm EDT
    - Don't want to get involved in this, But.... · Daveym · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 04:22:51 pm EDT
      - Re: Don't want to get involved in this, But.... · Olympian · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 05:21:59 pm EDT
        
        Re: Don't want to get involved in this, But.... · Daveym · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 05:55:55 pm EDT
        
        Re: Don't want to get involved in this, But.... · Fifthchild · Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 12:01:55 am EDT
        Re: Don't want to get involved in this, But.... · Olympian · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 06:15:15 pm EDT
      - completely agree... · J · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 04:29:17 pm EDT
    - Re: It is very difficult to compare companies, because you have to base · Primetime. · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 02:00:15 pm EDT
      - Re: It is very difficult to compare companies, because you have to base · J · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 02:29:33 pm EDT
        
        Yes, lets read this down shall we? · Olympian · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 03:08:49 pm EDT
        Re: It is very difficult to compare companies, because you have to base · Primetime. · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 02:37:08 pm EDT
        
        Re: It is very difficult to compare companies, because you have to base · J · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 02:55:14 pm EDT
        
        Re: It is very difficult to compare companies, because you have to base · Primetime. · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 03:20:09 pm EDT
        
        Re: It is very difficult to compare companies, because you have to base · J · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 03:36:04 pm EDT
        
        Re: It is very difficult to compare companies, because you have to base · Olympian · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 05:53:14 pm EDT
        Re: It is very difficult to compare companies, because you have to base · Primetime. · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 04:03:18 pm EDT
        
        Re: It is very difficult to compare companies, because you have to base · J · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 04:09:01 pm EDT
        
        Re: It is very difficult to compare companies, because you have to base · Primetime · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 07:04:28 pm EDT
        Re: It is very difficult to compare companies, because you have to base · Olympian · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 05:08:20 pm EDT
    - Re: It is very difficult to compare companies, because you have to base · Olympian · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 12:34:15 pm EDT
    - according to JLA/Avengers, She Hulk and Wonder Woman can take down Surtur... · Braugi · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 12:01:22 pm EDT
      - Re: according to JLA/Avengers, She Hulk and Wonder Woman can take down Surtur... · J · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 12:29:27 pm EDT
        
        Re: according to JLA/Avengers, She Hulk and Wonder Woman can take down Surtur... · Olympian · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 12:36:24 pm EDT
  - Re: It is very difficult to compare companies, because you have to base · paolo · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 11:25:07 am EDT
- Re: Is Marvel Hercues Now Physically Stronger Than Top tiered DC Beings? · Bootch · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 07:30:56 am EDT
  - We all know that the DC Universe is heavier than Marvel Universe! n/t · VaderTime · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 01:18:03 pm EDT
  - Re: Is Marvel Hercues Now Physically Stronger Than Top tiered DC Beings? · Destroyer · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 10:04:12 am EDT
    - What? That's absurd... · autochron · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 01:59:27 pm EDT
      - Remember, kids, PC Superman destroying a solar system with a sneeze = awesome, Herc's feat = ridiculous. :) *N/T* · ArtTeacher · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 04:58:21 pm EDT
        
        As far as I'm concerned they are both ridiculous (no text) · Would be Watcher · Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 12:28:34 pm EDT
        Herc doesn't seem so silly anymore... · autochron · Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 12:12:52 am EDT
      - And THAT is the question! · Would be Watcher · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 03:30:29 pm EDT
        
        Re: And THAT is the question! · Olympian · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 05:37:54 pm EDT
        
        Well it sure was stupid back then... · Would be Watcher · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 10:33:26 pm EDT
        
        Re: Well it sure was stupid back then... · Olympian · Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 03:35:29 am EDT
      - Re: What? That's absurd... · Olympian · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 02:07:34 pm EDT
    - Re: Is Marvel Hercues Now Physically Stronger Than Top tiered DC Beings? · Bootch · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 11:32:13 am EDT
      - Re: Is Marvel Hercues Now Physically Stronger Than Top tiered DC Beings? · Destroyer · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 12:16:03 pm EDT
  - Bootch is in shock and denial. Quick, Maestro, where are the painkillers? · Olympian · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 09:47:58 am EDT
    - LOL! Bravo. Good show, chap! :) *N/T* · ArtTeacher · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 12:33:33 pm EDT
    - Shock and denial about what? · Bootch · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 11:30:00 am EDT
      - Re: Shock and denial about what? · Olympian · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 12:38:17 pm EDT
        
        About denial... · Bootch · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 03:28:38 pm EDT
        
        Re: About denial... · Olympian · Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 05:29:21 pm EDT