DS has a contarct paid to bring in DP, dead or alive!

nt

It's interesting that a hero/villain performs one amazing feat, or use a power they haven't used for 20+ years, and that automatically propels them to a high status despite scans and evidence to the contrary. I don't know what is worse, selective feat picking that has only been done once or twice 20, or more, years ago or ignoring evidence from scans or the lack thereof. We need to stop putting our favorite heroes/villains on pedestals and start putting them where they really belong. But it's evident that people never will because they would rather accuse others of cherry picking feats, when they don't, and being 'morally superior' when they aren't. I guess being honest and as fair as possible only opens one up to being the target of childish accusations and fault finding by those who insist on acting petty and childish. What happened to a good debate between two civil, mature, adults?

Chop his head off, then burn the body and spread the ashes to the four corners of the Earth

It's interesting that a hero/villain performs one amazing feat, or use a power they haven't used for 20+ years, and that automatically propels them to a high status despite scans and evidence to the contrary. I don't know what is worse, selective feat picking that has only been done once or twice 20, or more, years ago or ignoring evidence from scans or the lack thereof. We need to stop putting our favorite heroes/villains on pedestals and start putting them where they really belong. But it's evident that people never will because they would rather accuse others of cherry picking feats, when they don't, and being 'morally superior' when they aren't. I guess being honest and as fair as possible only opens one up to being the target of childish accusations and fault finding by those who insist on acting petty and childish. What happened to a good debate between two civil, mature, adults?

Quote:

Chop his head off, then burn the body and spread the ashes to the four corners of the Earth

That still won't stop him really. He's had his head chopped off. He's had all his limbs separated. He's been reduced to ashes.

The fake will win because he just won't die. The bad characters never do.

I highly doubt Deadpool can magically summon all his limbs and body parts from the four corners of the world. And even if he could, Deathstroke is a master strategist and would have thought of that. So, if Deadpool truly can't be stopped even that way then he's given a fate worse than death because he can't go anywhere. Trapped forever underground in coffins of Adamantium.

But by the offchance even that won't stop Deadpool from coming back, Deathstroke simply steals the phantom zone projector and banishes the fake into the Phantom Zone. Trust me, Deathstroke would find a way. Can't kill him? Then make sure Deadpool experiences the next best thing to death. Let's see him try and get out of an Adamantium coffin.

It's interesting that a hero/villain performs one amazing feat, or use a power they haven't used for 20+ years, and that automatically propels them to a high status despite scans and evidence to the contrary. I don't know what is worse, selective feat picking that has only been done once or twice 20, or more, years ago or ignoring evidence from scans or the lack thereof. We need to stop putting our favorite heroes/villains on pedestals and start putting them where they really belong. But it's evident that people never will because they would rather accuse others of cherry picking feats, when they don't, and being 'morally superior' when they aren't. I guess being honest and as fair as possible only opens one up to being the target of childish accusations and fault finding by those who insist on acting petty and childish. What happened to a good debate between two civil, mature, adults?

Attachments

Deadpool Annual (2013) (digital-Empire) 011.jpg (1988 x 1528)

Quote:

I highly doubt Deadpool can magically summon all his limbs and body parts from the four corners of the world. And even if he could, Deathstroke is a master strategist and would have thought of that. So, if Deadpool truly can't be stopped even that way then he's given a fate worse than death because he can't go anywhere. Trapped forever underground in coffins of Adamantium.

Ah but he would have to have the coffins of adamantium constructed BEFORE his fight with Deadpool.

And in that situation

1) He wouldn't have the adamantium on his earth

2) If he was on Deadpool's earth he would have to track down a metallurgist to construct the coffins thus costing him precious time while Deadpool stabs him to death

Quote:
But by the offchance even that won't stop Deadpool from coming back, Deathstroke simply steals the phantom zone projector and banishes the fake into the Phantom Zone. Trust me, Deathstroke would find a way. Can't kill him? Then make sure Deadpool experiences the next best thing to death. Let's see him try and get out of an Adamantium coffin.

Yeah ok we can just invent dumb stuff. Deadpool just goes gets the Ultimate Nullifer and nullifies Slade out of existence. I can play that game too.

But it does not seem as if Thor and Daredevil spread their ashes for the seven winds.

Slade likely would.

Might make it harder for Deadpool to come back within a reasonable time.

Quote:
Ah but he would have to have the coffins of adamantium constructed BEFORE his fight with Deadpool.

Deathstroke is always a planner. Thus, he would have them constructed before his fight with Deadpool. Deathstroke is rarely unprepared for anything.

Quote:
1) He wouldn't have the adamantium on his earth

2) If he was on Deadpool's earth he would have to track down a metallurgist to construct the coffins thus costing him precious time while Deadpool stabs him to death

See, that's the thing. When Deathstroke has a plan, he makes sure he has back ups and contingencies in place BEFORE the fight. So Deadpool wouldn't even get the chance to stab him to death before being taken out. If this fight is on DC Earth, Deathstroke will construct a trap that is just as durable. He always plans ahead. How do you think he's done so well against guys above his weight class?

If Deathstroke can embarrass Superman in a fight, twice, he's more than capable of handling someone like Deadpool.

Quote:
Yeah ok we can just invent dumb stuff. Deadpool just goes gets the Ultimate Nullifer and nullifies Slade out of existence. I can play that game too.

It's not dumb if it's one of the only ways to put down Deadpool. If you cannot keep this civil without saying childish crap like, "invent dumb stuff" then this debate is over. I have no time or patience for someone who resorts to childish crap. Knock it off. With that said, this debate is over. I have a right to my opinion, you don't like it then don't read it. You think it's dumb stuff, then don't read it, there is NO need for that crap on this board.

It's interesting that a hero/villain performs one amazing feat, or use a power they haven't used for 20+ years, and that automatically propels them to a high status despite scans and evidence to the contrary. I don't know what is worse, selective feat picking that has only been done once or twice 20, or more, years ago or ignoring evidence from scans or the lack thereof. We need to stop putting our favorite heroes/villains on pedestals and start putting them where they really belong. But it's evident that people never will because they would rather accuse others of cherry picking feats, when they don't, and being 'morally superior' when they aren't. I guess being honest and as fair as possible only opens one up to being the target of childish accusations and fault finding by those who insist on acting petty and childish. What happened to a good debate between two civil, mature, adults?

I think Thanos has cursed Wade with immortality because he's jealous Death likes Wade more. He's just not going to stay dead.

Quote:
It's not dumb if it's one of the only ways to put down Deadpool. If you cannot keep this civil without saying childish crap like, "invent dumb stuff" then this debate is over. I have no time or patience for someone who resorts to childish crap. Knock it off. With that said, this debate is over. I have a right to my opinion, you don't like it then don't read it. You think it's dumb stuff, then don't read it, there is NO need for that crap on this board.

How could I say otherwise. Your answers were literally adamantium coffins and phantom zone projectors. Give Deathstroke an Infinity Gauntlet and a mother box for no reason while you're at it. You don't like criticism...stop saying weird stuff.

Reverend Meteor (not apologizing)

I could have handled this better, but didn't. So I apologize for failing to do that much. I came on a little too defensively and for that I am sorry. But hey, at least one of us apologized for the wrong that was done. I wish you could have done the same for the part you know you played but I cannot change you, only you can do that.

Have a nice day.

It's interesting that a hero/villain performs one amazing feat, or use a power they haven't used for 20+ years, and that automatically propels them to a high status despite scans and evidence to the contrary. I don't know what is worse, selective feat picking that has only been done once or twice 20, or more, years ago or ignoring evidence from scans or the lack thereof. We need to stop putting our favorite heroes/villains on pedestals and start putting them where they really belong. But it's evident that people never will because they would rather accuse others of cherry picking feats, when they don't, and being 'morally superior' when they aren't. I guess being honest and as fair as possible only opens one up to being the target of childish accusations and fault finding by those who insist on acting petty and childish. What happened to a good debate between two civil, mature, adults?

Quote:
It's not dumb if it's one of the only ways to put down Deadpool. If you cannot keep this civil without saying childish crap like, "invent dumb stuff" then this debate is over. I have no time or patience for someone who resorts to childish crap. Knock it off. With that said, this debate is over. I have a right to my opinion, you don't like it then don't read it. You think it's dumb stuff, then don't read it, there is NO need for that crap on this board.

Do you even read the signature you created that you include in your own posts?

You admonish others for challenging you and cherry picking their facts. You cite examples and they ignore you and ignore the scan you provide.

How did I not do the very thing you complain in your signature that people do to you? You cherry picked. You did this selective feat picking you accuse others of.

I defended my opinion. You defend your opinion. You get frustrated when people don't agree with you. I can't help that. If I was rude it's because you have a do as I say but don't do as I do attitude.

Your signature:
It's interesting that a hero/villain performs one amazing feat, or use a power they haven't used for 20+ years, and that automatically propels them to a high status despite scans and evidence to the contrary. I don't know what is worse, selective feat picking that has only been done once or twice 20, or more, years ago or ignoring evidence from scans or the lack thereof. We need to stop putting our favorite heroes/villains on pedestals and start putting them where they really belong. But it's evident that people never will because they would rather accuse others of cherry picking feats, when they don't, and being 'morally superior' when they aren't. I guess being honest and as fair as possible only opens one up to being the target of childish accusations and fault finding by those who insist on acting petty and childish. What happened to a good debate between two civil, mature, adults?[/font>

Quote:
Do you even read the signature you created that you include in your own posts?

Obviously you didn't.

Quote:
You admonish others for challenging you and cherry picking their facts. You cite examples and they ignore you and ignore the scan you provide.

So? People willfully blind themselves to the evidence and I'm not afraid to call them out on that. Ever have a debate with someone who thinks their favorite hero is invincible and no matter what you say, or how many scans you show to prove otherwise, they won't believe it? It's those type of people who blind themselves.

Quote:
How did I not do the very thing you complain in your signature that people do to you? You cherry picked. You did this selective feat picking you accuse others of.

No I didn't. No where in our debate did I mention a specific feat for either character. See, your now accusing me of feat picking when I never named one specifically on either side. If there literally is only one way to deal with a character, how else am I supposed to approach it? That's not cherry picking dude, that's coming up with something that can deal with a character who literally cannot die. If you have a better way to answer how to deal with Deaedpool then I'd love to hear it. Careful, though, I might accuse you of cherry picking feats.

Quote:
I defended my opinion. You defend your opinion. You get frustrated when people don't agree with you. I can't help that. If I was rude it's because you have a do as I say but don't do as I do attitude.

I don't see how I have that attitude as I have never expected others to do as I say. You were rude because you thought I was making weird comments and had to act snide about it, so stop trying to make this about what I said in my signature when you know this has nothing to do with that. You sir are making things up because your angry with me. So I'd appreciate it that you please stop twisting my words to mean something I never meant them to mean. Now, if you can't say anything nice then let me offer you a piece of advice: don't say it at all.

See, this only proves my point. Since my opinion obviously bothers you that much, then your better off not reading it. Especially since you insist on looking at it in through colored vision and not for what it really is.

After someone apologizes to you, do you treat them all the way you just treated me? Instead of apologizing for your part, your doing nothing more than to continue to criticize me simply for my opinion. And when that happens, it's no longer called criticism. It's called tearing someone down. But I get it, your mad and you need to vent so you chose me as the victim. Well, go ahead and vent. Rip me a new one because I'm done paying attention to you. For someone who has "Reverend" in their name, you sure don't act like it. So, if you insist on acting like this, then you can continue to do so at freakin' the wall because I'm done with this.

It's interesting that a hero/villain performs one amazing feat, or use a power they haven't used for 20+ years, and that automatically propels them to a high status despite scans and evidence to the contrary. I don't know what is worse, selective feat picking that has only been done once or twice 20, or more, years ago or ignoring evidence from scans or the lack thereof. We need to stop putting our favorite heroes/villains on pedestals and start putting them where they really belong. But it's evident that people never will because they would rather accuse others of cherry picking feats, when they don't, and being 'morally superior' when they aren't. I guess being honest and as fair as possible only opens one up to being the target of childish accusations and fault finding by those who insist on acting petty and childish. What happened to a good debate between two civil, mature, adults?

And Im convinced he's faster and a better fighter.

Deathstroke would most likely win in a DC comic (especially his own if he still has it), while Deadpool would have the advantage in his comics.

Probably would not be serious fight in the latter case, but be more treated as a joke.