|
|
|
Tiamat
Location: Orlando
Member Since: Thu May 21, 2009
Posts: 1,020
|
Subject: I would really like to be excited, but…( Thanos: Siblings)
Posted Fri Jul 28, 2017 at 03:47:20 pm EDT (Viewed 386 times) |
|
|
Posted with Apple Safari 6.1.6 on MacOS X
|
Reverend Meteor
Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 10,334
|
Subject: Re: I would really like to be excited, but…( Thanos: Siblings) [Re: Tiamat]
Posted Fri Jul 28, 2017 at 11:23:09 pm EDT (Viewed 302 times) |
|
|
Quote: Starlin's Last few efforts were just not good.
Quote: And that is coming from one of his biggest fans.
Quote: https://www.bleedingcool.com/2017/07/28/thanos-the-infinity-siblings-trilogy/
ugh I thought after the lame Thanos OGN's a while back Starlin was done with Thanos.
Posted with Mozilla Firefox 54.0 on Windows 10
|
riprap
Member Since: Tue Nov 24, 2009
Posts: 137
|
Subject: Re: I would really like to be excited, but…( Thanos: Siblings) [Re: Reverend Meteor]
Posted Sat Jul 29, 2017 at 08:27:08 pm EDT (Viewed 288 times) |
|
|
So the first three OGN's were not in continuity, right? Adam Warlock is not the Living Tribunal and Thanos is not with Mistress Death! I wonder if these new ones will be similar and not cannon? Also, I'd by anything by these two guys! They are too great to ignore!
Posted with Google Chrome 59.0.3071.115 on Windows NT 4.0
|
Reverend Meteor
Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 10,334
|
Subject: Re: I would really like to be excited, but…( Thanos: Siblings) [Re: riprap]
Posted Sun Jul 30, 2017 at 10:10:15 pm EDT (Viewed 265 times) |
|
|
Quote: So the first three OGN's were not in continuity, right? Adam Warlock is not the Living Tribunal and Thanos is not with Mistress Death! I wonder if these new ones will be similar and not cannon? Also, I'd by anything by these two guys! They are too great to ignore!
IMO if it was in continuity it got almost immediately excised from continuity with Secret Wars destroying and recreating the multiverse.
Posted with Mozilla Firefox 54.0 on Windows 10
|
Primetime
Member Since: Tue Dec 29, 2009
Posts: 225
|
Subject: Re: I would really like to be excited, but…( Thanos: Siblings) [Re: riprap]
Posted Mon Jul 31, 2017 at 03:09:07 pm EDT (Viewed 271 times) |
|
|
They're in continuity technically. They are just noticeably contradicted by other events. Ewing actually makes a reference to LT being reborn in Ultimates, which is clearly a reference to what Starlin wrote. It can be argued that the LT killed by Order/Chaos is the Warlock/LT.
Posted with Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0 on Windows 7
|
riprap
Member Since: Tue Nov 24, 2009
Posts: 137
|
Subject: Re: I would really like to be excited, but…( Thanos: Siblings) [Re: Primetime]
Posted Mon Jul 31, 2017 at 06:57:06 pm EDT (Viewed 281 times) |
|
|
In Ultimates #11 Thanos says, "Beautiful Death, to whom I once devoted my all. Perhaps somewhere, in the endless halls of being, some aspect of me is at her side..Content at last. Or perhaps THAT story, ended with the incursions." Possibly meaning that if the graphic novels happened, it was before the Secret Wars.
So I think that Ewing is a big continuity person and this is how he fit the OGN's in continuity!
Posted with Google Chrome 59.0.3071.115 on Windows NT 4.0
|
Primetime
Member Since: Tue Dec 29, 2009
Posts: 225
|
Subject: Re: I would really like to be excited, but…( Thanos: Siblings) [Re: riprap]
Posted Tue Aug 01, 2017 at 03:39:43 pm EDT (Viewed 254 times) |
|
|
You make good points. It's all a big jumble. Starlin doesn't really read current stuff and when he writes, he has to try and play catch-up. Marvel doesn't really make an effort to keep him abreast. I would say that we probably need to differentiate that which is in-continuity from that which is canon. Starlin's current work tends to be out of sync with continuity, but is officially canon.
Posted with Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0 on Windows 7
|
swmcbf
Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 2,887
|
Subject: Re: I would really like to be excited, but…( Thanos: Siblings) [Re: Tiamat]
Posted Tue Aug 01, 2017 at 07:56:00 pm EDT (Viewed 232 times) |
|
|
Well I guess the mystery adversary from the future is pretty obvious based on the cover.
Posted with Google Chrome 60.0.3112.78 on Windows 7
|
Reverend Meteor
Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 10,334
|
Subject: Re: I would really like to be excited, but…( Thanos: Siblings) [Re: Primetime]
Posted Wed Aug 02, 2017 at 11:34:13 am EDT (Viewed 275 times) |
|
|
Quote: You make good points. It's all a big jumble. Starlin doesn't really read current stuff and when he writes, he has to try and play catch-up. Marvel doesn't really make an effort to keep him abreast. I would say that we probably need to differentiate that which is in-continuity from that which is canon. Starlin's current work tends to be out of sync with continuity, but is officially canon.
I think he's said in interviews there are two Thanoses. The Thanos he uses and the one other writers use. I don't think he intends for his stuff to be in continuity anymore.
Posted with Mozilla Firefox 54.0 on Windows 7
|
bd2999
Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 15,561
|
Subject: Re: I would really like to be excited, but…( Thanos: Siblings) [Re: Tiamat]
Posted Fri Aug 04, 2017 at 04:59:09 pm EDT (Viewed 215 times) |
|
|
Quote: Starlin's Last few efforts were just not good.
Quote: And that is coming from one of his biggest fans.
Quote: https://www.bleedingcool.com/2017/07/28/thanos-the-infinity-siblings-trilogy/
I would rather he just stop with Thanos. His last few have been pretty bad with him. Just not good at all. Others have done a better or worse job but time to let it go.
Posted with Mozilla Firefox 54.0 on Windows 7
|
Rutro
Member Since: Fri Jan 16, 2009
Posts: 37
|
Subject: Re: I would really like to be excited, but…( Thanos: Siblings) [Re: Primetime]
Posted Wed Aug 16, 2017 at 01:36:56 pm EDT (Viewed 188 times) |
|
|
in one of the printed fan letters in a late rissue of the Ultimates, that same question about Walock was asked and the response was that they purposely left it vague but you could interpret that it was Warlock
Posted with Mozilla 11.0 on Windows 7
|