Marvel Universe >> View Thread

Author
Dayspring




Living Lightning - Anti-reg in CW #4-5, On the Texas Rangers (Avengers: The Initiative #2)

Firebird - Anti-reg in CW #4-5, On the Texas Rangers (Avengers: The Initiative #2)

Triathalon - Anti-reg in CW #4-5, At Camp Hammond (Avengers: The Initiative #1)

Justice - Anti-reg in CW #5, At Camp Hammond (Avengers: The Initiative #1)

Stingray - Anti-reg in CW #5, At Camp Hammond (Avengers: The Initiative #1)

Nighthawk - switched sides in CW #4

Stature - switched sides in CW #4

Invisible Woman - Took amnesty

Human Torch - Took amnesty

Hulkling - At Camp Hammond (Avengers: The Initiative #2)

the Falcon - Anti-reg in CW, registered (according to an article in Wizard)

Are there more that are known? (FYI, I posted this here on the Marvel U board and the Avengers board)


Posted with Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 on Windows 98
BlakGard




> Living Lightning - Anti-reg in CW #4-5, On the Texas Rangers
> (Avengers: The Initiative #2)
> Firebird - Anti-reg in CW #4-5, On the Texas Rangers (Avengers: The
> Initiative #2)
> Triathalon - Anti-reg in CW #4-5, At Camp Hammond (Avengers: The
> Initiative #1)
> Justice - Anti-reg in CW #5, At Camp Hammond (Avengers: The Initiative
> #1)
> Stingray - Anti-reg in CW #5, At Camp Hammond (Avengers: The
> Initiative #1)
> Nighthawk - switched sides in CW #4
> Stature - switched sides in CW #4
> Invisible Woman - Took amnesty
> Human Torch - Took amnesty
> Hulkling - At Camp Hammond (Avengers: The Initiative #2)
> the Falcon - Anti-reg in CW, registered (according to an article in
> Wizard)
> Are there more that are known? (FYI, I posted this here on the Marvel
> U board and the Avengers board)

A few from Battle Damage Report:

Arachne
BAD Girls, Inc. (Black Mamba, Asp, Diamondback)
Network
Phone Ranger
____________________



Posted with Netscape Navigator 8.1.3 on Windows XP
Dayspring




> > Living Lightning - Anti-reg in CW #4-5, On the Texas Rangers
> > (Avengers: The Initiative #2)
> > Firebird - Anti-reg in CW #4-5, On the Texas Rangers (Avengers: The
> > Initiative #2)
> > Triathalon - Anti-reg in CW #4-5, At Camp Hammond (Avengers: The
> > Initiative #1)
> > Justice - Anti-reg in CW #5, At Camp Hammond (Avengers: The Initiative
> > #1)
> > Stingray - Anti-reg in CW #5, At Camp Hammond (Avengers: The
> > Initiative #1)
> > Nighthawk - switched sides in CW #4
> > Stature - switched sides in CW #4
> > Invisible Woman - Took amnesty
> > Human Torch - Took amnesty
> > Hulkling - At Camp Hammond (Avengers: The Initiative #2)
> > the Falcon - Anti-reg in CW, registered (according to an article in
> > Wizard)
> > Are there more that are known? (FYI, I posted this here on the Marvel
> > U board and the Avengers board)
>
> A few from Battle Damage Report:
>
> Arachne
> BAD Girls, Inc. (Black Mamba, Asp, Diamondback)
> Network
> Phone Ranger

Phone Ranger? Phone Ranger?? That's the lamest name ever!
> ____________________
>


Posted with Mozilla Firefox 1.5.0.2 on Linux
Stingray




> Are there more that are known? (FYI, I posted this here on the Marvel U board and the Avengers board)

Marvel.com's Civil War entry in the Universe section has done a pretty good job of keeping the pro/anti-reg list up to date. I'd reccommend looking there.


Posted with Microsoft Internet Explorer 7 on Windows Vista
BlakGard




> > > Living Lightning - Anti-reg in CW #4-5, On the Texas Rangers
> > > (Avengers: The Initiative #2)
> > > Firebird - Anti-reg in CW #4-5, On the Texas Rangers (Avengers: The
> > > Initiative #2)
> > > Triathalon - Anti-reg in CW #4-5, At Camp Hammond (Avengers: The
> > > Initiative #1)
> > > Justice - Anti-reg in CW #5, At Camp Hammond (Avengers: The Initiative
> > > #1)
> > > Stingray - Anti-reg in CW #5, At Camp Hammond (Avengers: The
> > > Initiative #1)
> > > Nighthawk - switched sides in CW #4
> > > Stature - switched sides in CW #4
> > > Invisible Woman - Took amnesty
> > > Human Torch - Took amnesty
> > > Hulkling - At Camp Hammond (Avengers: The Initiative #2)
> > > the Falcon - Anti-reg in CW, registered (according to an article in
> > > Wizard)
> > > Are there more that are known? (FYI, I posted this here on the Marvel
> > > U board and the Avengers board)
> >
> > A few from Battle Damage Report:
> >
> > Arachne
> > BAD Girls, Inc. (Black Mamba, Asp, Diamondback)
> > Network
> > Phone Ranger
>
> Phone Ranger? Phone Ranger?? That's the lamest name ever!

Yeah, well, somebody's gotta think of the phones. They've suffered far too much abuse over the years.
____________________



Posted with Netscape Navigator 8.1.3 on Windows XP
Omar Karindu




Once an Anti-Reg hero has been captured, and has his or her or its name, powers, and limitations catalogued, aren't they de facto registered? They're not in compliance with the mandatory training part of the law, of course, but indefinite detention seems like a rather bizarre and unfair way to handle someone once you have the information from them that the SHRA requires.

Are we really meant to think that the legal penalty for refusing to register is life imprisonment with parole solely conditional on working for SHIELD? The arrestees we've seen seem to be treated as if they'd forfeited some sort of "one-shot-only" retirement option of the sort that Firestar used. Of course, the Initiaitive #1 strongly suggests that merely using super-powers, as opposed ot using them for vigilantism, is illegal. Cloud 9 wasn't fighting crime when she was conscripted, after all; she was just flying around. Surely the SHRA as explained by its defenders ought to be aimed at curtailing vigilantism specifically rather than the mere existence of superpowers?

- Omar Karindu

"A Renoir. I have three, myself. I had four, but ordered one burned...It
displeased me." -- Doctor Doom

"It's not, 'Oh, they killed Sue Dibney and I always loved that character,' it's 'Oh, they broke a story engine that could have told a thousand stories in order to publish a single 'important' one.'" -- John Seavey


Posted with Apple Safari on MacOS X
Icon




> Once an Anti-Reg hero has been captured, and has his or her or its name, powers, and limitations catalogued, aren't they de facto registered?

Only if they actually KNOW the person's name powers and can credibly believe that they know all their powers (The same way that Moonstone, in her Meteorite guise, never used her phasing power, even though it would have been convenient to do so, so people would be less likely to connect them. Similarly Mimic in one of the Exiles arc, displayed all his powers as a captive gladiator, except for his optic blasts, which he kept as an ace in the hole)

> Are we really meant to think that the legal penalty for refusing to register is life imprisonment with parole solely conditional on working for SHIELD? The arrestees we've seen seem to be treated as if they'd forfeited some sort of "one-shot-only" retirement option of the sort that Firestar used. Of course, the Initiaitive #1 strongly suggests that merely using super-powers, as opposed ot using them for vigilantism, is illegal. Cloud 9 wasn't fighting crime when she was conscripted, after all; she was just flying around. Surely the SHRA as explained by its defenders ought to be aimed at curtailing vigilantism specifically rather than the mere existence of superpowers?

Given that the Initiative #1 has a scene where Yellowjacket very pointedly stays silent when asked by one of the newest crowd of draftee's what happens if they FAIL in their training (Which is something a lot of people would be asked very volubly (including established heroes like Stingray)) I'd say they still don't know the rules they're playing (and writing) under.


Posted with Microsoft Internet Explorer 7 on Windows XP

Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2018 Powermad Software