X-Universe >> View Thread |
Author | |
emerick-man![]() Moderator Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008 Posts: 68,900 |
Subject: X-Men Red #1: THAT's why?! Posted Wed Feb 07, 2018 at 04:33:20 pm EST (Viewed 330 times) |
THAT's why they're called "RED"? For a forced last page gimmick pun? *SIGH!* ![]() And continuing from that with the rest of the PBP... Title Page: Not including Gentle and Trinary makes NO SENSE. It's like a diss, really. 08 UGH. Lazy flashback timestamping. How many months after Phoenix Resurrection? Why no mention of said mini? The art... questionable for the rest of the ish. They can detail some squiggly lines but can't even throw in some cool or creative actual street name? 09 Ugly baby - well, at least by anatomical comparison to Toby's look pages later. On the plus side, throwaway Booch gets named too. THE BABY'S A SCREEEAMER!!! 10 Seriously. THAT's a FULL page? Well, at least we can wonder how Toby compares to Syrin or Sean as we watch a car spin. 11 The WolverineS just HAPPEN to be there or Jean called them in before a crisis new mutant powers generate a crisis - similarly unclear as when the heroes show up in the preview pages scenario. Prooobably baby was detected early by Cerebro - so a little less confusing than the earlier 'Searebro' arrival? 12 Okay, THAT's got to be Syrin and Banshee equivalent showing. 13 Jean and Kurt show up for your random/standard first encounter with a new mutant scenario. Apparently they only need 2 (unless it's 4)... uhh, cuz it's only a baby? Okay, and if Jean gave a heads up call to Laura then she should've had 'em bring earplugs. 14 Impressive and sweet showing for Jean. 15 The X-men offer the mom reasonable stat solutions. 16 Lydia Nance was kind of interesting as the anti-mutant face and this Harold Nobody seems uninspired with his intro. What's worse, with all the solutions Jean TP'ed for Toby - why the heck did she not just wipe the memory of the baby from the few people that could have possibly seen her. Bah. Sooo, readers will have to deal with another book with another take on handling TP to suit the writer's tastes. Pet peeve randomness is sure to follow with the book lead being a telepath... 17 What do we think of Jean's showing here? She's pulling a Superman or high-end showing of DD as they can read the simultaneous minds across great distances on a whim. It's not even clear what or why she's doing it here. 18 Welcome use of global locales since Jean is trying to 'heal the world' of it's mutant problems. Neat BP inclusion. 19 The story gives us 2 missing months and now throws us right into the middle of her post-Resurrection and reborn-motivation. Seems a bit lazy to assume readers can presume why this is such a logical step in her unrevealed quest. Jean doesn't even know what to do next - or is she fishing for better ways to go about unsaid idea? Sooo, all these pro-mutant world laureate agreed to gather for a group mind meld to a known Omega Telepath or unknown one - either way is forced plot device rush?? 20-21 Greeeat. It's a BEAUTIFUL idea and plan - at least according to Kurt. She tells him but not readers! And not Kitty or X-mentors? 22-23 She's recruiting Atlantis more than just Namor. She needs a country behind her to turn wheels at the U.N. Hmm... Magneto failed at that and Xavier/Scott/Kitty didn't even try that route. Just saying. Plus, her trip underwater is a notable power showing. Empty Namor inclusion. 24-25 Addressing the U.N. It's been done before. But it's a bearable 2 pages and Jean neatly wins at her gambit of political meandering this ish. Oddly, she essentially threatens them all with mind manipulation to prove her point. Her big win? She basically just wants everyone to start liking mutants again. Hmmph. THAT's her big win? 26-28 EEP! Worst. Backfire. Ever. Her first attempt to make a mutant ally is to grossly blow up the -literal- head of a U.K. Ambassador in broad daylight! [Come to think of it Carnelia suffered a similar atrocity years ago with IM.] Now, the series starts... 29 THAT's why there's a team. To act as Jean's protector as she continues her untold Heal The World mission statement? 30. CRAP! The (sadly inevitable) Return of another despicable and disliked X-men arch-enemy: Cassandra! Which reminds me of another failing of this premiere - the chronological neglect to note the Return of Xavier over in Astonishing book. Well, at least the bland cover makes more sense as it was clearly all about selling Jean and her return to readers. Unfortunately, not buying it yet. What reactions did YOU have? ![]() Support Cancer Research and Alzheimer Research.
Posted with Mozilla 11.0 on Windows 7
| |
The Black Guardian ![]() ![]() Moderator Location: Paragon City, RI Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008 Posts: 26,720 |
Subject: Re: X-Men Red #1: THAT's why?! [Re: emerick-man] Posted Thu Feb 08, 2018 at 08:34:35 am EST (Viewed 212 times) |
Quote: THAT's why they're called "RED"? For a forced last page gimmick pun?Yikes! And now the team has to live up to that? So much for healing the world. So... it's going to be an ironic name? Quote: Title Page: Not including Gentle and Trinary makes NO SENSE. It's like a diss, really.Well, they sort of haven't joined the team yet because of that in medias res thingy. It is only those faces in the dramatis personae. Aaand... that's enough Latin for today. Quote: 08 UGH. Lazy flashback timestamping. How many months after Phoenix Resurrection? Why no mention of said mini? The art... questionable for the rest of the ish. They can detail some squiggly lines but can't even throw in some cool or creative actual street name? Agreed about the art. Quote: 10 Seriously. THAT's a FULL page? Well, at least we can wonder how Toby compares to Syrin or Sean as we watch a car spin.Not really a full page. Quote: 11 The WolverineS just HAPPEN to be there or Jean called them in before a crisis new mutant powers generate a crisis - similarly unclear as when the heroes show up in the preview pages scenario. Prooobably baby was detected early by Cerebro - so a little less confusing than the earlier 'Searebro' arrival?Yeah. Odd to make it Roosevelt Island. Why not the Bronx, where the girls live? Meh. Quote: 12 Okay, THAT's got to be Syrin and Banshee equivalent showing.Certainly... well, nobody's flying. Quote: 14 Impressive and sweet showing for Jean.15 The X-men offer the mom reasonable stat solutions. Agreed. Quote: 16 Lydia Nance was kind of interesting as the anti-mutant face and this Harold Nobody seems uninspired with his intro. What's worse, with all the solutions Jean TP'ed for Toby - why the heck did she not just wipe the memory of the baby from the few people that could have possibly seen her. Bah. Sooo, readers will have to deal with another book with another take on handling TP to suit the writer's tastes. Pet peeve randomness is sure to follow with the book lead being a telepath...Well, I'm glad she did no mindwiping. Quote: 17 What do we think of Jean's showing here? She's pulling a Superman or high-end showing of DD as they can read the simultaneous minds across great distances on a whim. It's not even clear what or why she's doing it here.Well, it's clear what she's doing, but yeah... Why there? She should be able to read all that hate from her comfy apartment. Quote: 18 Welcome use of global locales since Jean is trying to 'heal the world' of it's mutant problems. Neat BP inclusion. Yes. Quote: 19 The story gives us 2 missing months and now throws us right into the middle of her post-Resurrection and reborn-motivation. Seems a bit lazy to assume readers can presume why this is such a logical step in her unrevealed quest. Jean doesn't even know what to do next - or is she fishing for better ways to go about unsaid idea? Sooo, all these pro-mutant world laureate agreed to gather for a group mind meld to a known Omega Telepath or unknown one - either way is forced plot device rush?? It's establishing her quest. Quote: 20-21 Greeeat. It's a BEAUTIFUL idea and plan - at least according to Kurt. She tells him but not readers! And not Kitty or X-mentors?It's pretty clear what the plan is. Why's it going to work this time? Quote: 22-23 She's recruiting Atlantis more than just Namor. She needs a country behind her to turn wheels at the U.N. Hmm... Magneto failed at that and Xavier/Scott/Kitty didn't even try that route. Just saying. Plus, her trip underwater is a notable power showing. Empty Namor inclusion.It's... just so unworkable. Just like the UK ambassador says, mutants are not a nation. They're not even a singular social group. Quote: 26-28 EEP! Worst. Backfire. Ever. Her first attempt to make a mutant ally is to grossly blow up the -literal- head of a U.K. Ambassador in broad daylight! [Come to think of it Carnelia suffered a similar atrocity years ago with IM.] Now, the series starts...One step forward. Two steps back. Quote: 30. CRAP! The (sadly inevitable) Return of another despicable and disliked X-men arch-enemy: Cassandra! Which reminds me of another failing of this premiere - the chronological neglect to note the Return of Xavier over in Astonishing book. Well, at least the bland cover makes more sense as it was clearly all about selling Jean and her return to readers. Unfortunately, not buying it yet.Blech. Quote: What reactions did YOU have?Problems, but actually better than I suspected. City of Heroes is BACK!
Posted with Mozilla Firefox 58.0 on Windows 10
| |
America's Captain ![]() ![]() Maintainer Location: Bayville New Jersey Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008 Posts: 12,139 |
Subject: Re: X-Men Red #1: THAT's why?! [Re: emerick-man] Posted Thu Feb 08, 2018 at 06:15:09 pm EST (Viewed 241 times) |
Quote: THAT's why they're called "RED"? For a forced last page gimmick pun?No - or at least I don't think so. They're called "Red" because Jean has red hair. And remember when I said I got a Supergirl vibe from that page where Jean first arrives? That vibe continued for the whole issue. Weird as this may seem, this book (intentionally or not) is setting up Jean not only as the alpha female mutant but as the alpha female superhero. Even with a movie on the way, Carol Danvers just can't seem to seize that role. I bought the issue. Jean as Supergirl was just the hook I needed. Quote: Title Page: Not including Gentle and Trinary makes NO SENSE. It's like a diss, really.They don't appear in the rest of the issue because it's all flashbacks and apparently they weren't involved yet. Quote: 08 UGH. Lazy flashback timestamping. How many months after Phoenix Resurrection? Why no mention of said mini?Because that mini was meaningless and stupid? But of course, I didn't read it, so what do I know? Quote: The art... questionable for the rest of the ish.It's questionable, period. But I like the red and blue of Jean's costume. It's always striking whenever she appears. In fact, every panel that has Jean in it is beautiful, no matter what she's wearing. These artists portray red hair as a transcendent aura of awesomeness. Quote: They can detail some squiggly lines but can't even throw in some cool or creative actual street name? You actually looked for a street name? I love you, man. Quote: 09 Ugly baby - well, at least by anatomical comparison to Toby's look pages later. On the plus side, throwaway Booch gets named too. THE BABY'S A SCREEEAMER!!!Quote: 10 Seriously. THAT's a FULL page? Well, at least we can wonder how Toby compares to Syrin or Sean as we watch a car spin.Quote: 11 The WolverineS just HAPPEN to be there or Jean called them in before a crisis new mutant powers generate a crisis - similarly unclear as when the heroes show up in the preview pages scenario. Prooobably baby was detected early by Cerebro - so a little less confusing than the earlier 'Searebro' arrival?Apparently Laura lives nearby. Jean actually tells the mother this, which caught me off guard from a secret identity point of view. So this makes two incidents in one issue of Jean and the Snikts saving young mutants like the 1963 mutants used to do. These are the real X-Men. All others are posers. (Well, OK, I'm overstating things by a lot, but seriously, this is the book that feels like the successor to 1963 and 1975. This is the X-Men being X-Men.) Quote: 12 Okay, THAT's got to be Syrin and Banshee equivalent showing.Quote: 13 Jean and Kurt show up for your random/standard first encounter with a new mutant scenario. Apparently they only need 2 (unless it's 4)... uhh, cuz it's only a baby? Okay, and if Jean gave a heads up call to Laura then she should've had 'em bring earplugs.Quote: 14 Impressive and sweet showing for Jean.Supergirl. Quote: 15 The X-men offer the mom reasonable stat solutions. 1963 style. Quote: 16 Lydia Nance was kind of interesting as the anti-mutant face and this Harold Nobody seems uninspired with his intro. What's worse, with all the solutions Jean TP'ed for Toby - why the heck did she not just wipe the memory of the baby from the few people that could have possibly seen her. Bah.Good point. Unethical? Quote: Sooo, readers will have to deal with another book with another take on handling TP to suit the writer's tastes. Pet peeve randomness is sure to follow with the book lead being a telepath...Quote: 17 What do we think of Jean's showing here? She's pulling a Superman or high-end showing of DD as they can read the simultaneous minds across great distances on a whim. It's not even clear what or why she's doing it here.Supergirl. 1963. 1975. Alpha female mutant. Alpha female superhero. Quote: 18 Welcome use of global locales since Jean is trying to 'heal the world' of it's mutant problems. Neat BP inclusion. Quote: 19 The story gives us 2 missing months and now throws us right into the middle of her post-Resurrection and reborn-motivation. Seems a bit lazy to assume readers can presume why this is such a logical step in her unrevealed quest. Jean doesn't even know what to do next - or is she fishing for better ways to go about unsaid idea? Sooo, all these pro-mutant world laureate agreed to gather for a group mind meld to a known Omega Telepath or unknown one - either way is forced plot device rush?? Here we've moved beyond Supergirl into Messiah territory. This is the sort of thing Wonder Woman probably dreams of doing. Jean is acting out Diana's highest aspirations. And she's doing it with Martian Manhunter's signature ability. Jean has absorbed the DC Universe into herself and transcended it. This could be a Watchmen story. Jean could be Doctor Manhattan. Quote: 20-21 Greeeat. It's a BEAUTIFUL idea and plan - at least according to Kurt. She tells him but not readers! And not Kitty or X-mentors?It's fascinating how she formulated the idea. She linked the greatest minds on Earth into a super-mind and used it to super-compute a plan she couldn't have conceived (probably no one could have conceived) independently. We've never seen this before. This is Messiah-level. So of course Kurt is the first one told - Kurt, who once was studying for the priesthood - Kurt, who knows what it means to serve a Messiah and has longed to do so. The soul of the X-Men. Kitty? I love Kitty but this is above Kitty's pay grade. I'm not sure who the other X-mentors are. Whoever they are, Jean will do this whether they agree with it or not. I get the impression that only Kurt's opinion really mattered. That fascinates me. He has knelt at the altar of a Messiah as a postulant. To him, before and above all others, to him Jean came with her idea. And he blessed it and asked to be baptised with it. Quote: 22-23 She's recruiting Atlantis more than just Namor. She needs a country behind her to turn wheels at the U.N.Wakanda also. But T'Challa is not a mutant so we likely won't be seeing much more of him. Namor, however, is a mutant, and now we know what he's doing in the book. I would never in a million years have guessed. Quote: Hmm... Magneto failed at that and Xavier/Scott/Kitty didn't even try that route. Just saying. Plus, her trip underwater is a notable power showing. Empty Namor inclusion.Why is it empty? She and Namor needed to talk. They talked. Quote: 24-25 Addressing the U.N. It's been done before. But it's a bearable 2 pages and Jean neatly wins at her gambit of political meandering this ish. Oddly, she essentially threatens them all with mind manipulation to prove her point. Her big win? She basically just wants everyone to start liking mutants again. Hmmph. THAT's her big win?No. Her big win was getting mutantkind recognized as a nation. If not for Cassandra Nova, Jean would have a seat at the UN representing the Mutant Nation. In fact she may still have that seat. Probably not but we didn't actually see the vote rescinded. After all, if I'm not mistaken, Doctor Doom has a seat at the UN. Quote: 26-28 EEP! Worst. Backfire. Ever. Her first attempt to make a mutant ally is to grossly blow up the -literal- head of a U.K. Ambassador in broad daylight! [Come to think of it Carnelia suffered a similar atrocity years ago with IM.] Now, the series starts...Cassandra Nova is apparently the Big Bad. And let's face it, she's pretty big and pretty bad. Quote: 29 THAT's why there's a team. To act as Jean's protector as she continues her untold Heal The World mission statement?I'm not sure they're her protectors. She probably protects them more than they protect her. They're more like her disciples. Her Apostles. Quote: 30. CRAP! The (sadly inevitable) Return of another despicable and disliked X-men arch-enemy: Cassandra! Which reminds me of another failing of this premiere - the chronological neglect to note the Return of Xavier over in Astonishing book. Well, at least the bland cover makes more sense as it was clearly all about selling Jean and her return to readers. Unfortunately, not buying it yet.I know you and Black Guardian think Astonishing matters but I'm not convinced. We'll see if Xavier is still at large when the story arc ends. Right now it is my opinion that X-Men: Red is the premiere X-book.
Posted with Google Chrome 63.0.3239.132 on Windows 10
| |
Comicguy1![]() Member Since: Tue Apr 04, 2017 Posts: 1,511 |
Subject: Re: Is She Really That Disliked? [Re: emerick-man] Posted Thu Feb 08, 2018 at 08:31:17 pm EST (Viewed 223 times) |
Cassandra Nova, I mean. She was good during the Grant Morrison run, and that part of his run is classic. E Is For Extinction is, anyhow. She's about as powerful as Jean, isn't she?
Posted with Google Chrome 48.0.2564.116 on Windows 10
| |
emerick-man![]() |
Subject: Re: Not a Kara in the X-world... [Re: America's Captain] Posted Thu Feb 08, 2018 at 09:15:05 pm EST (Viewed 19 times) |
First off the very entertaining Supergirl TV series was taken off my cable TV package shortly after the first season. ![]() ![]() Quote: No - or at least I don't think so. They're called "Red" because Jean has red hair. Heh. Quote: And remember when I said I got a Supergirl vibe from that page where Jean first arrives? That vibe continued for the whole issue. Weird as this may seem, this book (intentionally or not) is setting up Jean not only as the alpha female mutant but as the alpha female superhero. Even with a movie on the way, Carol Danvers just can't seem to seize that role.I bought the issue. Jean as Supergirl was just the hook I needed. ![]() Quote: They don't appear in the rest of the issue because it's all flashbacks and apparently they weren't involved yet. Fair enough. Still it worth a nitpick, imo. It's the team premiere - show the team. And "effectively" they DO appear in the book. Also, Marvel sometimes use the headshots page as cast credits indicator who appears, like this ish, but sometimes as a roll call page - just like Avengers No Surrender issue out this week, too. Quote: Because [Phoenix Resurrection?] mini was meaningless and stupid? But of course, I didn't read it, so what do I know? Well, it was the where/when/why/where/how Jean came back to life which means something. The "2 MONTH GAP" is only about 25% as annoying as the 8 MONTH GAP after Secret Wars but it's still lazy exposition of her assimilation and reactions of everybody else that followed. Quote: It's questionable, period. But I like the red and blue of Jean's costume. It's always striking whenever she appears. In fact, every panel that has Jean in it is beautiful, no matter what she's wearing. These artists portray red hair as a transcendent aura of awesomeness. No real complaints with her costume. Quote: Apparently Laura lives nearby. Jean actually tells the mother this, which caught me off guard from a secret identity point of view. Well, the mutants and their 'public' school are on display in Central Park so secret identities are probably not priority anymore. Still, it was an odd gesture in light of general personal privacy. The whole public display angle seems underplayed and should be as key to the characters as when IM, DD, Spidey, etc. have been outed in the past. Sentinel Programs, Stevil's HYDRA America, evil anti-mutant groups, etc. probably have reams of census data on mutant aliases by now. Is Wolverinelaura living under her real name? Are X-men codenames a waste of time or just a means for deniability now? So many aspects of mutant acceptance can be inferred by Jean's gester here. Quote: So this makes two incidents in one issue of Jean and the Snikts saving young mutants like the 1963 mutants used to do. These are the real X-Men. All others are posers. (Well, OK, I'm overstating things by a lot, but seriously, this is the book that feels like the successor to 1963 and 1975. This is the X-Men being X-Men.) Quote: Supergirl. ![]() Quote: Good point. Unethical? Absolutely unethical. But debatabley still a thing an X-man might do. A smart thing to do? Lesser of 2 evils (from the X-men POB)? X-Telepaths have done mega-worse mind tweaking by comparison. Toby has just been marked for life - and Jean's new 'tude has her okay with that? So, no big deal to her if every global supervillain knows where to find any Omega Level living at the Mansion? Quote: Supergirl. 1963. 1975. Alpha female mutant. Alpha female superhero. ![]() Quote: Here we've moved beyond Supergirl into Messiah territory. This is the sort of thing Wonder Woman probably dreams of doing. Jean is acting out Diana's highest aspirations. And she's doing it with Martian Manhunter's signature ability. Jean has absorbed the DC Universe into herself and transcended it. This could be a Watchmen story. Jean could be Doctor Manhattan Your parallel impressions to the DCU... abound. ![]() Quote: It's fascinating how she formulated the idea. She linked the greatest minds on Earth into a super-mind and used it to super-compute a plan she couldn't have conceived (probably no one could have conceived) independently. We've never seen this before. THAT'S the plan? A Uni-Mind Wannabe course of action (unrevealed) but laid out in detail (to only Jean and Kurt and the brainiacs) so far? The story presentation of it just feels... wanting. And the logic of it - uhhh - why not come up with a plan for World Peace if it was that easy to collaborate an easy todo list? Hmm... Quote: This is Messiah-level. OMG. Really?! Quote: So of course Kurt is the first one told - Kurt, who once was studying for the priesthood - Kurt, who knows what it means to serve a Messiah and has longed to do so. The soul of the X-Men. It will be interesting if they ever compare notes about being reborn. They probably should; it will be a challenge for a writer to make such a story entertaining - not to mention relatable. Quote: Kitty? I love Kitty but this is above Kitty's pay grade. I'm not sure who the other X-mentors are. Whoever they are, Jean will do this whether they agree with it or not. I get the impression that only Kurt's opinion really mattered. That fascinates me. He has knelt at the altar of a Messiah as a postulant. To him, before and above all others, to him Jean came with her idea. And he blessed it and asked to be baptised with it. Hate the lack of clear dynamic between Jean and her so-called long lost X-family. Quote: Why is it empty? She and Namor needed to talk. They talked. All we get is the gist. Jean wants him on his team and his country behind her and she got it. No motivation like we get with T'Challa. No reason for him to rejoin the X-men - or indication that he already was a member in the past. No Atlantean Nation status or Secret Wars followup. Empty, imo. Quote: No. Her big win was getting mutantkind recognized as a nation. If not for Cassandra Nova, Jean would have a seat at the UN representing the Mutant Nation. In fact she may still have that seat. Probably not but we didn't actually see the vote rescinded. After all, if I'm not mistaken, Doctor Doom has a seat at the UN. Did you take Mutant Nation as a people and not a land? Can the U.N. admit a race instead of a country? Latervia may or may not still be a member but certainly fugitive Iron-Dr.Doom-Man doesn't/shouldn't have one ATM. Quote: Cassandra Nova is apparently the Big Bad. And let's face it, she's pretty big and pretty bad. No argument. Boo. Literally, figuratively and creatively a bad character. Bah. The female legacy version of Farouk - who we just got. Let's see if they do something different and creative with her... Quote: I'm not sure they're her protectors. She probably protects them more than they protect her. They're more like her disciples. Her Apostles. OMG. Really?! Quote: I know you and Black Guardian think Astonishing matters but I'm not convinced. We'll see if Xavier is still at large when the story arc ends. Right now it is my opinion that X-Men: Red is the premiere X-book. ![]() I miss Dad & Dan.
Posted with Mozilla 11.0 on Windows 7
| |
America's Captain ![]() ![]() Maintainer Location: Bayville New Jersey Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008 Posts: 12,139 |
Subject: Re: Not a Kara in the X-world... [Re: emerick-man] Posted Thu Feb 08, 2018 at 10:01:02 pm EST (Viewed 189 times) |
Quote: First off the very entertaining Supergirl TV series was taken off my cable TV package shortly after the first season. ![]() ![]() I don't read it. I haven't cared about the in-print Supergirl since Crisis on Infinite Earths obliterated the Silver/Bronze Age real McCoy, whom I loved for decades. I watched the TV show for a season or two with my younger daughter. It was pretty good, I thought. Quote: Quote: They don't appear in the rest of the issue because it's all flashbacks and apparently they weren't involved yet. Fair enough. Still it worth a nitpick, imo. It's the team premiere - show the team. And "effectively" they DO appear in the book. Also, Marvel sometimes use the headshots page as cast credits indicator who appears, like this ish, but sometimes as a roll call page - just like Avengers No Surrender issue out this week, too. True. I probably have less interest because I don't know the characters. I could actually wish they weren't in the book, although I don't know who I'd replace them with. I don't want any other 1963 X-Men, nor do I want any other 1975 X-Men, because I don't want the book to feel dated, so - I guess Gentle and Trinary are as good as anybody, since they're both 21st century characters. It's cool that Gentle is Wakandan. Quote: Quote: Because [Phoenix Resurrection] was meaningless and stupid? But of course, I didn't read it, so what do I know? Well, it was the where/when/why/where/how Jean came back to life which means something. She's back to life because the Phoenix resurrected her, because that's what the Phoenix does, apparently. The entire story arc could be summarized as follows: PHOENIX: Be alive again, Jean. Be happy. I love you. JEAN: Ugh. Not again. But I have no choice in the matter so OK. Not one iota of a rationale as to what Jean will do with herself. To me that's meaningless. Quote: Quote: Apparently Laura lives nearby. Jean actually tells the mother this, which caught me off guard from a secret identity point of view. Well, the mutants and their 'public' school are on display in Central Park so secret identities are probably not priority anymore. Still, it was an odd gesture in light of general personal privacy. The whole public display angle seems underplayed and should be as key to the characters as when IM, DD, Spidey, etc. have been outed in the past. Sentinel Programs, Stevil's HYDRA America, evil anti-mutant groups, etc. probably have reams of census data on mutant aliases by now. Is Wolverinelaura living under her real name? Are X-men codenames a waste of time or just a means for deniability now? So many aspects of mutant acceptance can be inferred by Jean's gesture here. Laura has a secret identity because she has mundane loved ones she wants to protect. One would think the other X-Men have mundane loved ones too, but you'd never know it, as they never interact with any of them. Quote: THAT'S the plan? A Uni-Mind Wannabe course of action (unrevealed) but laid out in detail (to only Jean and Kurt and the brainiacs) so far? The story presentation of it just feels... wanting. And the logic of it - uhhh - why not come up with a plan for World Peace if it was that easy to collaborate an easy to do list?It was only easy for Jean, Omega level super-mutant. Quote: Quote: This is Messiah-level. OMG. Really?! The religious analogue doesn't jump out at you? Quote: Hate the lack of clear dynamic between Jean and her so-called long lost X-family.Are you talking about the 1963 and 1975 teams? I'm sure we'll get to that. We've seen Kurt so far. Probably next up will be Warren, as I figure his money will prove useful - except I have no idea of the current state of Angel/Archangel. That convoluted story got way out of hand. Quote: Did you take Mutant Nation as a people and not a land?Yes. They say as much in the comic. Quote: Can the U.N. admit a race instead of a country?Apparently, since they did it in this issue of the comic. Quote: Latervia may or may not still be a member but certainly fugitive Iron-Dr.Doom-Man doesn't/shouldn't have one ATM.Oh. Right. Another story that's gotten way out of hand.
Posted with Google Chrome 63.0.3239.132 on Windows 10
| |
emerick-man![]() Moderator Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008 Posts: 68,900 |
Subject: Re: Not a Kara in the X-world... [Re: America's Captain] Posted Thu Feb 08, 2018 at 11:32:08 pm EST (Viewed 213 times) |
Quote: True. I probably have less interest because I don't know the characters. I could actually wish they weren't in the book, although I don't know who I'd replace them with. I don't want any other 1963 X-Men, nor do I want any other 1975 X-Men, because I don't want the book to feel dated, so - I guess Gentle and Trinary are as good as anybody, since they're both 21st century characters. It's cool that Gentle is Wakandan. Yeah. It's fine that 1 rep is from 1963 and 1 from 1975. It all depends how the writer presents the other 5. Having duplicate wolverine powersets COULD be a problem creatively and it will be a challenge to match the entertaining dynamic and shared universe pace of their successful ANW book. Namor will be a big fish to land. ![]() Quote: She's back to life because the Phoenix resurrected her, because that's what the Phoenix does, apparently. The entire story arc could be summarized as follows:PHOENIX: Be alive again, Jean. Be happy. I love you. JEAN: Ugh. Not again. But I have no choice in the matter so OK. Not one iota of a rationale as to what Jean will do with herself. To me that's meaningless. Yeah, it was a terrible mini. That's why it was a lazy 2 MONTH GAP timestamp to write in. It was a missed opp -no, a necessity- to fix some of the fallout from that 'meaningless' event that brought Jean back, imo. Quote: Laura has a secret identity because she has mundane loved ones she wants to protect. One would think the other X-Men have mundane loved ones too, but you'd never know it, as they never interact with any of them. Quote: It was only easy for Jean, Omega level super-mutant. But she can't generate ideas from each of the brainiac trust, can she? Or stimulate their thinking potential, can she? Hmm... wonder how long that mind-meld session went on for? Quote: The religious analogue doesn't jump out at you? That's actually a tough question. Especially with another new conceived X-Telepathic specification involved. The actual feat she performed sorta didn't totally register, at least the way the story read (on my fisrt read thru). It didn't seem Messiah-Level. Could be wrong. Are you saying better than Omega Level? Showings, w/o description details, are probably a subjective thing. Seeing any impressive superpower in action could be a transcendant experience. Quote: Are you talking about the 1963 and 1975 teams? I'm sure we'll get to that. We've seen Kurt so far. Probably next up will be Warren, as I figure his money will prove useful - except I have no idea of the current state of Angel/Archangel. That convoluted story got way out of hand. Quote: Quote:Did you take Mutant Nation as a people and not a land? Yes. They say as much in the comic. Quote:Can the U.N. admit a race instead of a country? Apparently, since they did it in this issue of the comic. K. Thx. Quote: Quote: Latervia may or may not still be a member but certainly fugitive Iron-Dr.Doom-Man doesn't/shouldn't have one ATM. Oh. Right. Another story that's gotten way out of hand. Yup. ![]() Support Cancer Research and Alzheimer Research.
Posted with Mozilla 11.0 on Windows 7
| |
The Black Guardian ![]() ![]() Moderator Location: Paragon City, RI Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008 Posts: 26,720 |
Subject: Re: X-Men Red #1: THAT's why?! [Re: America's Captain] Posted Fri Feb 09, 2018 at 08:37:25 am EST (Viewed 192 times) |
Quote: Quote: 09 Ugly baby - well, at least by anatomical comparison to Toby's look pages later. On the plus side, throwaway Booch gets named too. THE BABY'S A SCREEEAMER!!!Quote: Quote: 10 Seriously. THAT's a FULL page? Well, at least we can wonder how Toby compares to Syrin or Sean as we watch a car spin.Quote: Quote: 11 The WolverineS just HAPPEN to be there or Jean called them in before a crisis new mutant powers generate a crisis - similarly unclear as when the heroes show up in the preview pages scenario. Prooobably baby was detected early by Cerebro - so a little less confusing than the earlier 'Searebro' arrival?Quote: Apparently Laura lives nearby. Jean actually tells the mother this, which caught me off guard from a secret identity point of view.That's sort of a problem. We know where Laura's apartment is. It's in The Bronx. We've even been given the address (the map below is the approximate address). Roosevelt Island isn't really "in the neighbourhood." Google Map But yeah. Nitpicky. But it's like someone saying Cap is from Long Island. ![]() Quote: So this makes two incidents in one issue of Jean and the Snikts saving young mutants like the 1963 mutants used to do. These are the real X-Men. All others are posers. (Well, OK, I'm overstating things by a lot, but seriously, this is the book that feels like the successor to 1963 and 1975. This is the X-Men being X-Men.)Saving young mutants wasn't really what X-Men did in 1963, aside from Xavier forming the team. They were always saving humanity from mutants. You know, "protecting the world that fears us." And again, aside from the team-building, the X-Men didn't do this in 1975 either. Again, the X-Men were primarily about defending humanity from the threat of mutants. The only young mutant that was saved like this was Nightcrawler. Quote: Quote: 15 The X-men offer the mom reasonable stat solutions. Quote: 1963 style.No. Quote: Quote: 18 Welcome use of global locales since Jean is trying to 'heal the world' of it's mutant problems. Neat BP inclusion. Quote: Quote: 20-21 Greeeat. It's a BEAUTIFUL idea and plan - at least according to Kurt. She tells him but not readers! And not Kitty or X-mentors?Quote: It's fascinating how she formulated the idea. She linked the greatest minds on Earth into a super-mind and used it to super-compute a plan she couldn't have conceived (probably no one could have conceived) independently. We've never seen this before. This is Messiah-level. So of course Kurt is the first one told - Kurt, who once was studying for the priesthood - Kurt, who knows what it means to serve a Messiah and has longed to do so. The soul of the X-Men. Even if I believed we could think ourselves to paradise (and I don't), we don't get to see the reasoning Jean was doing after this. Quote: Kitty? I love Kitty but this is above Kitty's pay grade. I'm not sure who the other X-mentors are. Whoever they are, Jean will do this whether they agree with it or not. I get the impression that only Kurt's opinion really mattered. That fascinates me. He has knelt at the altar of a Messiah as a postulant. To him, before and above all others, to him Jean came with her idea. And he blessed it and asked to be baptised with it.Not Storm?! She's supposed to be Jean's BFF, and she's just as religious. I love Nightcrawler. He's one of my X-trinity, but he's not a great inquisitive mind that's going to be a good sounding board for any ideas. If I were thinking about building something potentially great, he'd be one of the last people I'd ask for opinions. Quote: Quote: 22-23 She's recruiting Atlantis more than just Namor. She needs a country behind her to turn wheels at the U.N.Quote: Wakanda also. But T'Challa is not a mutant so we likely won't be seeing much more of him. Namor, however, is a mutant, and now we know what he's doing in the book. I would never in a million years have guessed.Yeah, plus he seems to be providing the HQ (Sea-rebro). Quote: Quote: 24-25 Addressing the U.N. It's been done before. But it's a bearable 2 pages and Jean neatly wins at her gambit of political meandering this ish. Oddly, she essentially threatens them all with mind manipulation to prove her point. Her big win? She basically just wants everyone to start liking mutants again. Hmmph. THAT's her big win?Quote: No. Her big win was getting mutantkind recognized as a nation. If not for Cassandra Nova, Jean would have a seat at the UN representing the Mutant Nation. In fact she may still have that seat. Probably not but we didn't actually see the vote rescinded. After all, if I'm not mistaken, Doctor Doom has a seat at the UN.That battle hasn't even been won yet, and doesn't seem likely to at the end of this. By the ending of this issue, mutants were still NOT recognized as a nation. Jean was trying to get the UK vote to help with this when the head exploded. Quote: Quote: 26-28 EEP! Worst. Backfire. Ever. Her first attempt to make a mutant ally is to grossly blow up the -literal- head of a U.K. Ambassador in broad daylight! [Come to think of it Carnelia suffered a similar atrocity years ago with IM.] Now, the series starts...Quote: Cassandra Nova is apparently the Big Bad. And let's face it, she's pretty big and pretty bad. Yeah. I may hate her, but she is that. Quote: Quote: 29 THAT's why there's a team. To act as Jean's protector as she continues her untold Heal The World mission statement?Quote: I'm not sure they're her protectors. She probably protects them more than they protect her. They're more like her disciples. Her Apostles.They don't seem to be. Quote: Quote: 30. CRAP! The (sadly inevitable) Return of another despicable and disliked X-men arch-enemy: Cassandra! Which reminds me of another failing of this premiere - the chronological neglect to note the Return of Xavier over in Astonishing book. Well, at least the bland cover makes more sense as it was clearly all about selling Jean and her return to readers. Unfortunately, not buying it yet.Quote: I know you and Black Guardian think Astonishing matters but I'm not convinced. We'll see if Xavier is still at large when the story arc ends. Right now it is my opinion that X-Men: Red is the premiere X-book. This is a good point. We don't know the plans for Astonishing after #12. The series was supposed to be building up to #12. It's very possible the series ends then. However, my main problem with Red is this whole idea of a mutant homeland or place. It's a horrible, quite idiotic idea, and it runs completely counter to Xavier's vision or the X-Men's purpose in 1963, 1975, or any time pre-2000. If this is what Jean's working towards, then please end this thing now. City of Heroes is BACK!
Posted with Mozilla Firefox 58.0 on Windows 10
| |
America's Captain ![]() ![]() Maintainer Location: Bayville New Jersey Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008 Posts: 12,139 |
Subject: Re: X-Men Red #1: THAT's why?! [Re: The Black Guardian] Posted Fri Feb 09, 2018 at 08:55:19 am EST (Viewed 163 times) |
Quote: Saving young mutants wasn't really what X-Men did in 1963, aside from Xavier forming the team. They were always saving humanity from mutants. You know, "protecting the world that fears us."I could swear I've read dozens of stories about the X-Men saving young mutants. Did they all happen in the 21st century? Was it a Morrison thing? Was it a 90s thing? An 80s thing? Quote: Not Storm?! She's supposed to be Jean's BFF, and she's just as religious.She is? What religion does she practice? Quote: I love Nightcrawler. He's one of my X-trinity, but he's not a great inquisitive mind that's going to be a good sounding board for any ideas. If I were thinking about building something potentially great, he'd be one of the last people I'd ask for opinions.Unless what you wanted was a spiritual answer. Quote: Yeah, plus he (Namor) seems to be providing the HQ (Sea-rebro).I can't wait to learn more about that! Quote: That battle hasn't even been won yet, and doesn't seem likely to at the end of this. By the ending of this issue, mutants were still NOT recognized as a nation. Jean was trying to get the UK vote to help with this when the head exploded.I thought they voted. They seemed pretty happy coming out of the building. Going back and re-reading, I definitely get the impression the vote happened and went Jean's way. LAURA: I'm glad we came to watch. That was impressive. HONEY BADGER: Your first step publicly stomped a whole lot of intolerant nations. But I can see I'm much more willing to read between the lines than you and Emerick Man are. This creative team definitely needs to do better as far as providing concrete answers as to what just happened in the prior panels. Quote: However, my main problem with Red is this whole idea of a mutant homeland or place. It's a horrible, quite idiotic idea, and it runs completely counter to Xavier's vision or the X-Men's purpose in 1963, 1975, or any time pre-2000. If this is what Jean's working towards, then please end this thing now.Jean doesn't want a homeland. She flat out said this. JEAN: And every time mutants have come together to live in one place - Genosha, Utopia - we have simply made ourselves a bigger target. Whenever mutantkind has tried to live alone, apart, we have been slaughtered. She doesn't want a homeland. She wants to be recognized at the UN as a people. A people who are in diaspora around the world.
Posted with Google Chrome 63.0.3239.132 on Windows 10
| |
Menshevik![]() Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008 Posts: 4,617 |
Subject: Re: X-Men Red #1: THAT's why?! [Re: America's Captain] Posted Fri Feb 09, 2018 at 09:50:36 am EST (Viewed 194 times) |
Quote: Quote: THAT's why they're called "RED"? For a forced last page gimmick pun?Quote: No - or at least I don't think so. They're called "Red" because Jean has red hair.Quote: And remember when I said I got a Supergirl vibe from that page where Jean first arrives? That vibe continued for the whole issue. Weird as this may seem, this book (intentionally or not) is setting up Jean not only as the alpha female mutant but as the alpha female superhero. Even with a movie on the way, Carol Danvers just can't seem to seize that role.Well, let's see how that turns out. Being the alpha character is not just about having huge and/or kewl powers or being invincible (otherwise Squirrel Girl would be Marvel's clear alpha female ![]() Oh, and by the way: IMO Supergirl is AT BEST the beta female of the DC Universe (although e.g. Barbara Gordon might actually have a better claim to that position). Wonder Woman is the alpha and really has been without interruption since the 1940s...
Posted with Mozilla Firefox 58.0 on Windows 10
| |
The Black Guardian ![]() ![]() Moderator Location: Paragon City, RI Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008 Posts: 26,720 |
Subject: Re: X-Men Red #1: THAT's why?! [Re: America's Captain] Posted Fri Feb 09, 2018 at 11:51:37 am EST (Viewed 186 times) |
Quote: Quote: Saving young mutants wasn't really what X-Men did in 1963, aside from Xavier forming the team. They were always saving humanity from mutants. You know, "protecting the world that fears us."Quote: I could swear I've read dozens of stories about the X-Men saving young mutants. Did they all happen in the 21st century? Was it a Morrison thing? Was it a 90s thing? An 80s thing?Most of this sort of hysteria came later, in the 80s and afterwards. Plus, there really weren't many mutants around back in the 60s and 70s. Quote: Quote: Not Storm?! She's supposed to be Jean's BFF, and she's just as religious.Quote: She is? What religion does she practice?She's pagan. Her catchphrase is, "By the Goddess!" Or "Bright Lady!" Quote: Quote: I love Nightcrawler. He's one of my X-trinity, but he's not a great inquisitive mind that's going to be a good sounding board for any ideas. If I were thinking about building something potentially great, he'd be one of the last people I'd ask for opinions.Quote: Unless what you wanted was a spiritual answer.Even then, and that's certainly not what Jean's looking for. Heck, Nightcrawler's never even been able to answer his own spiritual questions. This is a guy who was ignorant enough to believe he'd become a priest of a religion he's supposedly known most of his life, but followed none of the steps to become a priest. Quote: Quote: However, my main problem with Red is this whole idea of a mutant homeland or place. It's a horrible, quite idiotic idea, and it runs completely counter to Xavier's vision or the X-Men's purpose in 1963, 1975, or any time pre-2000. If this is what Jean's working towards, then please end this thing now.Quote: Jean doesn't want a homeland. She flat out said this. Quote: JEAN: And every time mutants have come together to live in one place - Genosha, Utopia - we have simply made ourselves a bigger target. Whenever mutantkind has tried to live alone, apart, we have been slaughtered.Quote: She doesn't want a homeland. She wants to be recognized at the UN as a people. A people who are in diaspora around the world.Then I completely misinterpreted the mountaintop scene. I thought she was showing Nightcrawler the plot of land she wanted to start with. At this point, I see absolutely no reason behind that entire scene. And her mission seems to be more one of evil than good. You cannot be a nation without a plot of land. Period. That is what the UN deals with. Involving them in this is absurd, and frankly, this plan seeks to undermine every government in the world, including T'Challa's and Namor's (I don't see them going for this). This is exactly the sort of thing Xavier fought against. City of Heroes is BACK!
Posted with Mozilla Firefox 58.0 on Windows 10
| |
Menshevik![]() Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008 Posts: 4,617 |
Subject: Re: X-Men Red #1: THAT's why?! [Re: The Black Guardian] Posted Fri Feb 09, 2018 at 02:35:53 pm EST (Viewed 200 times) |
Quote: Quote: Quote: Saving young mutants wasn't really what X-Men did in 1963, aside from Xavier forming the team. They were always saving humanity from mutants. You know, "protecting the world that fears us."Most of this sort of hysteria came later, in the 80s and afterwards. Plus, there really weren't many mutants around back in the 60s and 70s. For someone only used to modern-day X-books it really must be surprising how few mutants were violently attacked by non-mutants for being mutants. In most cases the mobs didn't care whether the guys they wanted to lynch were mutants, altered humans or whatever, indeed in not a few cases (Scarlet Witch, Nightcrawler, Wolfsbane) they thought they were dealing with witches and demons. Most of the time when the X-Men were rushing to find a neophyte mutant it was to recruit them themselves and/or prevent the bad mutants (BOEM, Hellfire Club) from recruiting them. It almost seems to me that the trope of rescuing mutants from mutiphobe non-mutants only became a "big" thing with X-Factor (ironically when the O5 were secretly fueling mutiphobia themselves). Quote: Quote: Quote: However, my main problem with Red is this whole idea of a mutant homeland or place. It's a horrible, quite idiotic idea, and it runs completely counter to Xavier's vision or the X-Men's purpose in 1963, 1975, or any time pre-2000. If this is what Jean's working towards, then please end this thing now.Jean doesn't want a homeland. She flat out said this. JEAN: And every time mutants have come together to live in one place - Genosha, Utopia - we have simply made ourselves a bigger target. Whenever mutantkind has tried to live alone, apart, we have been slaughtered. She doesn't want a homeland. She wants to be recognized at the UN as a people. A people who are in diaspora around the world. Then I completely misinterpreted the mountaintop scene. I thought she was showing Nightcrawler the plot of land she wanted to start with. At this point, I see absolutely no reason behind that entire scene. And her mission seems to be more one of evil than good. You cannot be a nation without a plot of land. Period. That is what the UN deals with. Involving them in this is absurd, and frankly, this plan seeks to undermine every government in the world, including T'Challa's and Namor's (I don't see them going for this). This is exactly the sort of thing Xavier fought against. Indeed.
Posted with Mozilla Firefox 58.0 on Windows 10
| |
America's Captain ![]() ![]() Maintainer Location: Bayville New Jersey Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008 Posts: 12,139 |
Subject: Re: X-Men Red #1: THAT's why?! [Re: The Black Guardian] Posted Fri Feb 09, 2018 at 07:12:16 pm EST (Viewed 164 times) |
Quote: Most of this sort of hysteria came later, in the 80s and afterwards. Plus, there really weren't many mutants around back in the 60s and 70sFunny how I seem to be an 80s guy when it comes to mutants. I was 19 in 1980. The X-Men had Cerebro from the earliest days (1964) but according to Wikipedia they originally used it mainly to locate evil mutants, which goes along with what you were saying about what the X-Men mostly were about back then: fighting evil mutants. Nevertheless, the Sentinels first appeared in 1965, so "mutant hysteria" dates back to at least then, unless Bolivar Trask was an anomaly. Quote: Quote: Unless what you wanted was a spiritual answer.Even then, and that's certainly not what Jean's looking for. It's interesting how obvious the religious angle is to me. Here's something: Jean was raised from the dead. Sure, I know, this is Marvel, no big deal - unless the writer chooses to make it one. It is my contention that this writer is telling a metaphorical Gospel story, much as Roy Thomas did with his original take on Adam Warlock. Only in this story, the Messiah rises at the beginning of the tale instead of at the end. I predict some sort of Crucifixion scenario eventually. Quote: Heck, Nightcrawler's never even been able to answer his own spiritual questions. This is a guy who was ignorant enough to believe he'd become a priest of a religion he's supposedly known most of his life, but followed none of the steps to become a priest.Jean didn't go to Kurt to get answers. She went to him to give answers. Kurt is her Simon Peter. As for the bit where Kurt didn't know he was being duped about training for the priesthood - yeah, that story line was so stupid I discount it. No practicing Catholic could ever be so ignorant. Marvel obviously decided they didn't want Kurt to become a priest, so they came up with their ridiculous scenario. The fact that Kurt is the son of Azazel and has various encounters with the demonic realm would actually serve to deepen his spirituality. The truly spiritual are well versed in the dark side. They know the light and they know the dark. They feel both every day. Navigating between the two is almost the definition of real spirituality. Quote: You cannot be a nation without a plot of land. Period. That is what the UN deals with. Involving them in this is absurd, and frankly, this plan seeks to undermine every government in the world, including T'Challa's and Namor's (I don't see them going for this). This is exactly the sort of thing Xavier fought against.That part of the story was Jean going to the synagogues to be recognized. Cassandra Nova is Satan. A very interesting question is - Who will be Judas? My money's on Namor.
Posted with Google Chrome 63.0.3239.132 on Windows 10
| |
The Voice of Reason![]() Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008 Posts: 564 |
Subject: Re: X-Men Red #1: THAT's why?! [Re: emerick-man] Posted Sun Feb 11, 2018 at 02:29:51 pm EST (Viewed 156 times) |
I was completely underwhelmed by this book, disappointed and disheartened. I think the ideas kicked around on this board regarding the future of Jean upon her return were better than the execution of this issue. The concept is fine but wasn't this whole messiah thing done by both Cable and Nate the X-Man? The whole issue seemed rushed, contrived and woefully underdeveloped.
Posted with Google Chrome 64.0.3282.140 on MacOS X
|
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2021 Powermad Software |