![]() |
|
![]() |
Black Panther >> View Post |
|
| ||||||
Reply Subj: Is Black Panther Insignificant Under Hudlin? Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 at 04:02:44 pm EST (Viewed 1 times) | |||||||
I'd have to disagree with you post, somewhat. In terms of recognition from other writers and involvement in the MU at large, Priest's Panther was virtually non existant. Kurt used T'Challa as a stand in. Goeff Johns was the only writer who seemed to like Priest's take, and his stay on the Avengers were cut short. I don't recall if we were even given a reason as to why T'Challa left the Avengers before Disassembled. In terms of critical acclaim though, the title thrived. I don't recall reading any serious review that didn't have some form of praise for Priest. The majority of Panther fans loved his take. I doubt he recieved a fraction of the complaints Hudlin has. With Hudlin though, the opposite is true. Panther's had an X-Men crossover and some form of involvement in crossovers since day 1. He married Storm. Marvel is trying to make him the figure head of the international resistance to the Registration Act while also making him a member of the FF. He's certainly alot more high profile than he was under Priest. But in terms of writing, Panther often gets panned. Even it's strongest supporters describe it like an action movie. Characterization is all over the place at the best of times, and I doubt anyone believes that more thought was put into this series than Priest's. By the time Priest was at 25, he'd introduced several new enemies, revamped some old ones all while having a well rounded cast. Hudlin has nothing that remotely resembles that. 'Nuff said, IMO. | |||||||
Posted with Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 on Windows XP
| |||||||
|
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2021 Powermad Software |