Comic Battle >> View Post
·
Post By
ArtTeacher

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 5,217
In Reply To
atrimus

Location: Saint Louis, MO
Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 2,489
Subj: Another good point! *N/T*
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 04:22:48 pm CDT (Viewed 86 times)
Reply Subj: Re: umm...you do know that beams often give out...
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 04:17:16 pm CDT (Viewed 98 times)


> > > And, really, it's possible to HOLD UP the sky?
> > >
> > > You're so funny sometimes.
> >
> > As possible as it is to hold up Eternity.
>
> or push a planet without flying straight thru it, for that matter.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > > One of the principal ideas behind structural design is to distribute the load so that a ceiling or roof doesn't collapse. There is still weight acting on that beam, and we have 'engineering disasters' all the time in which a load bearing wall is insufficient to the task, and something collapses.
> > > >
> > > > Typically, supporting a weight is less difficult than lifting it because less stress is placed on smaller stabilization muscles and more of the load is supported by skeletal structure, but there's still a huge strength component to it.
> > > >
> > > > > > > What did you see anyone lift or press? Those are tests of strength... supporting something does not equate to strength.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > How do you support something without using strength?
> > > > >
> > > > > The same way one beam can support an entire ceiling.



Posted with Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 on Windows XP
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2022 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2022 by Comicboards/TVShowboards. Software Copyright © 2003-2022 Powermad Software