Subj: the SKY isn't tangible. ntPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 05:54:51 pm EDT (Viewed 92 times)
Reply Subj: Re: umm...you do know that beams often give out...
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 05:42:36 pm EDT (Viewed 64 times)
| > > And, really, it's possible to HOLD UP the sky?|
> > You're so funny sometimes.
> Ok well then and its possible to move a planet thats funny to. it goes both ways bud.
> > > One of the principal ideas behind structural design is to distribute the load so that a ceiling or roof doesn't collapse. There is still weight acting on that beam, and we have 'engineering disasters' all the time in which a load bearing wall is insufficient to the task, and something collapses.
> > >
> > > Typically, supporting a weight is less difficult than lifting it because less stress is placed on smaller stabilization muscles and more of the load is supported by skeletal structure, but there's still a huge strength component to it.
> > >
> > > > > > What did you see anyone lift or press? Those are tests of strength... supporting something does not equate to strength.
> > > > >
> > > > > How do you support something without using strength?
> > > >
> > > > The same way one beam can support an entire ceiling.