Comic Battle - The Emperor Has No Clothes On!

Post By

ArtTeacher

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 5,182

In Reply To

Primetime

Subj: The Emperor Has No Clothes On!
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 at 06:00:25 pm EST (Viewed 65 times)

Reply Subj: Re: Absurdity
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 at 02:29:35 pm EST (Viewed 8 times)

<< Prev

NewEmailPrintRSSIndex

Quote:

The problem is that folks post proof to you and you run away for a while and later come back pretending to have never seen such proof.

I'm glad other people are realizing this, too. I thought I had some special glasses on or something when I came to this site. $;\)$

Posted with Mozilla Firefox 3.5.6 on Windows XP

NewEmailPrintRSSIndex

Would the Hulk have been able to make it in the DC Universe ? · Frogger · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 12:09:24 pm EST
- I think he would be roughly the same in either universe....... · The Real Lance Eason · Mon Dec 28, 2009 at 04:05:29 am EST
- They would have to weaken him. · Zeeder · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 07:54:49 pm EST
- The Hulk would be very comfortable in a world full of Wonderman clones. (no text) · Fifthchild · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 07:31:32 pm EST
  - Haha! Nice. (no text) · Liam Gallagher's Unibrow · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 07:42:52 pm EST
    - I agree well played freind (no text) · Incriptus · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 11:05:22 pm EST
      - :-) (no text) · Fifthchild · Mon Dec 28, 2009 at 02:12:17 pm EST
- DC Hulk would have a GL harness and a Jetpack and be able to pull the moon out of orbit ;) · Daniel Craig · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 03:34:41 pm EST
- Re: Sure... · Primetime · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 03:14:08 pm EST
- Yes of Course, Even Better If He Was Beefed Up Though. · Daveym · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 01:14:48 pm EST
  - Humbug. The Hulk Is Way Above Tiny Mongul And Silly Kalibak. · Nucleon · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 05:04:59 pm EST
    - Re: Humbug. The Hulk Is Way Above Tiny Mongul And Silly Kalibak. · Primetime · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 05:27:14 pm EST
    - Proof, not Baiting Please. (no text) · Daveym · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 05:09:05 pm EST
      - The "Proof" You Seek... · Nucleon · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 05:27:44 pm EST
  - Re: Yes of Course, Even Better If He Was Beefed Up Though. · Primetime · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 03:08:30 pm EST
    - Re: Yes of Course, Even Better If He Was Beefed Up Though. · Daveym · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 04:24:37 pm EST
      - Re: Yes of Course, Even Better If He Was Beefed Up Though. · Primetime · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 05:22:55 pm EST
        
        Re: Yes of Course, Even Better If He Was Beefed Up Though. · Liam Gallagher's Unibrow · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 06:40:09 pm EST
        Re: Yes of Course, Even Better If He Was Beefed Up Though. · Daveym · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 05:47:49 pm EST
        
        Re: Yes of Course, Even Better If He Was Beefed Up Though. · Fifthchild · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 06:53:03 pm EST
        Re: Yes of Course, Even Better If He Was Beefed Up Though. · Primetime · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 06:24:55 pm EST
        
        Re: Yes of Course, Even Better If He Was Beefed Up Though. · Daveym · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 06:38:47 pm EST
        
        Re: Yes of Course, Even Better If He Was Beefed Up Though. · Primetime · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 07:19:49 pm EST
        
        I Knew It! · Daveym · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 08:01:12 pm EST
        
        Re: I Knew It! · Primetime · Sat Jan 02, 2010 at 11:00:34 pm EST
        Re: I Knew It! · Primetime · Sat Jan 02, 2010 at 10:58:46 pm EST
        Re: I Knew It! · Primetime · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 09:18:38 pm EST
        
        Re: I Knew It! · RodimusPrime · Mon Dec 28, 2009 at 02:37:48 am EST
        
        Re: I Knew It! · Primetime · Mon Dec 28, 2009 at 02:31:27 pm EST
        
        Re: I Knew It! · RodimusPrime · Tue Dec 29, 2009 at 05:47:44 pm EST
        
        Re: I Knew It! · Primetime · Wed Dec 30, 2009 at 10:20:47 pm EST
        
        Absurdity · Zeeder · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 08:39:10 pm EST
        
        Re: Absurdity · Daveym · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 08:47:58 pm EST
        
        To pick one point out of this rather sweeping debate, I don't think it necessarily took Herc, Wonder Man, She-Hulk, etc. to put Supes down..... · The Real Lance Eason · Mon Dec 28, 2009 at 04:01:16 am EST
        
        Re: To pick one point out of this rather sweeping debate, I don't think it necessarily took Herc, Wonder Man, She-Hulk, etc. to put Supes down..... · Daveym · Mon Dec 28, 2009 at 06:26:33 am EST
        
        Re: Absurdity · Primetime · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 10:05:02 pm EST
        Re: Absurdity · Zeeder · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 09:50:49 pm EST
        
        Re: Absurdity · Daveym · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 10:04:00 pm EST
        
        Re: Absurdity · Primetime · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 10:19:49 pm EST
        
        Re: Absurdity · Daveym · Mon Dec 28, 2009 at 06:30:44 am EST
        
        Re: Absurdity · Primetime · Mon Dec 28, 2009 at 01:55:25 pm EST
        Re: Absurdity · Olorin · Mon Dec 28, 2009 at 09:37:35 am EST
        
        Re: Absurdity · Daveym · Mon Dec 28, 2009 at 10:46:30 am EST
        
        Re: Absurdity · Primetime · Mon Dec 28, 2009 at 02:23:58 pm EST
        Re: Absurdity · Olorin · Mon Dec 28, 2009 at 11:46:05 am EST
        
        Re: Absurdity · Daveym · Mon Dec 28, 2009 at 01:56:43 pm EST
        
        Re: Absurdity · Olorin · Mon Dec 28, 2009 at 05:24:28 pm EST
        
        About Durok... · Vangrab · Tue Dec 29, 2009 at 05:52:36 am EST
        Well... · Vangrab · Tue Dec 29, 2009 at 05:40:30 am EST
        
        Re: Well... · Olorin · Tue Dec 29, 2009 at 09:19:19 am EST
        
        Re: Well... · Liam Gallagher's Unibrow · Tue Dec 29, 2009 at 02:05:40 pm EST
        
        Re: Absurdity · Daveym · Mon Dec 28, 2009 at 07:17:32 pm EST
        Re: Absurdity · Liam Gallagher's Unibrow · Mon Dec 28, 2009 at 05:39:53 pm EST
        
        Re: Absurdity · Primetime · Mon Dec 28, 2009 at 02:29:35 pm EST
        
        The Emperor Has No Clothes On! · ArtTeacher · Mon Dec 28, 2009 at 06:00:25 pm EST
        
        Re: Yes of Course, Even Better If He Was Beefed Up Though. · Fifthchild · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 07:08:07 pm EST
        
        We all know that's his standard operating procedure by now. I'd recommend stop engaging him and put him on ignore. It (mostly) wrks... (no text) · Jaysin1414 · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 08:11:41 pm EST
        
        You are right of course Jaysin. · Fifthchild · Mon Dec 28, 2009 at 01:55:23 pm EST
        Didn't the U.S. take this stance (at first) with Hitler? · ArtTeacher · Mon Dec 28, 2009 at 09:45:01 am EST
        Well Rather Than That... · Daveym · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 08:16:04 pm EST
        
        The whole point of my post, DaveyM, was that engaging with you... · Jaysin1414 · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 08:39:56 pm EST
        
        Beautifully put. (no text) · Fifthchild · Mon Dec 28, 2009 at 01:56:32 pm EST
        ~ * Post of the Decade * ~ · ArtTeacher · Mon Dec 28, 2009 at 09:50:46 am EST
        Re: The whole point of my post, DaveyM, was that engaging with you... · Daveym · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 09:11:47 pm EST
        
        It's Obvious. · Nucleon · Mon Dec 28, 2009 at 02:28:18 pm EST
        
        Not To Me! · Daveym · Mon Dec 28, 2009 at 03:18:28 pm EST
        
        Yet It's So Simple · Nucleon · Mon Dec 28, 2009 at 04:16:36 pm EST
        
        Re: Yet It's So Simple · Daveym · Mon Dec 28, 2009 at 04:47:45 pm EST
        
        Re: Yet It's So Simple · Primetime · Tue Dec 29, 2009 at 02:45:51 pm EST
        Re: Yet It's So Simple · Nucleon · Mon Dec 28, 2009 at 05:43:39 pm EST
        
        Re: Yet It's So Simple · Primetime · Tue Dec 29, 2009 at 02:47:38 pm EST
        
        Lying Rules! · ArtTeacher · Tue Dec 29, 2009 at 03:56:37 pm EST
        Re: Yet It's So Simple · Liam Gallagher's Unibrow · Tue Dec 29, 2009 at 03:03:14 pm EST
        
        Wow! · Fifthchild · Tue Dec 29, 2009 at 10:57:22 pm EST
        
        Honestly... · Would be Watcher · Wed Dec 30, 2009 at 06:23:29 am EST
        
        Re: Honestly... · Fifthchild · Wed Dec 30, 2009 at 08:14:46 am EST
        
        Of course · ArtTeacher · Thu Dec 31, 2009 at 05:08:38 pm EST
        
        (*Grunts*) · Nucleon · Tue Dec 29, 2009 at 04:57:07 pm EST
        Good point! (no text) · ArtTeacher · Tue Dec 29, 2009 at 03:45:10 pm EST
        small caveat here... · Would be Watcher · Tue Dec 29, 2009 at 03:32:13 pm EST
        
        Since you mentioned me by name... · ArtTeacher · Mon Dec 28, 2009 at 12:09:06 pm EST
        
        Re: Since you mentioned me by name... · HMB3 · Mon Dec 28, 2009 at 10:21:25 pm EST
  - If the Hulk existed in the DCverse, he'd be automatically beefed up anyway. (no text) · Maximum Man · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 02:45:53 pm EST
    - Not Necessarly Beefed Up Himself, But He Would Benefit From The Wonky Physics That Rules DCU (no text) · Nucleon · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 04:37:07 pm EST
      - You mean th eimaginary MU with magic and mutant genes that enable · RExxy · Mon Dec 28, 2009 at 12:34:22 pm EST
        
        Granted... · Nucleon · Tue Dec 29, 2009 at 06:06:11 pm EST
        You left out the little detail that it was Cosmic Gods that gave humans that latent ability. (no text) · Maximum Man · Mon Dec 28, 2009 at 12:38:42 pm EST
        
        and that makes DC physics wonkier than MU exactly how?? *NT* (no text) · Rexxy · Mon Dec 28, 2009 at 04:49:39 pm EST
    - That makes no sense. nt · Bootch · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 03:51:42 pm EST
      - Of Course it Does. · Daveym · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 04:04:42 pm EST
        
        Exactly... · Maximum Man · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 04:54:29 pm EST
        So if the Tick was in DC, he'd be Superman-level? Spooooon!. nt · Bootch · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 04:13:26 pm EST
        
        Re: So if the Tick was in DC, he'd be Superman-level? Spooooon!. nt · Daveym · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 04:35:18 pm EST
        
        Re: So if the Tick was in DC, he'd be Superman-level? Spooooon!. nt · smallfry · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 05:17:18 pm EST
        
        Re: So if the Tick was in DC, he'd be Superman-level? Spooooon!. nt · Daveym · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 05:31:27 pm EST
        
        Re: So if the Tick was in DC, he'd be Superman-level? Spooooon!. nt · Primetime · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 05:42:23 pm EST
        
        Re: So if the Tick was in DC, he'd be Superman-level? Spooooon!. nt · Daveym · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 05:58:16 pm EST
        
        Re: So if the Tick was in DC, he'd be Superman-level? Spooooon!. nt · Primetime · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 06:10:07 pm EST
        
        Re: So if the Tick was in DC, he'd be Superman-level? Spooooon!. nt · Daveym · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 06:27:16 pm EST
        
        Re: So if the Tick was in DC, he'd be Superman-level? Spooooon!. nt · Primetime · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 08:15:02 pm EST
        
        Re: So if the Tick was in DC, he'd be Superman-level? Spooooon!. nt · Daveym · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 08:40:47 pm EST
        
        Re: So if the Tick was in DC, he'd be Superman-level? Spooooon!. nt · Primetime · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 09:50:19 pm EST
        
        So, did the chain break first, or Hercules simply failed to hold together entire city/Manhattan? · Vangrab · Mon Dec 28, 2009 at 08:09:19 am EST
        
        Re: The chains broke first. His strength never failed to hold the city together. (no text) · Primetime · Mon Dec 28, 2009 at 02:40:23 pm EST
        
        Re: So if the Tick was in DC, he'd be Superman-level? Spooooon!. nt · Destroyer · Sun Dec 27, 2009 at 11:40:56 pm EST
        
        Re: So if the Tick was in DC, he'd be Superman-level? Spooooon!. nt · rc · Mon Dec 28, 2009 at 12:49:22 am EST