|Comic Battle >> View Post|
Subj: Re: Except...
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 at 02:05:46 pm EST (Viewed 58 times)
Reply Subj: Re: Except...
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 at 12:03:20 pm EST (Viewed 46 times)
Quote:Were you drunk when you made your original post or something?!
Is this necessary? It's incredibly rude and I don't think I said anything to warrant this type of response. I've always been very respectful toward you and your opinions... I don't think I deserve this type of treatment.
Quote:CHAD said that Iron Man was durable "enough" to last against the big guys *for long enough to win*. He said nothing about being able to last indefinitely.
CHAD wrote: "He's durable enough to last against HULK, SURFER, and TERRAX in order to beat them , he sure as heck can do the same versus Wonder bread woman."
I responded with: "He couldn't against Sentry."
I wasn't implying he didn't win the fight. Quite the contrary. And if the archive feature is working you can view my thoughts on the fight when the issue came out. Tony won fair and square. There is no debating it whatsoever. But the issue also made it clear that physically Tony was outmatched. He was in trouble. There was no way he could withstand Sentry... he was being tossed around like a rag doll.
Quote:You, in return, then flat-out said that Iron Man was not able to last long enough against Sentry to win.... which is exactly what he did.
The fact that Iron Man had to find OTHER means to win proves that he wasn't able to physically last against Sentry.
I'm not really sure why this point is being contested. If the armor was able to withstand a full on Sentry onslaught then there would have been no reason for Tony to need to find alternative means to defeat Sentry.
Posted with Google Chrome 22.214.171.124 on Windows XP
|Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2022 Powermad Software|