Comic Battle >> View Post
·
Post By
Odin's illegitimate Son

In Reply To
Fifthchild

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 9,474
Subj: First of all, "jobbing" has been widely misused in this message board.
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 at 03:19:11 pm EST (Viewed 30 times)
Reply Subj: Jobbing: Is it always a bad thing?
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 at 08:15:47 pm EST (Viewed 150 times)

Previous Post


It's pretty common to hear people complaining about jobbing when we see a fight that theoretically should be a stomp end up as a competitive affair. But is this always a bad thing? Should fights be written in a logically rigorous fashion or is it better that writers flex the rules a bit, or even a lot, so as to make for a good fight? 


For myself I think I was a bit more of a "purist" back in the day but nowadays I think I see the merits of being a bit more laid back about such things.


According to wrestling vernacular (where the term originated), it simply means "to lose". To "job" is to "lose". When a wrestler agrees to lose the match, he is only doing his "job", hence the term.

But in this message board, it means, "not fighting the way one character is supposed to fight". It's like saying, "oh, the Hulk should have toasted that guy in 3 seconds instead of 5 minutes, to my eyes he jobbed, because he should have done it more easily".... That is just plain wrong.

So, goingback to your question, "is jobbing always a bad thing?".... according to your premise, "it shouldn't be, in order to make the fight more enjoyable...a good fight"....well, then, this is already wrong. Any loss is a "job", regardless whether the fight is good or bad.


Posted with Microsoft Internet Explorer 7 on Windows Vista
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2022 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2022 by Comicboards/TVShowboards. Software Copyright © 2003-2022 Powermad Software