Comic Battle >> View Post
·
Post By
Olorin

In Reply To
abhijit

Subj: Re: Superman vs Thor: Comparison
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2017 at 02:35:53 pm EST (Viewed 6 times)
Reply Subj: Re: Superman vs Thor: Comparison
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2017 at 12:46:35 am EST (Viewed 165 times)

Previous Post


    Quote:
    As Primetime said below, I don't think he used the lightning.


He did. He even amped up mjolnir with it.


    Quote:
    And even if Jurgens said Superman was more powerful in some interview (which I think other posters may have refuted in this thread), if it didn't happen in the comic it doesn't matter much. Like my opinion on the matter doesn't matter much:


Except he wrote Superman as perhaps the most powerful hero on both DC and Marvel earths where he explicitly mentioned Thor.

So no, its not just an interview.


    Quote:
    I think Thor is a better fighter and has greater energy projection. I'd say Thor has greater ability to come back from serious injury (better healing). Superman has better maneuverability and hard durability. I wouldn't be against giving Supes a slight strength advantage either. I think Mjolnir packs a harder punch than either on their own. And it allows Thor to absorb energy projection thrown at him (like heat vision). Given Supes' magic vulnerability, I think it's a very fair fight. I give the edge to Thor unless Supes uses speed blitzing a lot.


Ironically, Superman is better than Thor in all of those save maybe energy projection. He has better fighting feats, better healing feats and much, much stronger. If you want, we can do a feat war.

Mjolnir doesn't hits as hard as Superman does as well.

Thor did not use a lightning bolt attack in this fight as Primetime detailed below. He may have charged Mjolnir. I believe those are different things.

Regarding Reed's comment:

1) Reed's "Perhaps" comment does not mean much, if anything. In the comic, if Reed somehow hooked up both Superman and Thor to a machine and it measured their power output and Superman outclassed Thor then yes, that would mean something. But that didn't come close to happening.

2) Reed's comment may not have even reflected the writer's actual thoughts on the matter. The writer may have just used the comment because it helped the narrative. You don't know the writer's thoughts or motivations.

3) And even IF it was the writer's belief that Superman is greater than Thor, what does that matter? Other writers believe differently. If it's not shown in the comic (and one character's uncertain thoughts on the matter don't count), it doesn't matter. Reed's in-comic statement bears little to no weight because it was not a quantitative analysis and he himself was uncertain ("perhaps"). It was a throw-away comment.

Regarding Thor's power vs. Superman:
If your opinion is that Superman is greater than Thor at everything except energy projection, you're entitled to it. But I think they are relative peers. By the very nature of comics, everything varies so much. And there are also different ways fans interpret this variation. Some fans go with the original take on a character. Some fans take a characters' best showings. Some fans try to average out showings to derive out what you would typically expect from a character. But some of what you're saying is hard to back up.




Posted with Google Chrome 55.0.2883.87 on Windows 7
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2018 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2018 by Alvaro Ortiz and Dave Galanter. Software Copyright © 2003-2018 Powermad Software