Comic Battle >> View Post
·
Post By
Knight

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 8,314
In Reply To
Reverend Meteor

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 6,394
Subj: Re: I think you underrate her a bit...
Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2017 at 05:20:39 pm EDT (Viewed 65 times)
Reply Subj: Re: I think you underrate her a bit...
Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2017 at 02:52:32 pm EDT (Viewed 68 times)

Previous Post



    Quote:
    We know vamps are stronger than humans, at least on average.... though I don't think all of them are peak human based on performance against Scoobies....but maybe peak for their body size and musculature....And older more elite vampires in the Cap to 1 ton range


Buffy > vampires > humans

She might not be able to beat up Thor or Hulk but she just has to be stronger than Cap. He's a human at the peak of human ability...so ok maybe he can match a weak vampire's strength...but she should still be way stronger than that. She's got to be past a human at the top of his game and into genuine super human territory or the whole mythology falls apart IMO.



Sorry, but even Comic Cap has better strength feats than Buffy.





It's interesting that a hero/villain performs one amazing feat, or use a power they haven't used for 20+ years, and that automatically propels them to a high status despite scans and evidence to the contrary. I don't know what is worse, selective feat picking that has only been done once or twice 20, or more, years ago or ignoring evidence from scans or the lack thereof. We need to stop putting our favorite heroes/villains on pedestals and start putting them where they really belong.
Posted with Mozilla 11.0 on Windows 7
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2017 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2017 by Alvaro Ortiz and Dave Galanter. Software Copyright © 2003-2017 Powermad Software