Comic Battle >> View Post
·
Post By
Knight

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 8,581
In Reply To
Braugi

Member Since: Fri Jul 14, 2017
Posts: 219
Subj: Re: in light of some of the Buffy discussion...revisiting something from a couple months ago
Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2017 at 05:31:54 pm EDT (Viewed 82 times)
Reply Subj: in light of some of the Buffy discussion...revisiting something from a couple months ago
Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2017 at 12:59:39 pm EDT (Viewed 90 times)

Previous Post

rank the following in terms of strength, speed, fighting ability, and overall effectiveness...then who would win in fights against each other.

Steve Austin (6 million dollar man)
TV Hulk (Lou F.)
TV Wonder Woman (Linda Carter)
Buffy
Angel


Your overselling Buffy's strength, Braugi. She's no where near 3 to 4 ton lifting strength. If she was that high, she wouldn't have struggled breaking chains, hand-cuffs and what not. She's barely above comic Cap's strength level, IF that.

STRENGTH:

Hulk (TV)
Wonder Woman (Linda Carter)
Steve Austin (6 Million Dollar Man)
Buffy Summers
Angel

SPEED:

Wonder Woman (Linda Carter)
Steve Austin (6 Million Dollar Man)
Buffy Summers
Angel
Hulk (TV) (Never did see him run, so who knows how fast of a runner he is. I've seen him jog, but not run. Then again, I only watched a few episodes of that borefest TV show).

REACTIONS:

Wonder Woman (Linda Carter)
Buffy Summers
Angel
Steve Austin and Hulk (TV)

FIGHTS

Hulk (TV) Vs. any of them on the above lists. I think Hulk wins against any of them one-on-one.

Wonder Woman (Linda Carter) Vs. beats everyone one-on-one, except Hulk.

Steve Austin Vs. Buffy or Angel. I think Steve beats either one-on-one due to his superior strength.

Buffy Summers Vs. Angel. Didn't they already fight? Buffy wins, but loses to everyone listed above.







It's interesting that a hero/villain performs one amazing feat, or use a power they haven't used for 20+ years, and that automatically propels them to a high status despite scans and evidence to the contrary. I don't know what is worse, selective feat picking that has only been done once or twice 20, or more, years ago or ignoring evidence from scans or the lack thereof. We need to stop putting our favorite heroes/villains on pedestals and start putting them where they really belong. But it's evident that people never will because they would rather accuse others of cherry picking feats, when they don't, and being 'morally superior' when they aren't. I guess being honest and as fair as possible only opens one up to being the target of childish accusations and fault finding by those who insist on acting petty and childish. What happened to a good debate between two civil, mature, adults?
Posted with Mozilla 11.0 on Windows 7
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2017 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2017 by Alvaro Ortiz and Dave Galanter. Software Copyright © 2003-2017 Powermad Software