Comic Battle - Re: Darkseid vs Wonder Woman: WW 36 spoilers

Post By

zvelf

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 12,163

In Reply To

motifian

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 3,077

Subj: Re: Darkseid vs Wonder Woman: WW 36 spoilers
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2017 at 01:58:22 pm EST (Viewed 246 times)

Reply Subj: Re: Darkseid vs Wonder Woman: WW 36 spoilers
Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2017 at 10:42:27 pm EST (Viewed 203 times)

<< Prev

NewEmailPrintRSSIndex

Next >>

I've already thoroughly dismantled your points that you can only incoherently repeat what you've said before or just make up stuff out of the blue like this blatant lie, "Batman had seen enough of the fight before that. He was only gone for retrieving Superman and Darkseid was already blinded" considering Batman left in the issue before the remaining JL engaged Darkseid and blinded him. So I'll just address a couple of things...

Quote:

Of course he was. He was on his knees with Thor standing over him.

Okay, from now on I will note why you lack credibility by pointing out you're the only person who thinks that Thor is more powerful than Odin.

Quote:

Because Zeus wasn't on his knees like that weakling Odin.

Okay, from now on I will note why you lack credibility by pointing out you're the only person who thinks that Marvel's premiere skyfather is a weakling.

Quote:

He is only injured by weapons enchanted by himself.

Okay. I stand corrected on Ares' axe.

Quote:

He had beaten Zeus without the Aegis as well. Later Zeus could only imprison him with dropping mount Edna on him.

No. Zeus apparently feared him (but note that this story is being told by Typhon), but when they fought, Zeus won.

Quote:

And Aegis only returned the kinetic force back. It didn't power up Typhon.

Giving Typhon the power to deflect the offense of his opponents against themselves is a huge power up!

Quote:

There is always context behind the things you mention but I think you can't be reasoned with the blind hatred for anything DC related that you have.

So you're accusing me of ignoring context when you just used an example to imply Hercules > Typhon > Zeus while ignoring that Zeus was not normal Zeus, Typhon was amped by the Aegis, and that Hercules used amnesia water to win. Wow.

Exactly. Just giving you your own medicine.

Okay, from now on I will note why you lack credibility by pointing out you purposely and consciously used an example you knew was misleading. And also having a 4-year old's understanding of ethics.

Quote:

Also, I don't hate DC at all. Some of my favorite characters are DC characters, and anyone who's been on this board for a long time knows I'm a huge fan of Power Girl, Cassandra Cain, Black Canary, and Watchmen.

Yes, you do. It'd clear for anyone reading your posts.

Posted with Mozilla 11.0 on Windows 7

NewEmailPrintRSSIndex

Darkseid vs Wonder Woman: WW 36 spoilers · motifian · Wed Dec 13, 2017 at 07:48:33 am EST
- Re: Darkseid vs Wonder Woman: WW 36 spoilers · zvelf · Wed Dec 13, 2017 at 11:23:38 pm EST
  - Re: Darkseid vs Wonder Woman: WW 36 spoilers · motifian · Thu Dec 14, 2017 at 02:00:11 am EST
    - Re: Darkseid vs Wonder Woman: WW 36 spoilers · zvelf · Thu Dec 14, 2017 at 10:17:28 pm EST
      - Re: Darkseid vs Wonder Woman: WW 36 spoilers · motifian · Fri Dec 15, 2017 at 12:22:16 am EST
        
        Re: Darkseid vs Wonder Woman: WW 36 spoilers · Primetime · Fri Dec 15, 2017 at 10:49:15 am EST
        
        Re: Darkseid vs Wonder Woman: WW 36 spoilers · motifian · Fri Dec 15, 2017 at 10:58:05 am EST
        
        Re: Darkseid vs Wonder Woman: WW 36 spoilers · Primetime · Fri Dec 15, 2017 at 04:49:50 pm EST
        
        Re: Darkseid vs Wonder Woman: WW 36 spoilers · motifian · Fri Dec 15, 2017 at 08:56:44 pm EST
        
        Re: Darkseid vs Wonder Woman: WW 36 spoilers · Primetime · Fri Dec 15, 2017 at 11:10:35 pm EST
        
        Re: Darkseid vs Wonder Woman: WW 36 spoilers · motifian · Sat Dec 16, 2017 at 11:15:33 am EST
        
        Re: Darkseid vs Wonder Woman: WW 36 spoilers · Primetime · Sat Dec 16, 2017 at 04:41:27 pm EST
        
        Re: Darkseid vs Wonder Woman: WW 36 spoilers · motifian · Sun Dec 17, 2017 at 02:57:22 am EST
        
        Re: Darkseid vs Wonder Woman: WW 36 spoilers · zvelf · Fri Dec 15, 2017 at 12:33:37 pm EST
        
        Re: Darkseid vs Wonder Woman: WW 36 spoilers · motifian · Fri Dec 15, 2017 at 09:06:15 pm EST
        
        Re: Darkseid vs Wonder Woman: WW 36 spoilers · zvelf · Sun Dec 17, 2017 at 09:55:07 am EST
        
        Re: Darkseid vs Wonder Woman: WW 36 spoilers · motifian · Sun Dec 17, 2017 at 11:22:29 am EST
        
        Re: Darkseid vs Wonder Woman: WW 36 spoilers · zvelf · Sun Dec 17, 2017 at 10:07:52 pm EST
        
        Re: Darkseid vs Wonder Woman: WW 36 spoilers · motifian · Sun Dec 17, 2017 at 10:42:27 pm EST
        
        Re: Darkseid vs Wonder Woman: WW 36 spoilers · zvelf · Mon Dec 18, 2017 at 01:58:22 pm EST
        
        Re: Darkseid vs Wonder Woman: WW 36 spoilers · motifian · Tue Dec 19, 2017 at 12:19:19 am EST
        
        Re: Darkseid vs Wonder Woman: WW 36 spoilers · zvelf · Tue Dec 19, 2017 at 02:42:47 pm EST
        
        Re: Darkseid vs Wonder Woman: WW 36 spoilers · motifian · Thu Dec 21, 2017 at 12:23:23 am EST
        
        Re: Credibility revealed · zvelf · Fri Dec 22, 2017 at 12:28:40 am EST
        
        Re: Credibility revealed · motifian · Fri Dec 22, 2017 at 10:08:33 pm EST
        
        Re: Credibility revealed · zvelf · Sat Dec 23, 2017 at 01:02:15 am EST
        
        Re: Credibility revealed · motifian · Sat Dec 23, 2017 at 11:25:56 am EST
        
        Re: Credibility revealed · zvelf · Mon Dec 25, 2017 at 02:50:07 pm EST
        
        Re: Credibility revealed · motifian · Tue Dec 26, 2017 at 05:58:44 am EST
        
        Re: Credibility revealed · zvelf · Tue Dec 26, 2017 at 11:36:23 pm EST
        
        Re: Credibility revealed · motifian · Thu Dec 28, 2017 at 11:15:18 pm EST
        
        Re: Credibility revealed · zvelf · Fri Dec 29, 2017 at 10:17:57 am EST
        
        Re: Darkseid vs Wonder Woman: WW 36 spoilers · Primetime · Mon Dec 18, 2017 at 08:48:47 am EST
        
        Re: Darkseid vs Wonder Woman: WW 36 spoilers · motifian · Mon Dec 18, 2017 at 10:55:06 am EST
        
        Re: Darkseid vs Wonder Woman: WW 36 spoilers · Primetime · Mon Dec 18, 2017 at 11:35:00 am EST
        
        Re: Darkseid vs Wonder Woman: WW 36 spoilers · motifian · Tue Dec 19, 2017 at 12:22:59 am EST
        
        Re: Darkseid vs Wonder Woman: WW 36 spoilers · zvelf · Fri Dec 22, 2017 at 11:20:10 am EST
        
        Re: Darkseid vs Wonder Woman: WW 36 spoilers · motifian · Fri Dec 22, 2017 at 10:12:25 pm EST
        
        Re: Darkseid vs Wonder Woman: WW 36 spoilers · zvelf · Sat Dec 23, 2017 at 12:55:59 am EST
        
        Re: Darkseid vs Wonder Woman: WW 36 spoilers · motifian · Sat Dec 23, 2017 at 10:50:33 am EST
        
        Re: Darkseid vs Wonder Woman: WW 36 spoilers · zvelf · Mon Dec 25, 2017 at 02:56:51 pm EST
        
        Re: Darkseid vs Wonder Woman: WW 36 spoilers · motifian · Tue Dec 26, 2017 at 06:00:50 am EST
- Man, Darkseid would butcher Thanos (no text) · Bk Ray · Wed Dec 13, 2017 at 03:42:52 pm EST
  - Re: Man, Darkseid would butcher Thanos · Primetime · Mon Dec 18, 2017 at 05:05:04 pm EST
  - Nah. (no text) · Poltargyst · Wed Dec 13, 2017 at 11:18:30 pm EST
    - Thanos' stock has lowered, Darkseid's has risen. This is the new way. (no text) · Bk Ray · Thu Dec 14, 2017 at 03:04:53 am EST
      - Not sure if they've switched positions on average yet, but its certainly heading that way · Braugi · Thu Dec 14, 2017 at 11:36:45 am EST
        
        Re: Not sure if they've switched positions on average yet, but its certainly heading that way · Primetime · Thu Dec 14, 2017 at 02:41:36 pm EST
        
        Using the JLA and Avengers as guidelines is silly · Bk Ray · Fri Dec 15, 2017 at 12:40:41 pm EST
        
        Re: Using the JLA and Avengers as guidelines is silly · PT · Wed Dec 20, 2017 at 10:27:09 am EST
        Re: Using the JLA and Avengers as guidelines is silly · Primetime · Fri Dec 15, 2017 at 03:40:23 pm EST
        
        Lets have a look at this then · Bk Ray · Sat Dec 16, 2017 at 03:23:28 am EST
        Re: Using the JLA and Avengers as guidelines is silly · motifian · Fri Dec 15, 2017 at 09:15:38 pm EST
        
        Re: Using the JLA and Avengers as guidelines is silly · Primetime · Fri Dec 15, 2017 at 11:20:36 pm EST
        
        Re: Using the JLA and Avengers as guidelines is silly · motifian · Sat Dec 16, 2017 at 05:54:33 am EST
        
        Re: Using the JLA and Avengers as guidelines is silly · zvelf · Sun Dec 17, 2017 at 10:23:06 pm EST
        
        If it takes 6 of the most powerful Avengers to take him down (and then they in turn are beaten by Aquaman) he's not helpless · Bk Ray · Sat Dec 16, 2017 at 03:20:46 am EST
        
        Re: If it takes 6 of the most powerful Avengers to take him down (and then they in turn are beaten by Aquaman) he's not helpless · Primetime · Sat Dec 16, 2017 at 04:15:12 pm EST
        
        Re: If it takes 6 of the most powerful Avengers to take him down (and then they in turn are beaten by Aquaman) he's not helpless · motifian · Sun Dec 17, 2017 at 03:00:38 am EST
        
        Re: If it takes 6 of the most powerful Avengers to take him down (and then they in turn are beaten by Aquaman) he's not helpless · Primetime · Wed Dec 27, 2017 at 03:53:16 pm EST
        
        Re: If it takes 6 of the most powerful Avengers to take him down (and then they in turn are beaten by Aquaman) he's not helpless · Bk Ray · Sat Dec 16, 2017 at 06:45:50 pm EST
        
        Re: If it takes 6 of the most powerful Avengers to take him down (and then they in turn are beaten by Aquaman) he's not helpless · Primetime · Sat Dec 16, 2017 at 08:33:28 pm EST
        
        Re: If it takes 6 of the most powerful Avengers to take him down (and then they in turn are beaten by Aquaman) he's not helpless · motifian · Sun Dec 17, 2017 at 03:10:20 am EST
        
        Re: If it takes 6 of the most powerful Avengers to take him down (and then they in turn are beaten by Aquaman) he's not helpless · Primetime · Sun Dec 17, 2017 at 12:09:35 pm EST
        
        Re: If it takes 6 of the most powerful Avengers to take him down (and then they in turn are beaten by Aquaman) he's not helpless · motifian · Sun Dec 17, 2017 at 10:11:15 pm EST
        
        Re: If it takes 6 of the most powerful Avengers to take him down (and then they in turn are beaten by Aquaman) he's not helpless · Primetime · Mon Dec 18, 2017 at 03:56:39 pm EST
        
        Re: If it takes 6 of the most powerful Avengers to take him down (and then they in turn are beaten by Aquaman) he's not helpless · motifian · Tue Dec 19, 2017 at 12:24:42 am EST
        Re: If it takes 6 of the most powerful Avengers to take him down (and then they in turn are beaten by Aquaman) he's not helpless · Bk Ray · Mon Dec 18, 2017 at 04:36:11 pm EST
        
        Re: If it takes 6 of the most powerful Avengers to take him down (and then they in turn are beaten by Aquaman) he's not helpless · Primetime · Mon Dec 18, 2017 at 04:56:06 pm EST
        
        Re: If it takes 6 of the most powerful Avengers to take him down (and then they in turn are beaten by Aquaman) he's not helpless · Bk Ray · Mon Dec 18, 2017 at 05:22:43 pm EST
        
        Re: I could make this my new sig right? (no text) · Primetime · Tue Dec 19, 2017 at 09:52:07 am EST
        
        If you want (no text) · Bk Ray · Tue Dec 19, 2017 at 11:31:18 am EST
        
        Re: If it takes 6 of the most powerful Avengers to take him down (and then they in turn are beaten by Aquaman) he's not helpless · Primetime · Mon Dec 18, 2017 at 05:33:07 pm EST
        
        that is going to be my sig from now on (no text) · Bk Ray · Tue Dec 19, 2017 at 03:41:10 am EST
        
        Thanks, couldn't find the scan · Bk Ray · Sun Dec 17, 2017 at 03:44:41 am EST
        
        Re: Thanks, couldn't find the scan · Primetime · Sun Dec 17, 2017 at 12:12:23 pm EST
        
        Re: Thanks, couldn't find the scan · Bk Ray · Sun Dec 17, 2017 at 12:19:17 pm EST
        
        Re: Thanks, couldn't find the scan · Primetime · Sun Dec 17, 2017 at 01:42:46 pm EST
        
        Re: Thanks, couldn't find the scan · motifian · Sun Dec 17, 2017 at 10:13:40 pm EST
        
        Ah, so you have changed your tack, · Bk Ray · Sun Dec 17, 2017 at 03:04:50 am EST
        
        Re: Ah, so you have changed your tack, · Primetime · Sun Dec 17, 2017 at 12:04:15 pm EST
        
        Re: Ah, so you have changed your tack, · Bk Ray · Sun Dec 17, 2017 at 12:18:07 pm EST
        
        Re: Ah, so you have changed your tack, · Primetime · Sun Dec 17, 2017 at 01:55:36 pm EST
        
        Re: Ah, so you have changed your tack, · motifian · Sun Dec 17, 2017 at 10:18:46 pm EST
        
        Re: Ah, so you have changed your tack, · Primetime · Tue Dec 19, 2017 at 09:47:03 am EST
        Re: Ah, so you have changed your tack, · zvelf · Sun Dec 17, 2017 at 11:23:21 pm EST
        
        Re: Ah, so you have changed your tack, · motifian · Mon Dec 18, 2017 at 05:49:08 am EST
        
        Re: Ah, so you have changed your tack, · zvelf · Mon Dec 18, 2017 at 02:07:06 pm EST
        
        Re: Ah, so you have changed your tack, · motifian · Tue Dec 19, 2017 at 12:29:20 am EST
        
        Re: Ah, so you have changed your tack, · zvelf · Tue Dec 19, 2017 at 02:50:21 pm EST
        
        Re: Ah, so you have changed your tack, · Bk Ray · Mon Dec 18, 2017 at 07:14:36 am EST
        
        Re: Ah, so you have changed your tack, · motifian · Mon Dec 18, 2017 at 05:45:06 am EST
        Re: Ah, so you have changed your tack, · Primetime · Mon Dec 18, 2017 at 12:12:51 am EST
        
        Re: Ah, so you have changed your tack, · Bk Ray · Sun Dec 17, 2017 at 04:55:07 pm EST
        
        Re: Ah, so you have changed your tack, · Primetime · Mon Dec 18, 2017 at 08:47:01 am EST
        
        Re: Ah, so you have changed your tack, · motifian · Mon Dec 18, 2017 at 10:58:23 am EST
        
        Re: Ah, so you have changed your tack, · Primetime · Mon Dec 18, 2017 at 11:47:01 am EST
        
        Re: Ah, so you have changed your tack, · motifian · Tue Dec 19, 2017 at 12:31:53 am EST
        
        Re: Ah, so you have changed your tack, · Primetime · Tue Dec 19, 2017 at 09:34:10 am EST
        
        Re: Ah, so you have changed your tack, · motifian · Tue Dec 19, 2017 at 10:53:55 am EST
        
        Re: Ah, so you have changed your tack, · Primetime · Tue Dec 19, 2017 at 11:11:58 am EST
        
        Re: Ah, so you have changed your tack, · motifian · Wed Dec 20, 2017 at 12:18:24 am EST
        
        Re: Ah, so you have changed your tack, · Primetime · Wed Dec 20, 2017 at 07:02:13 am EST
        
        Re: Ah, so you have changed your tack, · motifian · Wed Dec 20, 2017 at 08:42:02 am EST
        
        Re: Ah, so you have changed your tack, · Primetime · Wed Dec 20, 2017 at 10:22:21 am EST
        
        Re: Ah, so you have changed your tack, · motifian · Thu Dec 21, 2017 at 12:12:00 am EST
        
        Re: Ah, so you have changed your tack, · Primetime · Thu Dec 21, 2017 at 05:11:45 pm EST
        
        Re: Ah, so you have changed your tack, · motifian · Thu Dec 21, 2017 at 09:44:47 pm EST
        
        Re: Ah, so you have changed your tack, · Primetime · Wed Dec 27, 2017 at 03:59:15 pm EST
        
        I love this · Bk Ray · Thu Dec 21, 2017 at 06:26:04 pm EST
  - Re: Not based on that showing. (no text) · Primetime · Wed Dec 13, 2017 at 07:52:51 pm EST