You have already written in this thread that Odin is a weakling and you think Thor beats Odin in a fight! You have no credibility.




Indeed, I am about to be even moreso...




Desperation to see concession where there is none accepted.







I see. So according to you what direction you get knocked down in determines whether you're a weakling. If you fall forward, you're a weakling. If you fall backward, you're not. Wow, what other laughably ridiculous laws of fight depictions can motifian come up with?




Yes! Doubling down on the knee defense! I love it.




It's too late. You can't admit to being deliberately misleading on this example and then continue to do so as if you didn't already admit it. You have no credibility.

Quote:


Quote:


Quote:


Quote:
Giving Typhon the power to deflect the offense of his opponents against themselves is a huge power up!
Only kinetic energy. And he killed Zeus physically.
Do you know what kinetic energy is? Again, this was a Zeus who was in the form of a human child, with the word "human" emphasized in the issue, who had lost his memory and had no experience with his power.
Yes, I know what it is. Do you?

Are you a fifth grader by any chance? So let's look at your claim that the Aegis armor isn't significant. It creates an impenetrable force field, absorbs energy directed at it, and can redirect that energy against the attacker:





No, you're just flat wrong. Here are the scans explicitly showing that Zeus had not regained his memories. "In your new form, you don't remember," Hera tells Zeus. Then child Zeus and Hera both attack Typhon and again the comic explicitly shows the Aegis armor deflecting their attacks back on them, killing Hera. You're wrong and prove again and again, you have no credibility.





You were trying to show that Marvel Zeus wasn't that powerful by saying Typhon beat Zeus and Hercules beat Typhon while ignoring that this wasn't normal Zeus but amnesiac human child Zeus, that this wasn't normal Typhon because he was powered up by the Aegis, and that Hercules didn't beat Typhon with his own power but used the waters of Lethe. If that's not misleading, I don't know what is. And then you claimed that Zeus had regained his memories when he had not, which is plainly stated in the scans above. You have no credibility.


Hmm, obviously I know what it is better than you. Please explain how my posting good things about DC characters for years and years on this board works as reverse psychology.


Wow, you're so confused, you're responding to your own insults as if they were directed at yourself. You wrote both of the above lines. I am amused.


Odin usually dominates Thor in a way that Darkseid does not dominate Superman.



No surprise there.



No. We both try to be as unbiased as we can in evaluating fights even when they involve our favorite characters. We may not always succeed, but we try. You, however, try to put over your favorite, evidence be damned. It's just distort, distort, distort.


As I said, it depended on how you define skyfather. Spectre is all over the place and sometimes is skyfather level, sometimes even lower. Nekron is also all over the place and sometimes below skyfather level.


I never said that. Wow, just outright lying now. Modern day Spectre, on average is more powerful than Odin, but Spectre has had showings in which he appeared less powerful than Odin's average.



Thunderbolt has long been a member of the JSA. Interesting how Thunderbolt and the JSA didn't instantly beat every villain Spectre level and below in all those years. So tell me which top tier Marvel characters beat Superman a majority of the time?

By the way, Abhijit / Abhilegend, you know you're not supposed to use two different aliases here, right? And I just found another instance in which you lack all credibility: when you stated a bomb that destroyed one fifth of the universe wasn't that powerful:

https://www.comicboards.com/php/show.php?rpy=comicbattles-2017021000483936&layout=thread