Even before I clicked on that link, somehow I knew you were going to be grasping at straws. That scan doesn't say that. It only says the waters of Lethe transformed Zeus into the body he's in now. However, this scan plainly states that Zeus is a "HUMAN child". Now why would Greg Pak use that language if Zeus were not a HUMAN child?







Except that wasn't what you were trying to show. You used the Odin example as an analogy to show why Wonder Woman wasn't hurt. You were saying Wonder Woman wasn't hurt by Darkseid's blindside just as Odin wasn't hurt by Thor knocking him down. But now you've been plainly revealed to be using a double standard.
One of the reasons I debate people in depth is because I have a fascination with how the human mind works, particularly when it comes to irrationality. I am personally very oriented toward pure logic, nearing Mr. Spock levels, which is probably not emotionally healthy. I don't normally get very emotional except for being incredulous if that's an emotion. I know people much smarter than me but I do consider myself reasonably smart and expect others to respond on a similar intellectual plane, and I'm astounded by outright stupidity. In any case, given my perspective, I am very puzzled by just how illogical people can be. So many people have an end goal belief and then choose their reasons to fit that goal rather than going the opposite route, the logical route of looking at all the reasons to support or not support something and then choosing to support or not support it based on those reasons. Doing the former, choosing your reasons on the fly, like you seem to do all the time, leads to the ridiculous contradictions I've been pointing out.

Even more fascinating is that you refuse to admit you're ever wrong about anything and so you keep doubling down on absurdities and obfuscate and distort until you don't even know what you're arguing any more. You first brought up the Thor knocking over Odin example to demonstrate that Odin wasn't hurt just like Darkseid knocking down Wonder Woman didn't mean she was hurt. But your Marvel hatred is so strong, that morphed into you thinking Odin was hurt and that Odin is a weakling. And then I brought up the example of Wonder Woman knocking down Zeus, and your only defense was that Zeus fell on his back so it's meaningless but Odin fell on his knees and so he's "seriously hurt." Come on! Then you literally ended up responding to your own insult that you tossed at me, mistakening it as something I said to you in our last thread. My writing style isn't even like yours. And after you accused me of hating DC and I showed you numerous posts in which I praised or advocated for DC characters, you stated that I wasn't sincere in these posts and was only doing so with an ulterior motive. I've been posting here for about 15 years, and you think I've been secretly lying about DC characters for all that time? That's just crazy talk.
I seriously hope you're not like this in real life because otherwise your life is just a series of continuously deluding yourself and making up reasons to support a choice already made instead of considering reasons to make a choice.

Quote:


Quote:


Quote:


Quote:


Quote:


Quote:
Or when between losing the argument or being a hypocrite, you chose to be a hypocrite by claiming Thor knocking down Odin shows Odin to be a weakling but Wonder Woman knocking down DC Zeus means nothing.
Because both are not similar. Zeus wasn't on his hands and knees.
Right, because if you fall forward, you're a weakling and if you fall backward, getting knocked down means nothing. It's pretty clear you're the one getting the drubbing here.
Being on his knees and hands shows he was significantly hurt. It's a staple of comics.
Another made up rule by you. I guess Darkseid was seriously hurt when he tripped on some steps!
He was totally Depowered, so yes. It's a sign of weakness.

Hilarious. Darkseid was obviously not seriously hurt as he got right back up. So much for your nonsense rule.

Quote:


Quote:


Quote:


Quote:


Quote:
You said she was vastly weakened without showing any proof.
Here it is again:
That's not a proof of being weakened. She is just stunned and recovered fairly quickly.
You just stated about Odin, and I quote, "Being on his knees and hands shows he was significantly hurt. It's a staple of comics." I just showed you Wonder Woman being on her hands and knees after getting blindsided by Darkseid's omega beams. Now you're saying, "That's not a proof of being weakened. She is just stunned and recovered fairly quickly." Hypocrisy much? So I can add this to the long list of all the evidence of you lacking credibility.
So Odin was as weakened by one shot from Thor as Diana was weakened by Darksied? Are you saying Diana is equivalent to Odin now? Because Darkseid is stronger than Thor.

I'm not saying any of those things. You're the one who arbitrarily made up a rule that "being on his knees and hands" means being "significantly hurt. It's a staple of comics," except that rule plainly goes against the original point you were trying to make - that Diana wasn't injured at all when Darkseid blindsided her. So you're caught applying one standard for Odin and another to Wonder Woman, which is of course what you do in all your posts regarding Marvel and DC characters so you have no credibility.