![]() |
|
![]() |
Comic Battle >> View Post |
|
| ||||||
Reply Subj: Re: Credibility revealed Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2017 at 11:25:56 am EST (Viewed 165 times) | |||||||
Quote: How about we show the whole quote? Quote: " same:Thor suckerpunched Odin in the face? And Odin was hurt far worse than Darkseid was. He was on his knees and hands for a full page. Only by depriving Thor of mjolnir. With mjolnir Thor beats down Odin in one shot. By your own logic man.". Quote: By the logic Darkseid was getting stalemated by Justice League, Thor beats down Odin too. That was my whole point. There are so many problems with all of your misleading statements above, I don't know where to begin. Suffice to say, the context about Wonder Woman, not Darkseid (note that the original thread title is "Darkseid vs Wonder Woman: WW 36 spoilers"), and even your own quote says that Odin only beats Thor by depriving him of Mjolnir and with Mjolnir, Thor beats Odin. So you still have no credibility. Quote: Quote: Quote: Quote: Quote: Quote: Quote: Uh, no. I stated the exact opposite - that Thor can lift billions of tons so knocking down someone who weighs a few hundred pounds isn't particularly indicative of anything. Of course when I pointed out when Wonder Woman knocked Zeus on the ground with one blow and was standing over him, you said that meant nothing, completely displaying your hypocrisy on the matter. Now by YOUR own logic, DC Zeus is a weakling.That line doesn't even make sense. Read all the above quotes to understand why it makes no sense. I didn't make some stupid rule about being a weakling just because someone fell down on their hands and knees. You did. It's not my logic. It's yours. Quote: Quote: Quote: Quote: Yes! Doubling down on the knee defense! I love it.Being blinded and being on your knees are two completely different things. You're the one arguing that being on your knees is worse than getting blinded, which is absurd. Quote: Quote: Quote: Quote: Are you a fifth grader by any chance? So let's look at your claim that the Aegis armor isn't significant. It creates an impenetrable force field, absorbs energy directed at it, and can redirect that energy against the attacker:No. I already showed you where the comic states it does more than that. Here is the scan yet again. Funny how in this very thread you state, "We go by what's on panel, not what most people think." This is what's on panel, but you're going by what you think instead. Your hypocrisy never ends. ![]() Quote: Quote: Read this carefully: "human child" (you got caught with their pants down again)What's that about going with what's on the panel? Here is what's on the panel: "human child." And he was an amnesiac human child with no experience with his powers. Of course that makes him less powerful. Who is more powerful, someone with thousands of years of experience with those powers or someone who has no experience with those powers? ![]() Quote: Because it is? And when Thanatos comes to collect their souls, they were shown as adults. That has nothing to do with Zeus being an amnesiac human child at the time before his death. I already posted all the scans between the time Hera explicitly stated Zeus had amnesia right up to the point before Typhon killed him and at no point in the comics did anything happen that would give Zeus back his memories. Quote: I never admitted any such thing kiddo. You're just making things up once more. You have no credibility because you deny what's right there on panel while demanding that what's on the panel be the only evidence. Quote: Quote: Quote: Quote: You were trying to show that Marvel Zeus wasn't that powerful by saying Typhon beat Zeus and Hercules beat Typhon while ignoring that this wasn't normal Zeus but amnesiac human child Zeus, that this wasn't normal Typhon because he was powered up by the Aegis, and that Hercules didn't beat Typhon with his own power but used the waters of Lethe. If that's not misleading, I don't know what is. And then you claimed that Zeus had regained his memories when he had not, which is plainly stated in the scans above. You have no credibility.Quote: http://2.bp.blogspot.com/jW5jTJd0aPcG7m9fEyxT8B6LQ4EyEpYg2xy-HY61pboCkGZMYCU6brRtjISCd69QnPRhteCAbY8V=s1600http://2.bp.blogspot.com/IK1GeICvVy19rhpMu5C9OCB7M3t7uz1AavmV4wBCZfTt6KEke1u0DmrNdR2_zg1KQ2Bg0RQp1X2r=s1600 That Hercules has to teach Zeus how to use his own powers makes my case for me. Zeus has his power, but he is in the body of a human amnesiac child. It's stated right on panel in the scan I posted above. You already admitted you were trying to be misleading with this example, but once I stated using this example as undermining your credibility, you try to walk it back, but your disingenuousness is plain for everyone to see. For you to pretend that the amnesiac human child Zeus is equivalent to the adult Zeus with all his memories is absurd. Quote: Quote: Quote: Typhon didn't use Aegis to kill ZeusThat sentence makes no sense. Hera's head getting blown up is her being shown dead physically. Quote: Quote: Quote: and Hercules physically killed Typhon by bashing his head in after giving him amnesia. The waters of Lethe made Typhon forget he had the Aegis so he didn't use it. Just moments earlier, Hercules tried to club Typhon and the Aegis reversed the blow, injuring Hercules severely. Will your attempts to mislead never end? Quote: So Zeus is top tier, eh? Normal Zeus is. Of course your choice to use a human child amnesiac Zeus as an example is misleading. Your choice to pretend Typhon was normal Typhon when he was powered up with the Aegis is misleading. Your choice to pretend Hercules beat Typhon with his own power is misleading. Of course you admitted you were being misleading on purpose here too. So you have no credibility. Quote: Quote: Quote: Quote: Quote: Quote: Quote: Quote: Then you haven't really read my posts. If I’m so biased against DC, why would I make posts promoting DC characters like this:So you admit to violating board rules? So you admit to having no class? Argumentum ad hominem usually arises when you failed in every other respect. Quote: Quote: Quote: Quote: Wow, you're so confused, you're responding to your own insults as if they were directed at yourself. You wrote both of the above lines. I am amused.Really? How am I not credible? I'm not the one contradicting myself left and right. I'm not the one using misleading examples. I'm not the one using one standard against Marvel characters and the same standard in support of DC characters. Quote: Quote: Quote: You're unbiased? Don't make me laugh. You're the biggest Odin and marvel fanboy here. Wait until you read his racist quotes. Quote: Quote: Quote: Nekron is a legitimate death abstract. You might as well call Presence a skyfather level character in your marvel zeal. Nekron has only recently been written that way under Johns. He wasn't always that way. Watch Wonder Woman and an inexperienced Witchfire beat your DC abstract! Then I guess DC abstracts aren't very powerful if they can get overpowered by Wonder Woman and an inexperienced Witchfire. Note that this isn't my stance. It's your claim that Nekron has always been written at abstract power level and yet can be beaten by Wonder Woman and Witchfire. ![]() ![]() Quote: Quote: That doesn't say Odin is more powerful than Spectre. I gave Spectre a range whose average is 120 compared to Odin's 85. I said that Spectre is usually on the lower end of that range. I didn't specify in that post but by lower than 120, I meant around 100, which is still greater than 85.Quote: Quote: Quote: I'm not sure what you are talking about here. Are you really this desperate? You're refusal to answer the question answers the question. How to make an entrance: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PfMiOlIUGQw | |||||||
Posted with Mozilla 11.0 on Windows 7
| |||||||
|
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2021 Powermad Software |