Comic Battle >> View Post
Post By

Member Since: Tue Dec 29, 2009
In Reply To

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 3,077
Subj: Re: Ah, so you have changed your tack,
Posted: Wed Dec 27, 2017 at 03:59:15 pm EST (Viewed 170 times)
Reply Subj: Re: Ah, so you have changed your tack,
Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2017 at 09:44:47 pm EST (Viewed 180 times)

Previous Post


      No, it took two to knock him down. There is no suggestion that he was collapsing.

    Except for the actual art. It very much shows him collapsing after a blast and two hits.

The art only shows him getting knocked down. Nothing shows him collapsing.


      Firmly established only in your dreams maybe.

    You mean in what is shown on panel. We never see them getting up. We see them up. You have no knowledge of who was up first. Thor was out easily ten seconds after Thor, so Thor could very well have been sitting more than 10 seconds before Superman comes to.

Yes, we see them getting up in the same panel. Occam's razor means they were up at the same time unless someone has a scan where Thor was up first.

There was even a shot where both Thor and Superman were shown KOED before that.


      Yes there is since Thor got koed first and then was up at same time as Superman.

    Again, you have no panel showing them getting up at the same time. Thor is already up and we see Superman being helped up. That leans more toward Superman getting up after.

Yes, I do. Thor was not up before Superman. You are just making that up.

Thor and Superman were both koed.

Previous pages.

Next page.

Show us where Thor was up first.


      Of course he was, that's why he wrote the scene.

    Then that's why he wrote the fight in the Savage Land; to give Superman the benefit of the environment. His statement that Superman's strength is related to "his tan" supports this.

There is nothing to indicate that being in savage land somehow amped Superman. If you have any proof from JLA/Avengers, kindly show us. Don't waste my time with your fanfiction.


      You're taking a comic written a decade later as a proof now?

    Did not both happen in continuity? You never apply an event in one book to something that happens in another?

As a proof to another comic a decade earlier, no.

You're just desperate now.


      I'm not taking wild shots to show why Thor losing to Superman isn't him losing to Superman or how Superman was amped in savage land based on a comic written a decade later.

    Who said that Thor didn't lose? Haven't you claimed that Galactus was amped in Annihilation? Again, don't be hypocritical.

Because he was shown amped in Annihilation. I didn't claim it because of a panel in secret wars which published in 2015.

You are claiming that Superman was up first. You have the burden of proof. Occam's Razor is a problem solving principle that has no application here.

None of your scans show them getting up at the same time. Superman is shown in a getting up process while Thor is settled in a seated position. If one rose first, it would be Thor.

Posted with Mozilla 11.0 on Windows 7
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2022 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2022 by Comicboards/TVShowboards. Software Copyright © 2003-2022 Powermad Software