Dave Galanter
December 1st 1969 - December 12th 2020
He was loved.

Comic Battle >> View Post
·
Post By
zvelf

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 12,576
In Reply To
motifian

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 3,077
Subj: Re: lol
Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2017 at 04:59:12 pm EST (Viewed 244 times)
Reply Subj: Re: lol
Posted: Wed Dec 27, 2017 at 02:02:01 am EST (Viewed 232 times)



    Quote:

      Quote:
      Even before I clicked on that link, somehow I knew you were going to be grasping at straws. That scan doesn't say that. It only says the waters of Lethe transformed Zeus into the body he's in now. However, this scan plainly states that Zeus is a "HUMAN child". Now why would Greg Pak use that language if Zeus were not a HUMAN child?
    Because he wasn't a human child.


LOL!


    Quote:
    You flat out denied that Typhon had defeated Zeus in ancient times because it was Typhon who said it. Now you're taking Typhon at his words?



    Quote:
    http://www.comicboards.com/php/show.php?rpy=comicbattles-2017121818582211&search=edna&layout=thread


I denied that Typhon had defeated Zeus because even in Typhon's recounting, Zeus defeated Typhon. I simply questioned Typhon's slanted characterization of Olympians.


    Quote:

      Quote:

        Quote:

          Quote:
          Even more fascinating is that you refuse to admit you're ever wrong about anything and so you keep doubling down on absurdities and obfuscate and distort until you don't even know what you're arguing any more. You first brought up the Thor knocking over Odin example to demonstrate that Odin wasn't hurt just like Darkseid knocking down Wonder Woman didn't mean she was hurt. But your Marvel hatred is so strong, that morphed into you thinking Odin was hurt and that Odin is a weakling. And then I brought up the example of Wonder Woman knocking down Zeus, and your only defense was that Zeus fell on his back so it's meaningless but Odin fell on his knees and so he's "seriously hurt." Come on! Then you literally ended up responding to your own insult that you tossed at me, mistakening it as something I said to you in our last thread. My writing style isn't even like yours. And after you accused me of hating DC and I showed you numerous posts in which I praised or advocated for DC characters, you stated that I wasn't sincere in these posts and was only doing so with an ulterior motive. I've been posting here for about 15 years, and you think I've been secretly lying about DC characters for all that time? That's just crazy talk.
        You can try to rationalize it any way you want, you do hate DC characters when it comes to your favorite marvel characters.
      I'm not rationalizing anything. I gave you a whole bunch of links, plain evidence of my posting positive things about DC characters going back 5 years, long before you came to this board, that utterly contradicts your assertion that I hate DC characters. I mean, you can keep asserting that, but it just makes you look foolish.
    Yes, you are the. And hysterically too I might add.


I'm not so hysterical that I can't write complete sentences.


    Quote:
    The only one who looks foolish here is you.


Yet I'm the one you said has cheerleaders here, not you.


    Quote:

      Quote:

        Quote:
        Are you surprised someone called you out on your blatant bias?
      I am surprised because I don't hate DC characters. In the roughly 15 years I've been on these boards, I don't recall anyone accusing me of that. Now, I do read more Marvel comics than I read DC, but I also regularly read DC, which I wouldn't if I hated DC.
    Yes, you do hate DC characters. You can stop pretending now. I won't judge you.


So we're arguing who knows my own mind better, me or you? You're someone I've debated with in half a dozen threads. You barely know me at all. I'm afraid you've completely lost on this point.


    Quote:

      Quote:

        Quote:

          Quote:

            Quote:

              Quote:

                Quote:

                  Quote:

                    Quote:

                      Quote:
                      Or when between losing the argument or being a hypocrite, you chose to be a hypocrite by claiming Thor knocking down Odin shows Odin to be a weakling but Wonder Woman knocking down DC Zeus means nothing.
                    Because both are not similar. Zeus wasn't on his hands and knees.
                  Right, because if you fall forward, you're a weakling and if you fall backward, getting knocked down means nothing. It's pretty clear you're the one getting the drubbing here.
                Being on his knees and hands shows he was significantly hurt. It's a staple of comics.
              Another made up rule by you. I guess Darkseid was seriously hurt when he tripped on some steps!
            He was totally Depowered, so yes. It's a sign of weakness.
          Hilarious. Darkseid was obviously not seriously hurt as he got right back up. So much for your nonsense rule.
        Are you alright? What do you think you're saying here?
      That your arbitrarily made-up rule is wrong.
    It's your rule dude. I just ran with it to its logical conclusion.


You can deny it all you want, but it's your own quote right above showing the course of our conversation. You wrote, "Being on his knees and hands shows he was significantly hurt. It's a staple of comics." All you're saying now is to believe you or believe our lying eyes!


    Quote:

      Quote:

        Quote:

          Quote:
          I'm not saying any of those things. You're the one who arbitrarily made up a rule that "being on his knees and hands" means being "significantly hurt. It's a staple of comics," except that rule plainly goes against the original point you were trying to make - that Diana wasn't injured at all when Darkseid blindsided her. So you're caught applying one standard for Odin and another to Wonder Woman, which is of course what you do in all your posts regarding Marvel and DC characters so you have no credibility.
        Now you are just flip flopping all over the place. Take a stand and stick to it. If Diana was weakened because she was on her hands and knees, so was Odin. You can't have it both ways. Diana wasn't injured, she was stunned only and recovered quickly. Anything else is pure conjecture on your part.
      I'm not flip flopping. You are. I never stated that Odin was seriously hurt. You did. You stated that being on hands and knees means you're "significantly hurt" and that's "a staple of comics." Wonder Woman was knocked on her hands and knees. Now you're saying she wasn't injured. In other words, you're contradicting yourself and painting yourself a hypocrite by applying one standard to Odin and another to Wonder Woman. I already pointed out the big differences between the Odin and Wonder Woman scenarios and have never wavered on that.
    Yes, you are. I'm ready to accept that Diana was weakened if you accept that Odin was weakened.


Well, that's a complete admission of defeat. Reality is not something you can bargain over.





How to make an entrance: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PfMiOlIUGQw
Posted with Mozilla 11.0 on Windows 7
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2021 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2021 by Comicboards/TVShowboards. Software Copyright © 2003-2021 Powermad Software