![]() |
|
![]() |
Comic Battle >> View Post |
|
| ||||||
Reply Subj: Re: Credibility revealed Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2017 at 11:15:18 pm EST (Viewed 143 times) | |||||||
Quote: Quote: I notice you can't muster any defense except to be as vague as possible because you know I'm right.Because you can't. Quote: Quote: Quote: And I showed you how it was directly stated to be able to redirect kinetic energy only.I'm not making up anything. The Aegis WAS SHOWN redirecting Zeus' lightning! Right here below. So much for your credibility yet again. You still don't think this amped Typhon or are you going to deny what's right on panel here? ![]() ![]() Quote: Zeus was as powerful as ever. Experience doesn't increase or decrease power. Experience vastly increases or decreases how well you can use that power. If you have a weight lifter and a boxer who are equally strong and durable, the boxer is going to win a boxing match easily. Experience matters. Quote: Quote: Again, the debate isn't whether Zeus has his power, which I've always stated that he does. The debate is whether Zeus is more powerful in his regular form with all of his experience using that power than in the body of a human child with amnesia. You're saying regular Zeus is not more powerful, which is absurd. Being able to use your power well makes you more powerful than someone who can't use that power well.Lightning bolts that were deflected by the Aegis. Quote: There is no evidence that he was less effective than usual. The evidence is that he had amnesia! Quote: Quote: Quote: Quote: You have no credibility because you deny what's right there on panel while demanding that what's on the panel be the only evidence.See how once again, you can't provide any evidence? You on the other hand stated that only what's on panel matters, stated that being on one's hands and knees means that character is significantly weakened, said that's a staple of comics, was shown Wonder Woman on her hands and knees, then denied she was weakened while maintaining that Odin was weakened because he was on his hands and knees. You contradict yourself and show your hypocrisy throughout this thread. No wonder you "don't do defense." No one could credibly defend themselves after that. Of course you're just going to meaninglessly retort that this is me, not you without any evidence. Your entire line of debate is based on argument by assertion and argumentum ad infinitum. Look at all the threads in which you provoke response after response without asserting anything new. You apparently assume that simply because someone stops responding to you that your case has been proved but all you've proven is you're really tiresome. https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Argument_by_assertion Quote: Quote: Quote: Quote: Quote: Quote: You actually don't know how Typhon killed child Zeus because it happens off panel, but we saw the Aegis deflect Zeus' lightning, so already that's the Aegis helping Typhon kill Zeus in that it gives him defense against all of Zeus' energy projection. It also redirects physical blows as it did to Hercules, so it also blocks all of Zeus' physical attacks.Another assertion without proof. Again, Zeus died off panel. You don't know how Zeus died. My point is that the Aegis is a powerful weapon that helped Typhon. Strange that you have to ask what my point is. Whatever I say, you repeat it back like you're a 5 year old in over your head. Quote: Quote: Quote: Quote: The waters of Lethe made Typhon forget he had the Aegis so he didn't use it. Just moments earlier, Hercules tried to club Typhon and the Aegis reversed the blow, injuring Hercules severely. Will your attempts to mislead never end?Wrong. So let's disprove YOUR ability to read with the scans explicitly showing that Hercules did NOT bloody Typhon with the Aegis before Hercules gave Typhon amnesia. Where's all that Typhon blood? Oh, there is none. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Quote: Quote: Quote: And Typhon didn't need Aegis to beat Zeus in ancient times when he ran away. There was no fight before that! Typhon says, "I so terrified you gods, that you fled to Egypt and hid as animals. All save your brave daughter Athena, who with cutting slights against the manhood of Zeus, drove you into battle against me, which you ended only by dropping Mount Etna atop me, and sealing me inside Tartarus with my brothers." That's the whole story of Typhon's encounter with the Greek gods. There is nothing there about Zeus running away AFTER Typhon beat him. In the only depiction of a fight between Typhon and Zeus in Typhon's recounting, Zeus won. Let's see another one of your arguments by assertion like "You're wrong." Quote: Quote: Quote: You tried to argue that Hercules only gave Typhon amnesia, will your excuses for Marvel skyfathers never end? Another vague argument by assertion. Quote: So Hercules killed Typhon who is feared by Zeus and Zeus couldn't kill him by himself, right? Zeus defeated Typhon in ancient times. In recent times, Typhon defeated Zeus because Typhon was helped by the Aegis and the Zeus he beat was an amnesiac child. Hercules killed Typhon because he had the aid of the waters of Lethe. So you're doing again what I've said throughout this whole thread: being misleading and destroying your own credibility while you're at it. Quote: Quote: Quote: Quote: Quote: Or perhaps I'm simply mocking you. Of course. You can only repeat me. I must be your idol. Quote: Quote: Quote: Have you by chance read any of your posts regarding Odin? Read them and it will be cleared why you don't have any credibility. Argument by assertion. You can't provide a single specific. Quote: Quote: Quote: He was only pushed through a door. It's not worse than Logos getting stomped by Black Panther or most cosmic hierarchy getting beaten by an alternate Reed Richards. They were in a metaphorical realm where the usual rules don't apply. Quote: Nekron was only pushed through a door. Argument by assertion and argumentum ad infinitum. You're saying the exact same thing as in your quote above without adding anything after I provided the on-panel text showing Wonder Woman and Witchfire physically defeating Nekron. Well, you added one thing. You just admitted that Nekron was "stomped" just like in the Logos case. At least Logos had an excuse. Quote: Quote: Quote: But you concede that you haven't read much of DC for making the claim that Nekron wasn't powerful before. In his very first appearance he gave Krona enough power to destroy universe. Where in the comic does it state he was only partially summoned? Quote: Quote: Quote: Quote: Quote: Quote: So you deny that you posted on these Alvaro boards before as Abhijit?I'm waiting. How to make an entrance: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PfMiOlIUGQw | |||||||
Posted with Mozilla 11.0 on Windows 7
| |||||||
|
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2021 Powermad Software |