Comic Battle >> View Post
·
Post By
Knight

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 9,727
In Reply To
HammerTime

Member Since: Sun Jan 07, 2018
Posts: 892
Subj: Re: This guy knows what he's talking about it
Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2018 at 07:49:45 pm EST (Viewed 45 times)
Reply Subj: Re: This guy knows what he's talking about it
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 at 08:58:15 pm EST (Viewed 68 times)




    Quote:
    I don’t know, dude. What feats and victories have you been seeing? I find they’re often exaggerated, like backhanding In-Betweener and drawing blood... without informing everyone of minor details like in-betweener was literally powerless within the vicinity of the prison Thanos freed him from. “Powerful enough to draw In-betweener’s blood” I’ve seen, but why let details get in way..


For your comparison:

Darkseid: https://www.reddit.com/r/respectthreads/comments/3fq2aj/respect_darkseid_preflashpoint/

Thanos: https://www.reddit.com/r/respectthreads/comments/3mln0t/respect_thanos_the_mad_titan/

As you can plainly see, Thanos has the better feats.


    Quote:
    His durability? is that his flesh can melt inside Ego’s stomach? Surely that can’t be hotter than the sun or earth’s core which a handful of top tiers can withstand.



    Quote:
    https://m.imgur.com/a/QDyPd



    Quote:
    Do you seriously see a writer ever writing Superman’s flesh as capable of burning like this?



    Quote:



One feat isn't enough to convince me Darkseid would win against Thanos.





It's interesting that a hero/villain performs one amazing feat, or use a power they haven't used for 20+ years, and that automatically propels them to a high status despite scans and evidence to the contrary. I don't know what is worse, selective feat picking that has only been done once or twice 20, or more, years ago or ignoring evidence from scans or the lack thereof. We need to stop putting our favorite heroes/villains on pedestals and start putting them where they really belong. But it's evident that people never will because they would rather accuse others of cherry picking feats, when they don't, and being 'morally superior' when they aren't. I guess being honest and as fair as possible only opens one up to being the target of childish accusations and fault finding by those who insist on acting petty and childish. What happened to a good debate between two civil, mature, adults?
Posted with Mozilla 11.0 on Windows 7
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2018 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2018 by Alvaro Ortiz and Dave Galanter. Software Copyright © 2003-2018 Powermad Software