Subj: Re: Expanded from BK Rays 'herald to skyfather' percentages thread ...Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2018 at 03:24:52 pm EST (Viewed 80 times)
| Reply Subj: Expanded from BK Rays 'herald to skyfather' percentages thread ...
Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2018 at 12:19:12 pm EST (Viewed 115 times) |
| Previous Post
Very interesting to see some of the answers from BKRays earlier thread. I hope i am not breaking some kind of 'Board etiquette' by doing this and if i am please tell me and ignore this post.
Anyways - wanted to expand on the 'if Odin is 100 what is....' with a DC spin:
DC Ares
Wonder Woman (pre52)
Superman (pre52)
Captain Marvel (Billy) (is there really a difference pre52 vs post? Besides some electical powers?)
Doomsday
Darkseid
Green Lantern Hal Jordan
Ganthet
Trigon
Mister Mytzplk (sp?)
Crisis Anti-Monitor
Spectre (classic)
Superboy-Prime
Mongul the senior
Mongul the junior
|
DC Ares: Hard to pin down. His power level is all over the place. In one story, he's so powerful, not even Superman can beat him. In another story, he's being killed by Wonder Woman.
Wonder Woman (pre52): 70%
Superman (pre52): 80%
Captain Marvel (Billy) (is there really a difference pre52 vs post? Besides some electical powers?): 80%
Doomsday: 90%
Darkseid: 85%
Green Lantern Hal Jordan: 75%
Ganthet: 93%
Trigon: Don't know enough to quantify
Mister Mytzplk (sp?): 100%
Crisis Anti-Monitor: 100%
Spectre (classic): 100%
Superboy-Prime: 95%
Mongul the senior & Mongul the junior: 70%
It's interesting that a hero/villain performs one amazing feat, or use a power they haven't used for 20+ years, and that automatically propels them to a high status despite scans and evidence to the contrary. I don't know what is worse, selective feat picking that has only been done once or twice 20, or more, years ago or ignoring evidence from scans or the lack thereof. We need to stop putting our favorite heroes/villains on pedestals and start putting them where they really belong. But it's evident that people never will because they would rather accuse others of cherry picking feats, when they don't, and being 'morally superior' when they aren't. I guess being honest and as fair as possible only opens one up to being the target of childish accusations and fault finding by those who insist on acting petty and childish. What happened to a good debate between two civil, mature, adults? |
|
|
