Comic Battle >> View Post
·
Post By
Knight

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 9,682
In Reply To
bragagain007

Member Since: Tue Dec 27, 2016
Posts: 302
Subj: Re: Expanded from BK Rays 'herald to skyfather' percentages thread ...
Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2018 at 03:24:52 pm EST (Viewed 80 times)
Reply Subj: Expanded from BK Rays 'herald to skyfather' percentages thread ...
Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2018 at 12:19:12 pm EST (Viewed 115 times)

Previous Post

Very interesting to see some of the answers from BKRays earlier thread. I hope i am not breaking some kind of 'Board etiquette' by doing this and if i am please tell me and ignore this post.

Anyways - wanted to expand on the 'if Odin is 100 what is....' with a DC spin:


DC Ares

Wonder Woman (pre52)

Superman (pre52)

Captain Marvel (Billy) (is there really a difference pre52 vs post? Besides some electical powers?)

Doomsday

Darkseid

Green Lantern Hal Jordan

Ganthet

Trigon

Mister Mytzplk (sp?)

Crisis Anti-Monitor

Spectre (classic)

Superboy-Prime

Mongul the senior

Mongul the junior



DC Ares: Hard to pin down. His power level is all over the place. In one story, he's so powerful, not even Superman can beat him. In another story, he's being killed by Wonder Woman.

Wonder Woman (pre52): 70%

Superman (pre52): 80%

Captain Marvel (Billy) (is there really a difference pre52 vs post? Besides some electical powers?): 80%

Doomsday: 90%

Darkseid: 85%

Green Lantern Hal Jordan: 75%

Ganthet: 93%

Trigon: Don't know enough to quantify

Mister Mytzplk (sp?): 100%

Crisis Anti-Monitor: 100%

Spectre (classic): 100%

Superboy-Prime: 95%

Mongul the senior & Mongul the junior: 70%





It's interesting that a hero/villain performs one amazing feat, or use a power they haven't used for 20+ years, and that automatically propels them to a high status despite scans and evidence to the contrary. I don't know what is worse, selective feat picking that has only been done once or twice 20, or more, years ago or ignoring evidence from scans or the lack thereof. We need to stop putting our favorite heroes/villains on pedestals and start putting them where they really belong. But it's evident that people never will because they would rather accuse others of cherry picking feats, when they don't, and being 'morally superior' when they aren't. I guess being honest and as fair as possible only opens one up to being the target of childish accusations and fault finding by those who insist on acting petty and childish. What happened to a good debate between two civil, mature, adults?
Posted with Mozilla 11.0 on Windows 7
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2018 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2018 by Alvaro Ortiz and Dave Galanter. Software Copyright © 2003-2018 Powermad Software