Comic Battle >> View Post
·
Post By
zvelf

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 9,611
In Reply To
motifian

Member Since: Sat Jun 10, 2017
Posts: 1,210
Subj: Re: Dan Jurgen's take on Darkseid, Doomsday, and Superman
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2018 at 11:10:43 pm EST (Viewed 34 times)
Reply Subj: Re: Dan Jurgen's take on Darkseid, Doomsday, and Superman
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 at 11:19:48 pm EST (Viewed 45 times)



    Quote:

      Quote:

        Quote:
        So Doomsday couldn't escape the rubble, huh?
      Of course Doomsday escaped the rubble. He escaped the rubble then nearly killed Darkseid.
    After getting killed and resurrecting as per countdown bio.


The Countdown bio was referring to Doomsday resurrection after the Death of Superman story, not Darkseid killing Doomsday which never happened! Your ability to misinterpret and mislead is jaw dropping.


    Quote:

      Quote:

        Quote:

          Quote:
          You just contradicted yourself. Doomsday "resurrects" immediately from Darkseid's attack and he never comes back to life after OWAW. Some regeneration! No, you're just making up stuff again. No one reads Hunter/Prey thinking Darkseid killed Doomsday except you.
        Because entropy is the only attack he can't regenerate from. It's what killed him in Hunter Prey and that's what Imperiex did to him in OWAW.
      You just completely made that up about Imperiex. I told you I have the OWAW trade and can flip to any page to identify all the stuff you brazenly make up. Imperiex simply blasts Doomsday in one shot and turns him into a skeleton. There's no statement or narration saying anything whatsoever about an entropy attack.
    Oh you. Imperiex straight up used entropy on both Superman and Doomsday.


Posting some random scan that says nothing about entropy is supposed to prove your point? Amusing.


    Quote:

      Quote:

        Quote:

          Quote:
          Yes, yes, we get it. You think Darkseid is more powerful than Odin and Galactus. You think Doomsday is more powerful than Odin and Galactus. You think everyone in DC is more powerful than Odin and Galactus. I mean you're on record for thinking Odin is a weakling, so we know where you stand.
        I accept your concession. No need to pout about it.
      You said earlier that H/P Doomsday would kill any skyfather. Let's see, who was able to fight H/P Doomsday at length, for a much longer duration than Darkseid? Oh, Superman. I guess you think Superman is more powerful than Odin and Galactus too.
    Superman was powered up by kryptonite X and further boosted by mother box. As revealed in Superman man of tomorrow 9.


Oh, a mother box! I guess that makes Orion skyfather level too. As for all that stuff about Kryptonite X, Bizarro, and Eradicator, you went to a lot of work to prove nothing. Everyone knows Superman was powered-up after he came back from dying, and Superman merely references this in Hunter/Prey. However, that power-up is different from the one you're talking about when he loses control of his powers. That story is a completely different story from Hunter/Prey. You hope to conflate them to ridiculously claim that Superman is three or four times more powerful than normal when that wasn't even stated in the storyline when he lost control of his powers. That's truly hilarious especially since nowhere in Hunter/Prey is anything of the sort mentioned. Superman wasn't remotely unable to control his powers in Hunter/Prey. I seriously can't determine whether you're deliberately attempting to mislead people or you're delusional to the point of having a tenuous grasp on reality.



    Quote:

      Quote:

        Quote:

          Quote:

            Quote:

              Quote:

                Quote:
                What Jurgens says in interviews and shows in comics are two different things. As you say interviews are irrelevant.
              You're right that I don't take interviews seriously. I made that caveat from the start and just posted this interview for people who do. And YOU are one of them as you often cite interviews as supporting evidence. Of course now that the interview blatantly contradicts you, now you want to say it's irrelevant. So are all the interviews you've used in the past irrelevant too?
            You say you don't take the interview seriously? Stop arguing about it as if it's proof then.
          See, I just proved once again that you just cherry pick what counts for you.
        Heh, I'm cherry picking? So why does Jurgens is right about what he says about Darkseid and wrong about Thor?
      It's in one ear and out the other for you. I already stated that Jurgens retracted what he was about Thor. Jurgens did not retract what he said about Darkseid, Doomsday, and Superman.
    Where in that interview did that happen? In fact this board itself confirms that Jurgens was totally serious.


You pretend like you don't know. Obviously Jurgens didn't retract it in the interview otherwise there would be nothing to retract. Jurgens retracted his Thor comments after the interview and the interview was subsequently edited to note that retraction. However the interviewer interpreted Jurgens at the time of the interview is irrelevant to Jurgens' retraction. In other words, I'm not cherry picking, but you very much are.




Posted with Mozilla 11.0 on Windows 7
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2018 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2018 by Alvaro Ortiz and Dave Galanter. Software Copyright © 2003-2018 Powermad Software