Comic Battle >> View Post |
|
| ||||||
Subj: Re: Dan Jurgen's take on Darkseid, Doomsday, and Superman Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 at 07:27:28 am EST (Viewed 155 times) | Reply Subj: Re: Dan Jurgen's take on Darkseid, Doomsday, and Superman Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2018 at 11:12:21 pm EST (Viewed 185 times) | ||||||
Quote: Quote: Quote: Entropy in DC is stated to be lack of energy and matter. Hence why when Superman dies in Superman 173 and brought back to life in AOS 595, he states he died because of entropy. This whole thread is filled with you just making up stuff. Quote: Quote: Quote: Quote: Superman was more powerful than before he died, BUT that power-up is different from the extra power you are referring to when he lost control of his powers.Nope. You're referencing two different stories. Quote: Quote: Quote: Quote: I've posted scans as well. You're just in denial now. Scans from two different stories that don't have to do with each other. You want to act as if the Superman who was very much powered up and losing control of his powers is the same version of Superman in H/P who wasn't losing control of his powers and was only powered-up by his permanent but new power-up from the Eradicator incident. Quote: Quote: Quote: Quote: Quote: So Superman is indeed a million times more powerful than Thor? The comics, as per the scans in this very thread, show Superman thoroughly beating Darkseid three different times. The comics show Doomsday beating Darkseid to near death. So your assertion that the comics don't reflect Jurgens' opinion is pretty questionable. Also, if Jurgens is irrelevant, why do you keep citing his retraction regarding Superman being a million times stronger than Thor as being meaningful? You sure act as if it's meaningful, amusingly what was retracted is most meaningful to you of all. Quote: Quote: Quote: It links to a post from Thor board which is not found. It's not part of the interview. Hilarious! You ask for the post linked to in the interview. I give it to you, and then you say it doesn't count! In other threads going on right now, you cite authorial intention but then dismiss authorial intention when it goes against your beliefs. Quote: Quote: Quote: What you interpret is not what is stated in the interview. Jurgens meant that Superman is millions of times more powerful in THAT interview. As you take Darkseid comment seriously, take that as well. I don't take that whole interview seriously. But as you are using that as a proof, be prepared to really what you sow. Except he wrote Doomsday practically killing Darkseid and then Superman giving Doomsday a much tougher fight than Darkseid did. So, no. You want to take into account all kinds of outside comparisons with Cyborg Superman that are irrelevant. How to make an entrance: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=49xWJJvpjzI | |||||||