Dave Galanter
December 1st 1969 - December 12th 2020
He was loved.

Comic Battle >> View Post
Post By

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 9,888
In Reply To
Reverend Meteor

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 11,689
Subj: Re: How does DS kill him?
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 at 11:49:43 am EST (Viewed 112 times)
Reply Subj: Re: How does DS kill him?
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 at 09:25:38 am EST (Viewed 161 times)

Previous Post


    Chop his head off, then burn the body and spread the ashes to the four corners of the Earth

That still won't stop him really. He's had his head chopped off. He's had all his limbs separated. He's been reduced to ashes.

The fake will win because he just won't die. The bad characters never do.

I highly doubt Deadpool can magically summon all his limbs and body parts from the four corners of the world. And even if he could, Deathstroke is a master strategist and would have thought of that. So, if Deadpool truly can't be stopped even that way then he's given a fate worse than death because he can't go anywhere. Trapped forever underground in coffins of Adamantium.

But by the offchance even that won't stop Deadpool from coming back, Deathstroke simply steals the phantom zone projector and banishes the fake into the Phantom Zone. Trust me, Deathstroke would find a way. Can't kill him? Then make sure Deadpool experiences the next best thing to death. Let's see him try and get out of an Adamantium coffin.

It's interesting that a hero/villain performs one amazing feat, or use a power they haven't used for 20+ years, and that automatically propels them to a high status despite scans and evidence to the contrary. I don't know what is worse, selective feat picking that has only been done once or twice 20, or more, years ago or ignoring evidence from scans or the lack thereof. We need to stop putting our favorite heroes/villains on pedestals and start putting them where they really belong. But it's evident that people never will because they would rather accuse others of cherry picking feats, when they don't, and being 'morally superior' when they aren't. I guess being honest and as fair as possible only opens one up to being the target of childish accusations and fault finding by those who insist on acting petty and childish. What happened to a good debate between two civil, mature, adults?
Posted with Mozilla 11.0 on Windows 7
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2021 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2021 by Comicboards/TVShowboards. Software Copyright © 2003-2021 Powermad Software