Community >> View Post
·
Post By
MysteryMan

Member Since: Fri Apr 28, 2017
Posts: 642
In Reply To
zvelf

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 7,903
Subj: Re: Regarding that mess in Virginia
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2017 at 09:12:01 am EDT (Viewed 70 times)
Reply Subj: Re: Regarding that mess in Virginia
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2017 at 05:52:34 pm EDT (Viewed 76 times)



    Quote:

      Quote:

        Quote:
        I do question it when you equate the group that killed someone with the group that did not to be on the same moral footing, when you equate the group that promotes racism and the group that protests against that racism to be on the same moral footing. That is wacked moral reasoning.

      Quote:

        Quote:
        1-person killed people...not either HATE group.



    Quote:
    So you're another moral equivocator. First, antifa is not a hate group unless you think hating neo-Nazis means you belong to a hate group. Second, did you even see/hear what the neo-Nazis/white supremacists at the rally were saying about the violence they would be happy to perpetrate? They promote violence so it's no surprise when one of their number engages in violence that kills somebody.


Well I see you made no attempt made at civil discourse, not suprising. Didn't realize you were an antifa member. antifa may call itself a group that hates neo-nazis, but throwing Molotov cocktails and presidential inaugurations doesn't fit that description. But equivocate all YOU like


    Quote:

      Quote:
      If and when Antifa kill or cause someone to be killed, I am sure they all wont be blamed for it. Just the specific person right?



    Quote:
    Sure, the movement will get SOME blame. Prosecution under the law will only apply to that one person, but law and morality are not the same thing. I've already condemned antifa's methods on more than one occasion in this thread. If someone in antifa kills someone, then of course that someone gets primary blame, but insofar as antifa tolerates or promotes violence, they will be enabling that someone and should be admonished for it. Hell, Trump has promoted violence in some of his speeches. That is morally reprehensible.


I am sure you will do your best to minimize the blame they receive in your own mind, since you are defending them here. No one is defending Trumps moronic statements about violence he made during his election run.


    Quote:

      Quote:
      All Hate groups are garbage people.



    Quote:
    So you hate hate groups. Does that mean you belong to a hate group now too?


I suppose English isn't your first language? Here is an educational link...

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/garbage

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hate


    Quote:

      Quote:
      And when one of them goes too far they will face justice.



    Quote:
    This was never a question about justice. No one's debating whether anyone who breaks the law deserves justice. The question here is whether both sides share EQUAL moral blame. The one murderer clearly belonged to one side. Yes, violence is bad, but is violence against racism every bit as bad as violence in support of racism? If you think so, then you implicitly think being for and against racism is morally equal, and thus, I question your moral character. Let's put it another way, is violence fighting Hitler's Germany in WWII every bit as bad as violence in support of Hitler's Germany in WWII?


antifa is not violence against racism...its violence for anarchy. Anarchy is NOT a good thing. Tat is what antifa is truly supporting. Yes lets bring back the Dark Ages why don't we?

I am not comparing them...I am calling them both what they are HATE groups. That you defend your fellow antifa members is not surprising though.


Posted with Mozilla 11.0 on Windows 10
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2017 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2017 by Alvaro Ortiz and Dave Galanter. Software Copyright © 2003-2017 Powermad Software