The audio tape clearly has Hillary say the defendant passed the polygraph, then she laughs when she said that it forever destroyed her faith in polygraphs. She laughs at the idea of a man, who she thinks is guilty of raping a 12 year old girl, passing a polygraph and getting him off with time served.

But the Hillary thing isn't the main point of the conversation. I'm demonstrating how the outrage at Trump is selective. When Trump does something, it's a "horror", and "scary", but if other politicians have done similar things, "nothing to see here, let's move on". As you have done. Nobody should laugh at a 12 year old girl being raped. Of all the many points I made in my post, you choose that to defend? You choose to defend Hillary giggling while discussing the rape of a 12 year old girl? Snopes leaves out the part of the defense blaming the girl for having a tendency to "seek out older men", and calling her "mentally unstable". I ask you if you want to reconsider standing up for Hillary on this point.


I'm confused by your shift to talking about white supremacists. Are you accusing me of being one?