Community >> View Post
Post By

Member Since: Tue Apr 04, 2017
Posts: 1,466
In Reply To

Member Since: Fri Apr 28, 2017
Posts: 3,226
Subj: Re: I Think That She Was Being Disingenuous, But She Might Have A Point.
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2018 at 08:09:00 pm EST (Viewed 406 times)
Reply Subj: Her idea was still completly absurd. UNless you want to apply it to any and all products.
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2018 at 08:24:29 am EST (Viewed 421 times)

Previous Post

    There was another mass shooting that happened not too long ago, and after the horror that was the Vegas tragedy, I do think that something needs to be done. I don't think that it's possible to prevent all of this, and I think that we'll always have gun violence and some mass shootings. BUT, there are ways to decrease this.
    When Hillary was running (Her second time.) against Bernie, she came up with this ABSURD idea to sue the gun manufacturers and the dealers, and to hold them responsible for gun violence and mass shootings (This was in response to a lawsuit that was filed by the families of Sandy Hook victims.). It is really absurd (I mean, you don't go after Budweiser for Drunk Driving deaths, or Honda for vehicular manslaughter, do you?), but it might actually have some merit. Maybe if guns were better regulated or harder to obtain legally, this stuff wouldn't happen. I don't know, but I'm actually starting to kind of see her point. It's not going to happen anytime soon, but maybe we do need some more gun laws.

...and the pharmaceutical companies that kill far more every year would make a better target imo.

I think that she was just saying that to appeal to people who were are anti-gun and or who are just fed up with gun violence (I guess that would include most people.). Pandering! She wasn't saying this when she ran against Obama. But she might have a point, as guns are pretty much designed to be made to kill or cause bodily harm. That's pretty much the purpose of them, so it's different than knives, cars or alcohol. Although she should have just come out and SAID that she's for ending gun manufacturing or for making drugs illegal, because if you go after the gun MANUFACTURERS (Who, by the way, don't sell to the public.), that's pretty much what's going to happen. Also, who makes guns for the cops? Duh!

Posted with Google Chrome 48.0.2564.116 on Windows 10
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2018 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2018 by Alvaro Ortiz and Dave Galanter. Software Copyright © 2003-2018 Powermad Software