Community >> View Post
Post By
Trent Trueheart

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 1,002
In Reply To

Member Since: Tue Apr 04, 2017
Posts: 1,511
Subj: Re: No
Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2018 at 10:17:29 am EST (Viewed 480 times)
Reply Subj: Re: No
Posted: Sat Feb 24, 2018 at 08:40:11 pm EST (Viewed 537 times)

     No, because mass shooters WANT to kill or hurt their victims. Armed victims would pose a challenge because they might shoot back. It's not a secret that criminals are less likely to rob houses if they know that the occupants have a gun. 

Mass shooters either have some connection to the place they choose, or choose a place to make a statement.  Having armed resistance isn't going to stop school shooting since most school shooters are either current or former students.  All it's going to do is make them realize they have to take out the people with guns first.  Or it's going to change their method of causing chaos.

I feel like there's really a difference in philosophy on these mass shootings.  You have one side that wants to prevent them from happening while the other side wants to stop them in progress.  Which makes more sense?

Posted with Mozilla Firefox 58.0 on Windows 10
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2020 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2020 by Alvaro Ortiz and Dave Galanter. Software Copyright © 2003-2020 Powermad Software