Community >> View Post
·
Post By
Comicguy1

Member Since: Tue Apr 04, 2017
Posts: 1,511
In Reply To
bd2999

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 17,392
Subj: Re: Kind Of A Logical Fallacy.
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2018 at 03:04:04 pm EDT (Viewed 343 times)
Reply Subj: Re: Oh, John LOTT!
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2018 at 11:06:36 am EDT (Viewed 427 times)


He did, that is the book I am referring too, it is a highly flawed statistical study. I will not go into it too much but it is the exception rather than the rule.>

  What is the exception? I read that the book was highly flawed and often inaccurate, yes. Other researchers have come to the same conclusions, though.

but police also lack the ability to take people's guns in Florida even with cause>

  As it should be, as that's Due Process. If he didn't have any criminal background, a tighter process wouldn't have done anything.

 I guess in a sense that is fine but we do little to improve broad systems that at least would help. >

 True, there are restrictions would could do good. But most of these shooters don't have criminal backgrounds and were not criminals AT THAT TIME!

The guy at Sandy Hook for instance, he was raised in a gun culture and we know that he had some problems. Should parents get in trouble before then for allowing access, for not locking them away or for not having them?

  Yes, absolutely! And had she not been shot or killed, she most likely would have been charged with negligence.

It is more important that everybody have as many guns as possible than worrying about the killings that do have because of access. .>

 No, that's kind of a strawman. The whole problem with this is that preventing people from getting guns is not fair and harmful to LAW-ABIDING citizens.



 







Posted with Google Chrome 48.0.2564.116 on Windows 10
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2018 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2018 by Alvaro Ortiz and Dave Galanter. Software Copyright © 2003-2018 Powermad Software