The Flash >> View Post
Post By
Knight

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
In Reply To
Jesusfan

Subj: Re: The Fury of Firestorm Review *SPOILERS*
Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2015 at 12:59:33 am GMT (Viewed 569 times)
Reply Subj: Re: The Fury of Firestorm Review *SPOILERS*
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2015 at 11:42:50 pm GMT (Viewed 4 times)




    Quote:
    This episode hasd a lot going on, from wife who will be dead now bring news of wally West, a brother to sister, and maybe another Flash in future?


Yes, the Producers have confirmed Wally West will be a speedster. Unfortunately.


    Quote:
    Liked Killer Shark, as he looked really bad and powerful, maybe him and Grodd doing a future team up against the Flash gamg?


Doubtful. That 30 seconds of King Shark was VERY expensive to make (so I've read online). So, we likely won't see much of King Shark.


    Quote:
    now we have another evil firestorm to go woth good one, and hope that new Firestorm will learn how to use his matter transmuting powers!


I'm hoping for this as well. \:\)


    Quote:
    Barry new lady friend just might be an evil Metahuman to come?


Oh man, I hope not.


    Quote:
    Isis was really cold as ice, she should become new Killer Frost!


Isis was not on this show. Iris was though and no. Killer Frost is Caitlin Snow. \:\)


    Quote:
    Wonder what the other Flash, jay, will be doing now in the lab?


Eating Barry's pizza and cookies. ;\)


    Quote:
    barry looked to be really surprised to see E2 Dr wells, wonder how they will get along, and still see Barry needing him to stop Zoom!


It'll be interesting to find out. ;\)


    Quote:
    i the bew Dr wells now maybe the smartest man on earth?


That's stretching things a little. But who knows.


    Quote:
    And wonder when and if Supergirl gets to crossover to meet Flash/Arrow then?


IF Supergirl is a success, then most likely not until it's second season.





It's interesting that a hero/villain performs one amazing feat, or use a power they haven't used for 20+ years, and that automatically propels them to a high status despite scans and evidence to the contrary. I don't know what is worse, selective feat picking that has only been done once or twice 20, or more, years ago or ignoring evidence from scans or the lack thereof. We need to stop putting our favorite heroes/villains on pedestals and start putting them where they really belong. But it's evident that people never will because they would rather accuse others of cherry picking feats, when they don't, and being 'morally superior' when they aren't. I guess being honest and as fair as possible only opens one up to being the target of childish accusations and fault finding by those who insist on acting petty and childish. What happened to a good debate between two civil, mature, adults?