![]() |
|
![]() |
The Flash >> View Post |
|
| ||||||
Subj: There is still a huge problem with your theory Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2016 at 10:33:30 pm GMT (Viewed 230 times) | Reply Subj: How the REVERSE FLASH could still appear Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2016 at 07:57:11 am GMT (Viewed 8 times) | ||||||
As soon as he emerged out of the Speed Force, BAM! Erased from existence. Without Eddie Thawne, there IS No Reverse Flash, Paradox or not. Period. It was a very weak explanation by the writers and I'm not buying it for a second. That leaves only two options that can explain this. 1. Eddie Thawne was somehow revived and is alive. 2. From dialogue in the show, we know that they are all living in an alternate reality because in the original, Barry becomes the Flash a bit later and Nora never dies. But by going back in time and killing Nora, taking over Dr. Wells' life, building the particle accelerator so Barry becomes the Flash sooner so Thawne can go home sooner, etc, this created an alternate timeline to the main timeline. And the Reverse Flash we saw is from the MAIN timeline and in the MAIN timeline, Eddie Thawne is still alive because he never killed himself. But the Reverse Flash accidentally traveled to the alternate timeline somehow when he wasn't supposed to and learned some key things that will allow him to become his alternate self, but for now he is still from the MAIN timeline because his alternate self is erased. It's interesting that a hero/villain performs one amazing feat, or use a power they haven't used for 20+ years, and that automatically propels them to a high status despite scans and evidence to the contrary. I don't know what is worse, selective feat picking that has only been done once or twice 20, or more, years ago or ignoring evidence from scans or the lack thereof. We need to stop putting our favorite heroes/villains on pedestals and start putting them where they really belong. But it's evident that people never will because they would rather accuse others of cherry picking feats, when they don't, and being 'morally superior' when they aren't. I guess being honest and as fair as possible only opens one up to being the target of childish accusations and fault finding by those who insist on acting petty and childish. What happened to a good debate between two civil, mature, adults? | |||||||
Posted with Mozilla 11.0 on Windows 7
| |||||||
|
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2022 Powermad Software |