The Flash >> View Post
·
Post By
Knight

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
In Reply To
Iron Man Unit 007

Subj: Re: Tom Cavanagh will be in Season 3 but.....
Posted: Sat May 28, 2016 at 12:08:47 am BST (Viewed 492 times)
Reply Subj: Tom Cavanagh will be in Season 3 but.....
Posted: Fri May 27, 2016 at 10:56:42 pm BST (Viewed 11 times)




    Quote:
    http://www.comicbookresources.com/article/tom-cavanagh-will-be-a-series-regular-in-the-flash-season-3



    Quote:
    WHO will he be?



    Quote:
    I'm betting on Earth 1 Wells, not RF


I HOPE this is true. This would mean:

1. Reverse Flash doesn't get erased at the end of season 1 because Barry stops him in the past. That also means that particular timeline will no longer exist.

2. If Barry stops Eobard Thawne in the past and prevents him from killing Dr. Wells, then that means Eddie Thawne doesn't die. *Crosses fingers that Eddie will not return as a regular for season 3*

3. If both of the above happen, that fixes the Time Paradox that says the Reverse Flash should not exist since he was erased from existence at the end of season 1 then miraculously showing up in season 2 with a cop-out explanation.

If the above conditions are met, the Showrunners will make a big leap towards fixing some of the glaring problems they created throughout season 2.

Frankly, Tom should have been playing Earh-Prime Dr. Wells through season 1 not Earth-2 Dr. Wells.





It's interesting that a hero/villain performs one amazing feat, or use a power they haven't used for 20+ years, and that automatically propels them to a high status despite scans and evidence to the contrary. I don't know what is worse, selective feat picking that has only been done once or twice 20, or more, years ago or ignoring evidence from scans or the lack thereof. We need to stop putting our favorite heroes/villains on pedestals and start putting them where they really belong. But it's evident that people never will because they would rather accuse others of cherry picking feats, when they don't, and being 'morally superior' when they aren't. I guess being honest and as fair as possible only opens one up to being the target of childish accusations and fault finding by those who insist on acting petty and childish. What happened to a good debate between two civil, mature, adults?
Posted with Mozilla 11.0 on Windows 7
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2022 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2022 by Comicboards/TVShowboards. Software Copyright © 2003-2022 Powermad Software