The Flash >> View Post
·
Post By
Ancient One
Moderator

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 6,611
In Reply To
JS

Member Since: Thu Oct 29, 2009
Posts: 272
Subj: Re: Writers confrim next years crossover deals with the future Newspaper headline
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2019 at 09:12:04 am EST (Viewed 364 times)
Reply Subj: Re: Writers confrim next years crossover deals with the future Newspaper headline
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2019 at 08:25:03 am EST (Viewed 360 times)

Previous Post


    Quote:
    How do you think respected physicists can stand on stages and give presentations like the one - and there are many more - that I linked to if there's no mathematical evidence pointing in that direction? How do you think they can come up with possible ways of travelling into the past if there was no mathematical evidence indicating that it could possibly be done? They'd be instant laughing stocks.

    But they're not. Why? Because they understand the physics, and they've done the maths. They understand that the evidence points to it being at least theoretically possible.

If the best you have is “at least theoretically possible” then that’s still only guesswork, not proof. You have no proof to support your claims.


    Quote:

      Quote:
      That is not possible until time travel becomes a reality.


    Quote:
    Your loss.

And what loss is that? What am I losing?


    Quote:
    I never said it makes ANYTHING else they write automatically wrong. I said it would be safe to assume there are other INSTANCES where they get things wrong.

Not without proof, it’s not.



If the best you have is “at least theoretically possible” then that’s still only guesswork, not proof. You have no proof to support your claims.

It's certainly not the best. As I said it's "...at least'. There's more to it, but if you're dimply going to dismiss it without researching it for yourself, you'll never know. 

And what loss is that? What am I losing?

A little knowledge. A little insight into the subject. At the very least it would give you a firm platform to refute my statements instead of attacking them from a position of ignorance of the subject.

Not without proof, it’s not.

I can't show you proof, but I can show you strong evidence. After that it would be up to you to read the papers, watch the lectures and follow the maths as far as you can.



Posted with Google Chrome 64.0.3282.140 on Windows 10
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2018 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2018 by Alvaro Ortiz and Dave Galanter. Software Copyright © 2003-2018 Powermad Software