Green Lantern >> View Post
·
Post By
Knight

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 9,710
In Reply To
Iron Man Unit 007

Member Since: Thu Oct 20, 2011
Posts: 3,069
Subj: Re: The spectrum powers Hal has used are:
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 at 01:48:37 pm EST (Viewed 320 times)
Reply Subj: The spectrum powers Hal has used are:
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2018 at 09:38:17 pm EST (Viewed 326 times)



Yep, I know what he's wielded. It's pretty cool. I just wish the Alley Rat hadn't done it better. But the writers had to make him even more "special" than he already was...


    Quote:
    He has not wielded Indigo/Compassion and Violet/Love.  


I can't picture Hal wearing pink. *Shudders* So, hopefully he will never wield that one. But hey, I wouldn't mind Hal becoming a White Lantern and wielding all the colors to outdo the Alley Rat. Wouldn't mind at all. \:\)


    Quote:
    Also Hal was the host of the Spectre, was converting him from the spirit of vengeance to a more heroic version.


This is one of Hal's greatest feats of willpower considering how powerful the Spectre is.


    Quote:
    Then Parallax manifested again, Hal realizes the truth, starts to use his will to get free of parallax and uses his will to jolt the Spectre into separating them all. he then calls his ring back to his body as he returns and wills himself back to life.


Actually, I think it was Ganthet who restored Hal back to life as he did create a ball of green energy that directed Hal to his body.






It's interesting that a hero/villain performs one amazing feat, or use a power they haven't used for 20+ years, and that automatically propels them to a high status despite scans and evidence to the contrary. I don't know what is worse, selective feat picking that has only been done once or twice 20, or more, years ago or ignoring evidence from scans or the lack thereof. We need to stop putting our favorite heroes/villains on pedestals and start putting them where they really belong. But it's evident that people never will because they would rather accuse others of cherry picking feats, when they don't, and being 'morally superior' when they aren't. I guess being honest and as fair as possible only opens one up to being the target of childish accusations and fault finding by those who insist on acting petty and childish. What happened to a good debate between two civil, mature, adults?
Posted with Mozilla 11.0 on Windows 7
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2018 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2018 by Alvaro Ortiz and Dave Galanter. Software Copyright © 2003-2018 Powermad Software