Justice League of America >> View Post
Post By

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
In Reply To
The Overlord

Subj: Re: What would like to see in a sequel of the Justice League: Heroes video game
Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 at 05:54:08 pm EDT (Viewed 223 times)
Reply Subj: What would like to see in a sequel of the Justice League: Heroes video game
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 at 10:12:48 pm EST (Viewed 468 times)

Previous Post

If there was a sequel to the Justice League: Heroes video game, what would you like see in it?

Also did you like Justice League: Heroes?

I'd like the 7 core members to come into play as the MAIN players and other JLA Members to be bonus members. I would like the addition of Supergirl (Kara) and Wonder Girl.

With the exception of the storyline, it Justice League: Heroes was nothing more than a mindless beat'im up game. Despite that, I did like JLA: Heroes.

But a definate must if there is to be a second installment is a ton more side quests with variety. Similar to what we see in Fantasy RPG's. There is SOOOO much potential to implement those kinds of things into a super hero game, I am very surprised it hasn't been done already but focused soley on either Fantasy Games or Sci-Fi and never Super Heroes.

And what we do see is always limited to only RPG's (City of Heroes, DC Online...etc), but never OFFLINE, which tends to be very frustrating.

I would also like to see more variety in GL constructs. I was very disappointed with the lack of originality in that regard in JL: Heroes.

It's interesting that a hero/villain performs one amazing feat, or use a power they haven't used for 20+ years, and that automatically propels them to a high status despite scans and evidence to the contrary. I don't know what is worse, selective feat picking that has only been done once or twice 20, or more, years ago or ignoring evidence from scans or the lack thereof. We need to stop putting our favorite heroes/villains on pedestals and start putting them where they really belong. But it's evident that people never will because they would rather accuse others of cherry picking feats, when they don't, and being 'morally superior' when they aren't. I guess being honest and as fair as possible only opens one up to being the target of childish accusations and fault finding by those who insist on acting petty and childish. What happened to a good debate between two civil, mature, adults?