Justice Society of America >> View Post
·
Post By
Rip Jagger

In Reply To
Mikel Midnight

Subj: Re: What was horrible about the SO#31 version?
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 at 04:00:08 pm EDT
Reply Subj: Re: What was horrible about the SO#31 version?
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 at 12:18:24 pm EDT (Viewed 1 times)

Previous Post

> > Well, in my mind we had Roy Thomas at his worst, rewriting (I mean, adapting) a story that was only a few years old and adding all of his 1980s overly verbose and faux-historical flourishes that ultimately killed All-Star Squadron for me. Yes, we had to get rid of Superman and Batman, but the new version left a bad taste in my mouth when compared to the wonderful Levitz original, cheesy as it may have been.
>
> The Levitz-Staton-Layton version is exquisite for sure. I'd have to agree alas that much of Roy's later stuff for the JSofA and A-SS was a tad too pedantic to maintain its momentum. Having to go back and excise such key heroes from these classic tales was unfortunate and the whole endeavor has a feeling of straightening furniture rather than designing a new room. :-/

As much as I am not a fan of A*S, I don't believe this was a task Roy particularly relished. However, it's as reasonable a job of making the story work sans Superman as anyone would do.

It's water under the bridge anyway, as of course DC won't even stick to the SO#31 but will give us yet a third origin for the team (I'd be happy to be proven wrong, but it would be standard operating procedure for them).

>
> As much as I am not a fan of A*S, I don't believe this was a task Roy particularly relished. However, it's as reasonable a job of making the story work sans Superman as anyone would do.
>

I'd agree. I don't see how he could've liked it much, maybe more of chore, a necessary evil to get the story at least quasi-coherent. After all his work on A-SS, it had to be a royal pain to have to unravel much of it.


> It's water under the bridge anyway, as of course DC won't even stick to the SO#31 but will give us yet a third origin for the team (I'd be happy to be proven wrong, but it would be standard operating procedure for them).

I can't imagine it's still canon. The DCU is such a plastic concept, that I don't much even try to keep track of that stuff. It's beyond convoluted. \:\-\)

Rip Off


Posted with Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 on Windows XP
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2018 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2018 by Alvaro Ortiz and Dave Galanter. Software Copyright © 2003-2018 Powermad Software