Marvel Universe >> View Post
·
Post By
Sandman

In Reply To
spiderprince

Subj: Re: A post CW Marvel and the SHRA is still a flaming pile of crap and Tony is an idiot.
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 at 03:02:50 pm CDT
Reply Subj: Re: A post CW Marvel and the SHRA is still a flaming pile of crap and Tony is an idiot.
Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 at 05:37:53 pm CDT

Previous Post

> I just read Captain America #25, NA #28, and Mighty Avengers #1 which has provoked some CW thoughts.

>

> Now, to be fair, Ironman tried to make the best of a bad situation...but he's still a moron for supporting this. Here's a couple of points that have been argued in support of the SHRA.

>

> The will of the people. Supposedly there the ones who want the SHRA but they didn't seem too happy when Cap was going to court being dragged around like a common criminal. What did there signs say? Oh yeah, "free Captain America" even though he broke the precious law. Hell, I even saw a few "SHRA is fascist" type signs in the crowd. So exactly which people are we talking about?



Not everyone is going to agree with any one side. Thats just unrealistic, especially considering that many people idolized Cap just prior to CW. Poeple still support him, but they are the minority.

>

> Property damage. This is just plain stupid. In Mighty Avengers there fighting a bunch of giant monsters and Ms. Marvel is worried about property damage? Even worse the govt. is gonna give them a hard time about it? There's no good reason for that other then some far fetched example of a hospital losing power which is in no way shape or form the heroes fault since it's the VILLIANS who are to blame since they attacked in the first place. Everyone loves to use the Military as an example for the SHRA (which is specious) so do you really think the Marines would give a damn about property damage in a war?



Its just stupid? Tell that to people that are in the buildings as they are crumbling, or the people out in the streets when rumble started falling?



> Controlling things from within. Supposedly as director of SHIELD Ironman can keep things reasonable except that in Mighty Avengers he makes it clear he doesn't have control since if they don't bring in the New Avengers "they" will. Crap crap crap.



We don't even know what that means yet. Lets not jump the gun about his "total loss of control" when we aren't even sure what he means.

> > I just read Captain America #25, NA #28, and Mighty Avengers #1 which has provoked some CW thoughts.
>
> >
>
> > Now, to be fair, Ironman tried to make the best of a bad situation...but he's still a moron for supporting this. Here's a couple of points that have been argued in support of the SHRA.
>
> >
>
> > The will of the people. Supposedly there the ones who want the SHRA but they didn't seem too happy when Cap was going to court being dragged around like a common criminal. What did there signs say? Oh yeah, "free Captain America" even though he broke the precious law. Hell, I even saw a few "SHRA is fascist" type signs in the crowd. So exactly which people are we talking about?
>
>
>
> Not everyone is going to agree with any one side. Thats just unrealistic, especially considering that many people idolized Cap just prior to CW. Poeple still support him, but they are the minority.
>
> >
>
> > Property damage. This is just plain stupid. In Mighty Avengers there fighting a bunch of giant monsters and Ms. Marvel is worried about property damage? Even worse the govt. is gonna give them a hard time about it? There's no good reason for that other then some far fetched example of a hospital losing power which is in no way shape or form the heroes fault since it's the VILLIANS who are to blame since they attacked in the first place. Everyone loves to use the Military as an example for the SHRA (which is specious) so do you really think the Marines would give a damn about property damage in a war?
>
>
>
> Its just stupid? Tell that to people that are in the buildings as they are crumbling, or the people out in the streets when rumble started falling?

Tell that to the Thunderbolts, marshals, when they went after Daredevil or Clor. The pro-regs have been endangering innocent people a lot more then the anti-regs and been using the law as an excuse that says that it's ok for them to do it.
>
>
>
> > Controlling things from within. Supposedly as director of SHIELD Ironman can keep things reasonable except that in Mighty Avengers he makes it clear he doesn't have control since if they don't bring in the New Avengers "they" will. Crap crap crap.
>
>
>
> We don't even know what that means yet. Lets not jump the gun about his "total loss of control" when we aren't even sure what he means.


Posted with Mozilla Firefox 2.0.0.3 on Windows XP
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2018 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2018 by Alvaro Ortiz and Dave Galanter. Software Copyright © 2003-2018 Powermad Software