Marvel Universe >> View Post
·
Post By
Attok12

In Reply To
Skippy

Subj: Re: In defense of Slott
Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 at 08:10:35 am CDT
Reply Subj: Re: In defense of Slott
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 at 03:58:05 pm CDT

Previous Post

> I haven't seen the Bengal used in a while, but he was a South Vietnamese assassin whose parents were killed in Vietnam. He sought revenge on all of the American veterans involved in destruction of his village, including Will Talltrees/Red Wolf, Willie Lincoln, and even James Rhodes, a.k.a. War Machine, who is a member of Slott's cast. Not only does he not need training (although I understand the "be sent to camp or retire" bit), but he wants James Rhodes dead, dead, dead. So, if I had been writing the book, I would have had the Bengal willingly go to the camp just so he could get his mitts on Rhodes and kill him. I suppose that could still happen, but really. That would be an actual plotline. It's likely Slott just thought the Bengal was cool and stuffed him in the book so people who liked the character would say "Hey, it's the Bengal! I haven't seen him in a while! Cool!".

Anything I would have had to say about the second half of your response seems to have largely been covered already by other replies, but as for this whole Bengal thing, I must concede defeat. I knew nothing of the character and having learned, it does seem odd to have him placed in the camp. If he does intent to operate in America however, he is required to go to the camp regardless of his feelings toward Jim Rhodes. Also, it's only been one issue, it could be referenced before too long. Now you've got me hoping for a War Machine / Bengal confrontation!

- Skippy

> > I haven't seen the Bengal used in a while, but he was a South Vietnamese assassin whose parents were killed in Vietnam. He sought revenge on all of the American veterans involved in destruction of his village, including Will Talltrees/Red Wolf, Willie Lincoln, and even James Rhodes, a.k.a. War Machine, who is a member of Slott's cast. Not only does he not need training (although I understand the "be sent to camp or retire" bit), but he wants James Rhodes dead, dead, dead. So, if I had been writing the book, I would have had the Bengal willingly go to the camp just so he could get his mitts on Rhodes and kill him. I suppose that could still happen, but really. That would be an actual plotline. It's likely Slott just thought the Bengal was cool and stuffed him in the book so people who liked the character would say "Hey, it's the Bengal! I haven't seen him in a while! Cool!".
>
> Anything I would have had to say about the second half of your response seems to have largely been covered already by other replies, but as for this whole Bengal thing, I must concede defeat. I knew nothing of the character and having learned, it does seem odd to have him placed in the camp. If he does intent to operate in America however, he is required to go to the camp regardless of his feelings toward Jim Rhodes. Also, it's only been one issue, it could be referenced before too long. Now you've got me hoping for a War Machine / Bengal confrontation!

I doubt Slott will even bother to mention the Bengal's history with War Machine (something that Palmiotti and Gray would do), but seeing a Bengal/War Machine confrontation would be very interesting. I think the Bengal's hatred of Rhodes should be used as a part of the plotline, if the Bengal is used further. The Bengal also hates the Red Wolf, too, and I believe I saw him at the camp as well.


Posted with Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 on Windows XP
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2018 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2018 by Alvaro Ortiz and Dave Galanter. Software Copyright © 2003-2018 Powermad Software